|
|
|
|
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
|
|
Posts: 23
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: South America
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-01-2015, 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Etheldreda
We have a mission from God to baptize all the nations of the earth (Matthew 28:16-20). Our good pastor needs to get their in reliable style. We don't want the Good Lord to look bad, now do we?
|
You already make him look bad, you use the bible and his name to be cruel, nasty and hate another people, also, you treat women like shit, you are also violent with children and love to play the victim all the time, saying the whole world is against you
|
|
Putting the "stud" back in Bible Study
|
|
Posts: 79,909
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-01-2015, 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningMyMouth
You already make him look bad, you use the bible and his name to be cruel, nasty and hate another people, also, you treat women like shit, you are also violent with children and love to play the victim all the time, saying the whole world is against you
|
Why are you still here, whore? Don't you have tortillas to make?
Here is a partial list from just a few scripture verses:
Hypocrites (Matthew 24:51), The Unforgiving (Mark 11:26), Homosexuals (Romans 1:26, 27), Fornicators (Romans 1:29), The Wicked (Romans 1:29), The Covetous (Romans 1:29), The Malicious (Romans 1:29), The Envious (Romans 1:29), Murderers (Romans 1:29), The Deceitful (Romans 1:29), Backbiters (Romans 1:30), Haters of God (Romans 1:30), The Despiteful (Romans 1:30), The Proud (Romans 1:30), Boasters (Romans 1:30), Inventors of evil (Romans 1:30), Disobedient to parents (Romans 1:30), Covenant breakers (Romans 1:31), The Unmerciful (Romans 1:31), The Implacable (Romans 1:31), The Unrighteous (1Corinthians 6:9), Idolaters (1Corinthians 6:9), Adulterers (1Corinthians 6:9), The Effeminate (1Corinthians 6:9), Thieves (1Corinthians 6:10), Drunkards (1Corinthians 6:10), Reviler (1Corinthians 6:10), Extortioners (1Corinthians 6:10), The Fearful (Revelation 21:8), The Unbelieving (Revelation 21:8), The Abominable (Revelation 21:8), Whoremongers (Revelation 21:8), Sorcerers (Revelation 21:8), All Liars (Revelation 21:8)
|
|
Is a good, decent True Christian™ lady
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 11,343
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 39.373117/-76.472688
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-08-2015, 04:54 PM
Wow! that was such an inspiring sermon, Pastor Zeke! There is nothing more important than instructing a delusional world in the real message of the Bible.
It's funny how people can read some simple black text set out on a white page and instead of actually looking at what it says, they bring such broad, slanted interpretations to those words.
In a somewhat related note, I think it's funny how people get all misty about the image of Jesus as "The Good Shepherd". Naturally, if Jesus ever did tend any sheep, He would be excellent at it. He would definitely protect those sheep against any accidents or predation and keep them fed and watered.
He would also shear them regularly and sell the wool, arrange for the more worthly males to mate with the females ( while cutting off the testicles of the unworthy ones )and slit the throats of the appropriate number of them on a regular basis. Then, of course, he would butcher the animals carefully so as to avoid tainting the meat. All the different parts of the sheep would be intelligently used to maximize its full economic value.
It seems silly to think that Jesus as a Good Shepherd would spend all his time hoisting cute little baby lambs onto his shoulders and chucking them under their little lamb chins with a smile. Sheep are livestock that need to be managed to benefit the shepherd. By that same standard, people are the property of God and He has every right to do what He needs to do with them in order to continue maintaining His world in good, Godly order.
Ipso facto, God and His Word are Sacred, everything else needs to be sorted, valued and handled in accordance to His Word.
Non-sheepishly Yours,
Handmaiden
His left hand should be under my head, and his right hand should embrace me.
Guns For God and the Economy
|
|
Unsaved trash, obese demon
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 16
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: in bed with my fag boyfriend
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:19 PM
Here's a moral dilemma for you:
A homosexual fetus: let it live as a homosexual, or kill it before it's born?
This space is reserved for KJV1611 Holy Scripture only - ADMIN
|
|
South of the Border outreach program True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 13,142
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Godly Midwest
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Liberty
Here's a moral dilemma for you:
A homosexual fetus: let it live as a homosexual, or kill it before it's born?
|
Hi sweetie, which part of "Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept" don't you understand?
