[MitzaLizalor]

I was surprised not to see the word "context" in there. We know that how words are used and what words mean are two different things; water is a good example. Satanic water is everywhere. Of itself, as you suggest, water is probably neutral. What we're talking about here is how it's used.

Jesus’ baptism was done using water. Not magic water, just ordinary water. There are some very wicked people in the world as a glance at any newspaper will show any day you care to pick one up, some of whom do not treat water as a neutral substance. They believe and use underhand techniques to indoctrinate their children into believing that "magic" can be imparted to water. Catholics. Satanists. Mormons. Chinese water torture proponents. There's probably bottles of "magic" infusions for sale in crystal shops. It's the context having the effect, not the water.

Satanic fools use their water for its non-existent properties as part of the indoctrination "sacrament", in "magic" rituals, in attempts to infect deceased persons with their vile doctrines, to drip by drip insinuate nonsense to elicit false confessions of faith, even to "contact" angels. But no contact made in that way is angelic. How can it be?

As you see, it's the context having the effect, not the water itself. Which is why I'm surprised you didn't use the word. It would actually have been appropriate.