Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Romans 9:1
I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/i...0701142359.jpg

One of the key concepts of Creation Science and Flood Geology is to classify the Created kinds (Genesis 1:24). The human mind is, however, tainted by sin, and until now only the most pious Creation Scientists have been able to make reliable classification schemes between kinds. The issue of man vs. animal was never significant until Mr. Darwin and his heresies began to corrupt the minds of promising youths with the ideas of common descent and millions of years. This has led to the situation, where the only objective unprejudiced minds (apart from ours) are those of computers. They only tell what they perceive and see. They cannot be bribed or corrupted by wishful thinking. And when they do their job, outrage ensues. :(

Galatians 4:16
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

Thus, the Google computers DID their job and arranged some photos according to the subject matter. This is what these programs found out:
Let us examine this occurrence in detail.

1. The most advanced computer program ever examines some photos.
2. These programs see some faces and after the sophisticated algorithm does its job it recognizes gorillas.
3. Without prejudice or preconceptions, the program does the job that Creation Scientists have been trying to do for years: distinguishing between Created Kinds at first glance.

This was, however, immediately dismissed.
They were unable to "fix the problem", so they turned these computers off. This raises the possibility that there was no glitch, only an attempt to cover this up, as it did not fit the secular heresies of evolution. We are not saying that the Google computers are 100% right when they classify black people as gorillas. We should, however, not simply disregard advanced data but take this new hypothesis seriously. We can look at the Bible and various other sources for further evidence.

1. Apes are real. They were present as Ark kinds soon after the flood and used as merchandise. Gorillas are apes, thus, they are real.

2 Chronicles 9:21
For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.

2. There are some characteristics of gorillas that we should look for in people. In addition to facial features, these could be used as supplementary tools for classification. For instance, gorillas eat their own excrement.
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m96sKv9DQc8/hqdefault.jpg.
Gorillas are also rude.
https://llwproductions.files.wordpre...ird1.jpg?w=750

3. Many animals can understand simple utterances (for, instance, dogs follow orders), so language and the use of it are unreliable.

4. We cannot trust secular scientists ever again. They suppress evidence and if they look at the evidence, they fail to see it because they have chosen Satan. Jesus sees this and tricks these people deeper into the pits of self-deception and damnation.

Isaiah 66:4
I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

2 Thessalonians 2:11
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

PERSPECTIVES

1. We must examine this new issue in detail and not be intimidated by voices that simply dismiss this without conducting careful scientific studies. This is, however, very typical of secular biologists who only look for what they want to find and are deeply committed to their biases. This also reconfirms earlier studies of Landover Baptist Church.
2. The question of interbreeding is most fascinating. It offers us an alternative hypothesis based on genetic entropy. If some human populations (because of heavy sins) have been exposed to accelerated genetic deterioration after the Flood, we could expect to see many sign of degeneration, such as skin problems including pigmentation, loss of human facial features. etc.
3. All this can also explain why the evil lotionary theory was invented in the first place. It is extremely difficult to look at populations objectively and determine the boundary of man vs. animal that was clear and outside debate until the Fall, the Flood and the subsequent microevolution within Created Kinds due to Genetic Entropy into the less-perfect forms that we see now in contrast to the original glorious Kinds depicted in Genesis 1 (such as the Behemoth and the creeping things).

https://holdenbeck.files.wordpress.c...ey-soldier.jpg

As we can see, many commonly apelike features can be observed in the regular infantry fighting man of any army. The Truth™ about this is to be determined. Only Creation Scientists can do that, not the Google personnel, nor the outraged citizens. The Truth™ of Jesus is too important to be left in their hands.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

People make mistakes. Computers don't. If the computer sees gorillas, gorillas it is.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

This is indeed a breakthrough in Creation Science. This Explains a lot. We have of course known about secular science trying to cover up the truth by claiming that man is descended of apes. This is of course complete hogwash.
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.



However, I believe further research is needed with live subjects. Maybe we could see how the black people climb trees and eat bananas to see if there behavior is similar.

Maybe some interaction between the black people exist that is similar to that of the Apes.


YIC
Tobias :innocent:

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

If this happened in France, they would put the computer in jail.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

You can see why the computer did this, can't you? The resemblance between what I suppose to be the young woman here:

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/i...0701142359.jpg

and the ill-mannered gorilla in Brother Elmer's second example, here:

https://llwproductions.files.wordpre...ird1.jpg?w=750

is such that they could be sisters.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

I can't speak for creation science, but this is a landmark moment for science as a whole. This is it, we have crossed the threshold: we have finally created an artificial intelligence more intelligent than humans.

