Quote:
Originally Posted by handmaiden
I'm worried that the Army still has bigger and better weapons. Why can private citizens own rapid-fire guns but not bombs?
Every time a person even looks into bomb-making or bomb-buying, the Federal Busybody Informants start messing around in their lives.
Do we or do we not have a Second Amendment? What right has the gov'mint got to draw the line--any line--between acceptable and non-acceptable weapons?
Can I own a grenade-launcher? (Seriously, I don't know. My forte is obscure Bible references.) How about a Howitzer? What exactly IS a howitzer and should it be capitalized in written form or not?
Those are great questions, Sister Handmaiden. Some of them involve the strategy of our citizen's army. For example, would it be better to have Howitzers and such, or, block streets and airport runways with thousands of children so the Army could not use them to move its weapons into place? We need to think about all of these issues.
I need these questions answered if I intend to shop around for a local militia. This is one of those very rare subject areas where one must range far afield of the Bible for answers, so I am completely out of my depth.
And now I am wondering about depth-chargers.
|
You raise good questions, Sister Handmaiden. Some of your questions involve the general strategy our citizen's army will use. For example, would it be better to acquire big guns like Howitzers, or, to simply pack airport runways and interstates with children so the government could not use them to move their weapons around?
We will all need to pray for guidance about these decisions.