[Bjorn Jensen]

Look, I'm not a racist or nazi or anything like that, but seeing these pictures made me think a little bit






We have been taught that these men were brave heroes. But have we ever been thinking of why they actually did this? I just found out, they did this to liberate France from the nazi occupation. My question is now, was it a just cause to help the French? Why should France be allowed to have its own government (other than the short-lived Vichy regime, the only somewhat decent government the French ever had, naturally it was in the South)

What if the occupation government, a right-wing one, actually functioned better than the government they had before it? What if, these soldiers were just some alt-left thugs, the antifa of their time considering they violently attacked a democratically elected conservative right-wing regime without permit? I mean many of those soldiers were even negroes.

As PRESIDENT Trump says, there are always 2 sides of the story. And so it appears to be with this story!

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by Bjorn Jensen

What if the occupation government, a right-wing one, actually functioned better than the government they had before it? What if, these soldiers were just some alt-left thugs, the antifa of their time considering they violently attacked a democratically elected conservative right-wing regime without permit? I mean many of those soldiers were even negroes.
As PRESIDENT Trump says, there are always 2 sides of the story. And so it appears to be with this story!

Clear thinking, Brother Jesen--It could well be French people would be happier today drinking stiff German beer than they are sipping wine with their pinkie fingers pointed out. One who saw the mistake of going to war with the Germans was none other than American hero, Charles Lindbergh. He could not see the point of us shooting white Christians while the Jews and yellow people sat and watched.

"These wars in Europe are not wars in which our civilization is defending itself against some Asiatic intruder."

[Titus Templeton]

Don't forget that the French used terrorism against the occupying Germans.So as shocking as it sounds the French were the ISIS of the 1940's.

[Bjorn Jensen]

Did you know that France was named after the Franks (a Germanic people)? So who is to say that France should not be a part of Germany? In this way, it could be said that the German rule over France during the war was actually their legitimate government after hundreds of years of French occupation, an occupation that still goes on today.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Some say that all Hitler was trying to do was make an EU - which is now seemingly being presided over by Frau Merkel out of Berlin (of all places). It also seems that France's new President Macron has been hit by his latest scandal - spending over $30,000 on makeup during his first 3 months in office. Frau Merkel may have to send in some troops to march under the Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile and straighten the place out.

Then there is the looming problem with Poland, who is refusing to take their assigned quota of mooselimbs. Frau Merkel may need to send some Junkers Ju 87 "Stuka" dive bombers in to restore order. Of course Merkel has her own problems after taking in millions of mooselimbs - she may be looking for some Lebensraum.

Which brings us to our American hero, Charles Lindbergh and his reluctance to get involved with the Europeans. Now many will point out that most of us are descendants from Europe and should rightly be called "Euro-Americans" - but whatever you decide to call yourself (and now we're told we can "identify" with anything we want), at least our ancestors had the intelligence and common sense to get the hell out.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Roosevelt was the original alt-left thug. Just look at the senseless vandalism they committed against historical statues:

The swastika is about heritage, not hate!