Re: Baby names? -
05-09-2019, 05:42 PM
I do wish that the man wouldn't apologize like that. We KNOW that he wouldn't have used that photo to mark any other Royal birth, because he had a chance to do so just last year. (Also, a couple of years before that, and a couple of years before that that.)
There was simply no need to use the chimpy photo before this latest royal birth because William and Kate's children are fully white. Mr. Baker knows that this royal baby is different and he chose to mark the event in a significant way.
Baker knew full well what he was doing and apologizing by saying that it was somehow not intentional is a falsehood. The Lord does not appreciate lies. He does appreciate keeping the various races of His creation clearly marked and separate, as He has chosen to illustrate through many, many Bible commands that are too numerous to enumerate here.
So, Danny Baker, in the future, Do Not Lie. You must own up to your beliefs and stand firm with them. That is certainly what a True Christian™ would do.
P.S. If the baby begins walking and climbing about in the next few days, you know fully well that the press will never be allowed to hear of it.
P.S.S. Do you think that a picture of an orangutan might have been more appropriate?
His left hand should be under my head, and his right hand should embrace me.
Guns For God and the Economy
|