Thread: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost.
View Single Post
(#76)
Old
John Scopes's Avatar
John Scopes John Scopes is offline
Unsaved Trash, Monkey worshiping Darwinista
 

Evilution Atheist Hellbound Heathen Cancer on Society

 
Posts: 665
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dayton, TN.
John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.John Scopes is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.
Default Re: WARNING! Extreme sexual content - animals that should be banned and avoided by Christians at all cost. - 03-27-2016, 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyhonciano View Post
There's no need for name calling, I'm only curious how others perceive education and information, and also curious if alternatives were explored for this matter.


Doesn't it seem immature to ban an animal, solely on how humans identify it by name? Am I also correct to assume, that if you and I were to have an educated conversation (or just out of fascination about birds) about the Titmouse bird, that we aren't referring to the vulgar part of the word "tit," based on its urban definition?


It's really about context, and how the people are using the name in the conversation. It's like the technical term for "sex," which is another term for "classification" for male and female. So if I was to point out clothes that are unisex in design, I wouldn't mean that it's for intercourse, but it's clothes designed for both male and female.


Couldn't Christians come up with an alternative, if the above can never be considered? Just like how Christians have the pledge of allegiance to the Christian flag and the traditional American pledge of allegiance, couldn't a different "Christian" name be coined for animals that you feel offensive to its given name?
Welcome to this most fascinating place. You will come to find christians, and evangelicals in particular, to be spectacular examples of retarded evolutionary development. I have compiled volumes of scientific data in my time here, and it never gets boring.


“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.” Charles Darwin The Descent of Man (1871)
Reply With Quote