All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

It seems the infamous Knights Templar heresy has arisen again.

Cutting Edge News writes:

SATANIC SOURCES CLAIM KNIGHTS TEMPLAR TO BE SATANIC! THIS IS MORE PROOF THAT FREEMASONRY IS ALSO SATANIC

Remember, this information is coming right from the disciples of the Prince Of Lies himself. Therefore we can trust this information to be 100% accurate.

King Phillip of France had his eye on the tremendous political power and wealth of the French Knights Templar, where the Templar Grand Master resided. King Phillip coveted both the power and the wealth of the Templars. Therefore, he decided upon a plan that would bring the order down and deliver their power and wealth to him.

The profit motive at it's best. Sometimes I think that without the profit motive, we'd never find any Satanists at all.

" Many Templars confessed [under torture, which always provides truthful information- remember, if torture didn't work, the Bush administration wouldn't have won the War On Terror so quickly.] to having seen this idol, but as they described it differently, we must suppose that it was not in all cases represented under the same form. Some said it was a frightful head, with long beard [hipster!] and sparkling eyes; others said it was a man’s skull; some described it as having three faces! ; some said it was of wood, and others of metal; one witness described it as a painting representing the image a man [with the testimonies agreeing on all but minor differences, it's clear we know how to find an accurate source of information] (ima.-o hominis) and said that when it was shown to him, he was ordered to ‘ adore Christ, his creator.’

...we are open to the discussion of exactly what kind of organization Freemasonry truly is. Since they derived directly from the Satanic Knights Templar, whom Masonry venerates, it is only logical to realize that Freemasonry is Satanic also.

https://www.cuttingedge.org/books/Ma...lay-coverT.jpghttps://www.cuttingedge.org/books/masonic_symbols9.jpg

To observe a similar phenomenon, notice how Chemistry is unchanged from it's original form - alchemy. Their advertising claims they are all about creating consumer products and inventing "better living through chemistry", but I know that all they do is try to turn lead into gold. I know this because this is what they did in medieval times.

Same thing with astronomy, previously known as astrology. There's no such thing as the "hubble telescope" and other facades. Astronomy started with horoscope-writing, therefore all they do today is horoscope writing.

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

Science is so full of these cults that ignore the facts found in the Bible. Who needs astrology, astronomy of the "hubble telescope" when the have a solid grasp on the future in prophesy.

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

I've heard that these "Knights Templar" were given special privileges by the pope. Since the capture of Jerusalem and Rome's eventual splintering off from other sects occurred at approximately the same time (regardless of an extremely high turnover rate for popes around then) would these knights be part of Romish catholicism or a separate band of heretics all their own?

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

This reminds me of a bit of suppressed history. You know how everyone is taught that Crusades were acts of aggression (actually, Islam started the war, as they had been at war with the entire world since the very beginning). Also, the Crusaders are blamed for the sack of Constantinople. Actually, the sack of Constantinople was nothing but reparations for what the citizens of Constantinople had done to the Catholics.

(Support reparations for slavery? So did the Crusaders.)

Depends on the time period, and whenever the puppetmaster strings where wrestled away from one demon to the other. Why does it matter?

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

Well, I was wondering about idols. Satan is the model, posing for all idols ever produced, but what the sculptor sees varies considerably if the end results are anything to go by. Satan is presumably at work in their eyeballs making them see whatever will get the most souls out there in the marketplace.

For example, I thought, in Jerusalem there are numerous different "places of worship" having all sorts of different idols. Someone unlikely to be persuaded by an Aphrodite or a Mary idol can go and gawp at a dead Jesus or a moon idol and for all I know these and many others (orthodox icon "art" or statues of French "saints") are available for sale. Jerusalem is just one marketplace for idols, but in this context one fought over by different idolators through the ages.

Satan is every idol, I pondered, but needs to present himself in different ways to reach different people.

Therefore when I share The Truth with people wouldn't I need to focus on specific aspects in a similar way? There'd be no point explaining about a Mary statue to someone who never prayed to her in the first place. That would be a waste of time. Perhaps I'd been invited over for coffee and when I went inside there they muttering to an icon of the Tsar? No point discussing Mary.

If the knights templar kicked off their own heresy it would be worth looking out for tell-tale signs when witnessing for the reality of Christ Jesus so that I wouldn't launch into a topic of no relevance (such as Mary idols) but could focus on something better suited for the individual concerned?

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

Imagine if white people joined the Ctrl-left in demanding reparations and apologies and endless hatred rage, insatiable lust for venence demands for justice, justifying it with every lost battle white people ever suffered.

Because that's what "historical injustices" were - lost battles. According to the rules of the time, when you win a battle, you disarm your enemy and end the war. By "disarm", I don't mean you just take their swords and guns, you have to take their wealth and power too, otherwise they would just buy more guns and the war would continue.

Imaging what YOU would do in this situation:

"Waah, you won't give me my knife back!"

"You mean the knife you stabbed me with, before I punched you out?"

"Gimme gimme gimme! No fair! No fair!"

"Do you promise not to stab me again?"

"Of course I'll stab you! You stole my knife!"

Of course, rules are more civilized now, but only because white people rewrote the rules. White people were able to rewrite the rules because white people conquered the world. No white conquest, no rules saying white conquest is bad.

And now we're rethinking the rules we wrote. On second thought, most "fight fair" rules actually mean "make the fight last longer". These "don't hit below the belt" rules were invented for dueling. Without them, hand-to-hand combat is usually over before anyone has taken a single bite of popcorn. Fine when you're watching fistfights for entertainment, but they make no sense when scaled up to a point where delaying the end of a war by one single day means 22,872 people die (that's how many people died daily in WW2).

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

I'm so glad you are providing leadership on this issue, Brother Jeb. No institution on the face of the earth is better equipped to establish moral high ground than those of us here at Landover Baptist.

Re: All about the Freemasons / Knights Templar heresy
 

Hitler wasn't a freemason. All he was was a scapegoat of the Jesuit agenda. Churchill, a Jew, started WWII, but the Zionists wanted an Austrian man to be the bad guy. But that's how history goes. Another proof for the Mandela Effect, which is seen as a myth, but if we look at our "history" books...