Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Really, according to Darwnism the fish squirmed out of the water to avoid the sharks. The fish who did it the best didn’t get eaten and had kids, who were good at flopping around on the beach (why they didn‘t get eaten by a bird is beyond me). So why weren’t the sharks following up the beach eating the slowest? As I said right now sharks should be lobby Congress for school chumming not swimming in the ocean if Darwinsim is true.
The way you describe it there was the magical mutation and poof, there is the land fish who lived happily ever after. The only mechanism I know of that causes sudden, dramatic and benevolent changes is God or at lest a god. So you are saying Charles Darwin intervened to give those fish their legs. God Himself never claims to have done that so the only other agent would be your false god Charles Darwin.
|
As usual, you either misunderstand, misrepresent, or both. Evolution does not consist of acts of will or sudden, drastic changes, but of small changes over long periods of time.
Where on earth did you get the idea that people who believe the theory of evolution think that Darwin was personally responsible for mutation?
And I don't worship Darwin or any other human being.