[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

From: How to get all liberal policy BANNED: call it "new technology"

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

What about unproven technology - "Questions have been raised," and of course if they haven't, just raise one.

I like that line.

I think the main reason the left hates technology is because it competes with their inferior products, and drives them out of business by actually solving the problems. They hate Nuclear power and Elon Musk. Why? Because the left already has a competing climate change plan, which is to socially engineer everybody to enjoy lives of grinding medieval poverty.

Versus:

Guess which one most people choose? So, now you know why the left hates markets.

Now, people may talk about climate change like it would drive us to extinction, but what's really going to extinctify us is that the fact that most humans just aren't sexually attracted to most other humans.

The closest thing to an answer the left has come up with is....Uncompetitive. Their plan is to have feminists use nagging to socially engineer men into believing that fertile women are ugly. "Real women have curves" they say, usually shouted by women who have....Not so much "curves", as one single "diameter".

They don't complain about Ken Dolls being unrealistically chiseled, or demand that Hollywood give more representation to pudgy, jiggle-tit pajama boys, in hopes of socially engineering women into finding THEM attractive. Therefore the movement doesn't even count as a serious attempt to address the extinction-by-pickiness problem.

"Real Dodos have curves, you disgusting neckbeard! I wouldn't date you if you where the last male dodo on earth! The Future is female! 3 WORD CHANT! 3 WORD CHANT!"

South Korea, which doesn't have enough obesity to cause feminism to gain critical mass, (see what I did there?) found a technological solution.

It turns out that, with enough development, cosmetic surgery doesn't have to be the leatherface/frankenstien/spraytan nightmare of western infamy. In Korea they use cosmetic surgery like makeup.

The left complains about the "unnerving uniformity" of Korean faces, as if ugly people should live miserable lives in the name of providing varied crowd scenery for yuppy clickbait writers.

"Too many Barbie dolls, not enough Garbage Pail Kids!"

The left might accept cosmetic surgery if you tell them that trannies like it, but they'll just come up with another demographic double standard. After all, socially engineering human sexual attraction is the same as gay conversion therapy. So can you socially engineer human sexual attraction or not? Well, it depends on if you're talking about a political pander-target or not.

Feminists don't want to repeat the mistake they made when they failed to ban labor-saving home appliances. This outcompeted their proposal, which was to build the utopias described in feminist science fiction.

Some highlights:

Originally Posted by early feminist science fiction authors

eugenics...a narrow waist is considered a "disgusting deformity"...state socialism. Men are allowed to live on the island, but cannot hold political office... euthanasia, eliminating malformed children — and bastards. They maintain their superiority by practicing "nerve-rejuvenation," in which the life energy of dogs is transferred to humans....

...a women-only world...no longer enslaved by pregnancy and childbirth thanks to artificial incubators...asexual creation...growth and development of embryos occur without fertilization by sperm...

...a single-sex world... men are locked away...slave-owning monarchy...unable to reproduce, so infants are purchased from a neighbouring tribe...

...an all-female "utopia"...practice eugenics; all of them are blonde "Aryans," who disdain people of darker skin...The remaining men were mostly slaves...no experience or cultural memory of romantic love or sexual intercourse....

Uh, thanks but no thanks, I'll take the Maytag washer/dryer combo and the Dyson vac, thanks.