Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold
Good one Sister Mitza. Did one kill Jesus and the other not???
|
My best guess is "Literally Jewish" is someone who is not Jewish, but reads a lot of Jewish "literature".
It does not fit Jesus description, though.
Hey, I thought the issue of Jesus not having Mary's and/or Joseph's DNA was already established, but here we go again. Jesus is the son of God. NOT OF HUMANS. He only used Mary as a subrogate. Why? We don't know, and we don't ask. Jesus could have "literally" been born out of a rock. Or in a bigger Empire (chinese). Or in Rome.
Or God could have come Himself. And say to everyone "Hey I am thy God, I am the Light and create Evil" to everyone. He chose to whisper that into Moses. Misterious ways, you know?
Jesus could have been purple if He wanted to. It does not take more power to transform yourself into purple than to transform water into wine, or to multiply the fishes.
I am sure God had His reasons to make things in a certain way. I am not to question God. I am to obey God.
I am also sure that you as an atheist can understand how the debate of the color of Jesus' skin is only motivated by racism. You want to "demote" our God because Him having a brown child. That is racist. We could not care less about Jesus color, He just happened to be white. In the same way white gardeners are not forbidden, they just happen to be brown. Or cotton pickers are mostly black. We are color blind: there is no Greek nor Jew, you know? Read your Bible again.