More intelligent than liberal humans, anyway. Hm, put that way it doesn't sound so impressive.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

I believe this is a plot by Democrats to cause people to believe in evolution. I suspect strongly that they are trying to point out the obvious physical similarities between apes and Negroes in order to try to prove that Negroes are descended from apes and, by inference, that White men are also descended from apes, as we are also people.


In fact, the skin of Negroes was darkened by God for their insolent crimes against Him and His word. Before that, they were just as white as everyone else. If evolution was true, this would actually be an example of reverse evolution, that is, man moving toward ape, not the other way around.


These liberals always come up with some kind of ridiculous story or another and then they repeat it endlessly, all of them, until you want to strangle them. That is, if you didn't already want to strangle them. They just can't see the absurdity of their story and, since they are all repeating the same story over and over and that's all they hear, they come to believe it themselves after a while.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

The resemblance is uncanny, sister.

It really is difficult to spot the difference between a porch monkey and an ape, but God bless Google for trying.

Even a shrewd observer can't easily discern the difference between a bull negroe like Yaphet Kotto, for example:

http://www.animalpictures1.com/data/.../monkey-14.jpg



...and this random silverback mountain gorilla:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-spqM-AbpafI/TO...s980/Drum3.JPG

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

This is exactly why I never go to a zoo. These days, what with free roaming nigras, you never can be quite sure if the gorillas got out of the cages or if it is free watermelon day :watermelon:.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Is that Moochelle Obummer without her weave on?

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

While the evidence are scarce at the moment, I was able to locate some more proof for this 'reverse evil lotion' that is called degeneration of the genome or, as mentioned earlier, 'genetic entropy' in the precise terminology of baraminology. I think the picture is emerging of some populations of Hamites degenerating at a speed that makes them similar to apes and virtually impossible to distinguish from brutal aboriginal men even with the most sophisticated technology, that is the Google differential engines. Why I suggest this? Because during these Last Days, the same is taking place in the Caucasian populations of sinners...

https://thetwist03.files.wordpress.c...-orangutan.jpg

...and in the Jooish remnants...

http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/8045...teinmonkey.jpg.

According to the Google engine, the simians (of the Created orangutan kind, a form of a guerilla) are on the right hand panels, but with my inadequate human vision I must rely on the computer's judgment. This can also be the result of man-beast fornicatory hybridazation OR a sign of the End of Days, the THIRD BEAST :fear2: !

Revelation 4:7
And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.

Our research team is at the moment still re-reading the Bible for more clues about the nature of these apparitions. We're expecting more news any week now.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer :bye:

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Negroes are in fact homo erectus!

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Dear Osiris. In fact, according to up-to-date Creation Science you are wrong. Partially, you are right, as Homo erectus or H. ergaster are fully human and not any imaginary transitional forms between apes and men. They are real humans that lived after the Tower of Babel. But... they are closest to Austrian aborigines and not Hamites. True, the Austrians may be an offshoot of Hamites, but there the evidence is still inconclusive. Why did they look somewhat unlike modern, genetically degenerated sinners? Creation wiki has the answer:
http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/...ctus_model.jpg

Job 12:10
In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind.

I appreciate your efforts to immerse yourself in the utterly interesting but challenging Science of Creation but I'd also appreciate some re-checking of your references.

Proverbs 14:16
A wise man feareth, and departeth from evil: but the fool rageth, and is confident.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer :bye:

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

A computer algorithm designed by rich white men demeans and marginalizes POC? What a surprise!

Black people have been Jim-Crowed out of tech for years by a combination of deliberate segregation and faux-meritocracy that subsitutes male-bodied and white skin privilege for actual skills and intellect. Google as a company is about as diverse as the KKK. When something happens by accident that conveniently reinforces white supremacy, it's safe to assume that it is no accident at all. I have no doubt that this computer did exactly what it was programmed to do when it dredged up this racist, hurtful, and antiquated stereotype, and I have already asked the SPLC to investigate Google as a hate group.

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

More like Jim-Chowed. That industry is nothing but chinks, chinks, chinks!

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Asian-Americans are severely underrepresented in tech leadership positions. They face discrimination just like any other minority.

How do I give Virginia an infraction for using racial slurs?

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

You can´t. Your arguments are so unconvincing even I won´t buy them. If anyone, YOU should be the one receiving an infraction. :(

Kind regards, Roland

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

You don't think that dropping out of school in the fourth grade has something to do with it?

Re: Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
 

Earth to Comrade Aleks: pretty much all of reality "reinforces white supremacy." Does that mean you've accepted the existence of a creator God?