Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Jim Osborne
This is a case of self-defense, pure and simple. The defendant McInerney was obviously scared out of his mind by the potential rape by King. He felt his life and sexuality was in danger. So, he took a pre-emptive strike to the rape before it even happened.
The irony is that if this were the other way around, that some male high schooler was ogling a female student, and the girl killed the guy, the liberals would be out on the streets defending the female student saying she was acting out of her own self-defense and safety against a perverted rapist.
Double standards.
|
I hear you Reverend. This is just like when Bush staged a preemptive strike against Saddam Hussien. True Saddam didn't have the chemical weapons that Bush was after, but that was only because Saddam was too afraid of being attacked by Bush to make them. If Bush hadn't attacked Saddam, Saddam would have lost his fear of Bush and started making chemical weapons weapons. Saddam's attempted to avoid a confrontation with Bush forced Bush to attack.
It was the same deal with McInerney; the only thing stopping King from seducing McInerney and turning McInerney into gay sex slave was the fear that McInerney would murder King. McInerney knew the second King lost that fear King would press McInerny, McInerney would give into King's offer of oral sex and would end up chained and branded to King's bed post. McInerney HAD to strike first, just like Bush.