Of course Clinton didn't try to appeal to white males. She would fail. White males, the demographic that the founders of this great nation intended to have voting rights, rejected Hillary Clinton in overwhelming numbers. Had this been an election where only the people the founders intended to be able to vote were able to vote, they'd be able to see through her lies, corruption and dishonesty in a heartbeat and she would have never even made it past the primaries.
Here's the funny part though, not only did she not even try to appeal to white male voters, but she even failed at appealing to the voters whom she was supposed to appeal to.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...nd-female-vot/
Quote:
Although last night's exit polls do show that 54 per cent of women backed Clinton compared to 42 per cent for Trump, these numbers were not significantly different from how women voted in 2012.
In the 2012 presidential race, 55 per cent of women backed Obama while 44 per cent backed Romney.
|
Despite her best attempts to pander to women voters, despite being the first woman to receive a major party nomination, and despite actually having Barack Obama's endorsement, and despite supposedly being the champion to women, she actually did
worse among women voters than Barack Obama. Let that sink in.
Quote:
Again, things didn't go as well for Clinton as she would have hoped. Exit polls show that Clinton's support among Hispanic voters was just 65 per cent, down from Obama's 71 per cent in 2012.
Meanwhile support among Hispanic voters was actually higher for Trump, at 29 per cent, compared to the 27 per cent Romney secured four years ago.
|
Now naturally, with illegal Mexican rapists flooding across our borders in massive number, the Republican candidate is going to do worse than the Democrat. To any liberals who think that doesn't happen, if you don't believe me, maybe you'd believe Obama, who is on tape encouraging illegal immigrants to vote
http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/obama-enc...liens-to-vote/ and telling them that there'd be no repercussions for doing so. He must have been really desperate to admit that out in the open.
But here's the kicker, Trump actually performed
better among Latinos than Romney did! Why? Because of what Trump was saying from the start. He's going to (and now did)
WIN with Latinos. All that supposed talk about how he was alienating Latinos, and he didn't alienate them at all. He performed better than the previous candidate. The Latinos who come here legally who are law abiding probably all agree with Trump: The illegals have got to go. The illegals which Democrats bribe to come over will vote Democrat no matter what.
Gore made a big fuss about the 2000 election, demanding recount after recount. Wonder why Hillary isn't? Because she knows she lost by a massive
landslide, and all performing a recount would do is further diminish her own sinking poll numbers. Trump even performed better among black voters than Romney and McCain! Face it liberals, Trump is winning with everyone. He won the presidency, his leadership won congress for us, and he's going to win back the Supreme Court for us, no matter how many of Hillary's paid protesters try to convince you otherwise.
It's ironic how all these liberals want to head over to Canada. Why don't you ever hear about liberals moving to Mexico? I mean, they're not racists, are they? I'm sure it's perfectly safe, run well, and not filled with rapists or murders at all.