Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold
“..we need to stay mad. This moral pollution must not be allowed.”
|
The Holy Spirit has made it clear which clothes are acceptable to God. Not even electric liberal kool-aid would change that but let's make the thought experiment anyway.
GLUG GLUGG GLUGGG GLUGGGG G G
OK. Now I'm a liberal. I am going to say that what may or not be appropriate clothing in terms of gender specificity varies between cultures. Scotsmen (and Jean Paul Gaultier) happily wear kilts and on the Balinese islands a sarong is acceptable, depending on how it's tied, regardless of gender identity. Say I visited Mejinong Temple on Stone Island in 200 years' time. Will the same conventions apply to sarongs then? Who knows?
As we saw in the last paragraph, gender-specific attire is quite arbitrary from time to time and from place to place. It's the same for clothing styles. Normally one would not turn up wearing a ballgown with flippers but an underwater hoedown for scuba divers could provide an exception. Or even spacesuits. Not regular attire planetside, yet where the couturier's skill is celebrated perhaps an appearance would not be out of place? Once again the standard is arbitrary. Time. Place. Occasion.
Plainly, then, there are no actual standards. Just malleable conventions. Not simply in terms of clothing but identity, too. It's been observed that chromosomes do not always affirm gender. XX or XY
(there are other combinations too: XXY, XYY, etc.) are not uniquely associated with a single sex. Just as there is no such thing as male of female clothing there is no such thing as male or female persons, either.
AUDIO LINK (7 minutes) » https://abcmedia.akamaized.net/rn/podcast/2019/02/hrt_20190204_1752.mp3
"Human sex reversal.." » https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07784-9
The conclusion is as obvious as it is respectful of all the genders and whatever clothing they choose to wear at any time, anywhere they go. There is nothing relevant in The Bible. No restrictions should be placed on what a person of any gender wears, regardless of which genders would most frequently choose any specific garment or where such garments would most often be worn.
And back to normal. Nowhere in the liberal agenda is any place for The Bible to be found. Except when they're telling us it doesn't mean what it obviously does mean or that everything it teaches is either wrong or hijacked from other cultures, which is the same as having no place. It's not for me to contradict The Holy Spirit but that liberal stuff is very easily refuted. Nature publishes a paper claiming that sex reversal is a thing. By that it's meant that a person of one sex has the sex chromosomes (when viewed under a microscope) of the other sex. That's not particularly new knowledge but now an explanation is available.
More than just the X and Y chromosomes are involved, probably not even slightly surprising, and additional factors either reinforcing or diminishing the chromosomal effect have been described. Has the liberal 84-genders-agenda been confirmed? Not at all. The whole point of this is that the person with the unexpected chromosomes is obviously either male or female. That is why whatever chromosomes they actually have are unexpected! Therefore gender is not flexible and specific garments are correctly attributed. There is no need to deny The Holy Spirit in this matter and that freak in Mayor Hold's original post will not require access to any facilities in Landover, educational or otherwise.