While I sympathize with.... whatever this thread is about, I take issue with the insinuations made on an incidental point about a legally defensible definition of a reserved word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland
Let me help you out here. Assault rifles are just as real as assault hammers, assault cars, assault bottles etc. The term is meaningless. You can have a rifle, car, hammer or bottle and assault someone with it. The action is the assault, not the object (If any) you use to do the assault with.
|
Objection you're on 'er.