Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Lucid
well that's convenient . you make a claim, tell someone who disagrees that they have " little faith" but than when asked to back your faith up with action , magically you decline.
the fact that you view this wager as "gambling" shows you don't have faith in Donald trump. if you really knew he would be the nominee this wager wouldn't be a gamble at all, it'd be a sure thing.
you don't believe in Donald trump at all, you'll beat your chest, talk a big game, but when someone else is nominated in 2016 you'll blame satan or Muslims or something.
|
I can tell you don't know much about Presidential politics. You talk big, but don't know the first thing about how the nomination is secured and the electoral college votes won.
I'm busy, but I'll give you a primer:
The Iowa Caucus. Iowa is about making money growing corn. Donald's strong point is making money. The farmers goes to fundamentalist churches. So does Donald. Iowa goes to Donald.
New Hampshire Primary. New Hampshire is small so a lot of information passes person to person. Women love Donald's current wife. That goes from kitchen to kitchen. Men drink a lot of cafe coffee in New Hampshire. Donald drinks coffee. New Hampshire goes to Donald.
I've done this kind of analysis for the entire country, and the election is all but over. Donald knows it too and he will annouce soon.