View Single Post
(#23)
Old
Aziz Mahood Aziz Mahood is offline
Unsaved trash
 
 
Posts: 31
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Godless New York
Aziz Mahood is a sorcerer and idolater who follows false gods and will rot in Hell.
Default Re: Creation Museum Says Black Folks are "Hamites" - 11-03-2010, 06:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by JennyD View Post
Surprisingly — or not? — the Creation Museum openly promotes the belief that black people are the descendants of Ham, father of Canaan, whom Noah cursed to be “servant of servants”. This Biblical belief, once used to justify slavery, seems to be on the rise again.



AiG's Creation Museum Says Black People are Hamites. Click for JUMBO version. (No, really. It gets bigger!)


Ham? And was their mother Cheese? What are you talking about?

Ham was one of the three sons of Noah. You remember Noah, right? He’s the man who, with his wife, his three sons, and their wives, provided no warning whatsoever to anybody over the course of 100 years that the Lord was going to flood the Earth. (Not what you heard in Sunday School? Try the Bible, friend!)

After the Flood, Noah and family set forth to incestuously repopulate the Earth (Genesis 9). Noah decided that, since food was somehow abundant, despite the obliteration of all life on Earth, he should tend a vineyard and make wine instead of growing actual food. Apparently, Shem, Ham, and Japheth took care of growing the real food.

Noah gets hammered. Let’s see what happens!
Genesis 9: 18-27

18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.

19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.

20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:

21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.

22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.

24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.

25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.

26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
So . . . Noah cursed Ham’s son, Canaan, to be “a servant of servants”.

According to the Creation Museum, Canaan and his descendants populated Africa. They were called [the nation of] Canaan, or Canaanites.

Populated Africa . . . That’d make them black folks, huh?

The argument that Noah cursed all of Canaan’s descendants has been used for centuries to justify the enslavement of black people. And Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum continues to promote this belief.

But, Ham cries, I’m not racist! I'm just following the Bible!

On the AiG website, Biblical racial theory is expanded for us: http://www.answersingenesis.org/crea...human_race.asp
All races therefore have developed from this one family since the end of the flood in Noah’s day . . . The culture (technology and religions, etc.) of each racial group in the world started at a common point -- Noah -- with full knowledge of God and a sophisticated ocean liner technology. [Yes, sophisticated ocean liner technology, the Ark. -JD] The current states of culture of the races, which varies from space age to stone age, from animal worship and spirit worship to Christianity, is not a result of innocent, ignorant people searching for improvement. It is a direct consequence of whether the ancestors of any race worshipped the living God or deliberately rejected Him.
That’s right. According to Ken Ham and God, those dark-skinned people in Third World nations are uneducated and starving to death and riddled with disease because their ancestors deliberately rejected God.

So why, I ask, do we keep sending aid to these people? Why do we not just send them Bibles and missionaries, so they can find God, and then be blessed like Americans?

It's so obvious that this is what we must do!
Surrely, you do not agree with them that Australian Aborigines is a sub type of caucastion.They look black to me.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Aborigines
Reply With Quote