Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Jim Osborne
I can honestly say, (IN THEORY...I NEVER TRIED THIS OUT) that when you are in an amorous mood and the female is being very withholding, that if you try to penetrate her, there is too much of a struggle. You start to hold her down, but she'll try to scratch you and kick you with her legs...that hurts. Hell, you'll get a terrible bruise all down your cheek so purple your friends will tease you the next day and say "Hey Jim, get knocked out the other day in a boxing match? HA HA".
No, a woman that resists rape WILL RESIST. She'll fight back, she'll claw. SHE WILL NOT LET YOU ACCESS HER LADYPARTS.
Thus, it stands to reason that any man who can access a woman's ladyparts was let in willing. If it was REALLY rape, the woman would've fought back so hard the man wouldn't have been able to perform the act. That is my point. I've seen this happen ALOT (to other people).
|
Sounds like not crying out to me...
Deuteronomy 22:23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; 22:24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.
Given the delay these days on actually getting on with the business of betrothing your damn virgins the germane point is the not crying out. Yeah they cry like babies later but God wouldn't make the distinction with a death penalty dependent on it if it was that hard to make a bit of noise?
Fair enough, if she's not betrothed we already know the rapist ought to cough up some cash to the father and marry her but do we see any sort of fair attitude in today's society where the rapist bears all the guilt? She didn't cry out; she wanted it. And God's clear on what should happen next.