2 Kings 15:16 Then Menahem smote Tiphsah, and all that were therein, and the coasts thereof from Tirzah: because they opened not to him, therefore he smote it; and all the women therein that were with child he ripped up.
Hosea 13:16 Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
|
|
Unsaved trash, obese demon
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 16
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: in bed with my fag boyfriend
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilissa
Hi sweetie, which part of "Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept" don't you understand?
2 Kings 15:16 Then Menahem smote Tiphsah, and all that were therein, and the coasts thereof from Tirzah: because they opened not to him, therefore he smote it; and all the women therein that were with child he ripped up.
Hosea 13:16 Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
|
Then wouldn't that mean getting an abortion?
This space is reserved for KJV1611 Holy Scripture only - ADMIN
|
|
South of the Border outreach program True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 13,142
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Godly Midwest
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Liberty
Then wouldn't that mean getting an abortion?
|
Technically, I'm not sure it that still is an abortion if the mother is killed at the same time? You might want to check with a Pastor on this.
|
|
Gushing for Jesus
|
|
Posts: 23,730
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Liberty
Here's a moral dilemma for you:
A homosexual fetus: let it live as a homosexual, or kill it before it's born?
|
It's not a moral dilemma for those who know how to properly train up a child. Cranky Old Man explains how: Start hitting your child with a rod 16 weeks before birth!
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.
|
|
Unsaved trash, obese demon
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 16
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: in bed with my fag boyfriend
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilissa
Technically, I'm not sure it that still is an abortion if the mother is killed at the same time? You might want to check with a Pastor on this.
|
Or maybe someone who's got a medical degree and is authorized to make such decisions, such as your local gynecologist
This space is reserved for KJV1611 Holy Scripture only - ADMIN
|
|
South of the Border outreach program True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 13,142
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Godly Midwest
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Liberty
Or maybe someone who's got a medical degree and is authorized to make such decisions, such as your local gynecologist
|
Do you really think that a "local gynecologist" would know the Bible deeply enough to determine whether ripping a baby out of mother's belly (and allowing the mother to live afterwards) is OK in the eyes of God?
I doubt it.
|
|
Gushing for Jesus
|
|
Posts: 23,730
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
10-08-2015, 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Liberty
Or maybe someone who's got a medical degree and is authorized to make such decisions, such as your local gynecologist
|
Jesus is the only physician a True Christian™ woman needs.
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.
|
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 75
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Noneofya Business
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 02:40 AM
There's only one thing I know, and that is: God is the only one who knows a person's soul. And just because people's lives don't matter to you all, doesn't mean they don't matter to me. Personally, I find humans to be interesting, unique, and irreplaceable, and I will personally stand to protect them from any who may try to destroy them. If I die, so be it; at least I'll have died doing what I loved, and will go to heaven, or if that happens to not be real, then a void of nothingness like an eternal sleep. I commend my soul to God and the winds of fate. Amen.
Life is a cage, death is the key, all your drugs are belong to me.
... so then I can sell them to braindead lunatics, to get money, to buy guns, to spread capitalism.
|
|
Curry slurping demon
|
|
Posts: 323
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Godless Scotland
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche_Locke
There's only one thing I know, and that is: God is the only one who knows a person's soul. And just because people's lives don't matter to you all, doesn't mean they don't matter to me. Personally, I find humans to be interesting, unique, and irreplaceable, and I will personally stand to protect them from any who may try to destroy them. If I die, so be it; at least I'll have died doing what I loved, and will go to heaven, or if that happens to not be real, then a void of nothingness like an eternal sleep. I commend my soul to God and the winds of fate. Amen.
|
Yes, Mr. Locke, it is I Harsha Shah here and I am engaging you. Yes, you are seeming to be an interesting person, a sad and beautiful person, yes. I am hoping that I am not offending you but I am asking you some questions, yes. I am also giving you some background, I am teaching RME that is religious and moral education to my young pupils here in Edinburgh and I am also a recovering Jainist that is currently not practicing any religions although I am practicing vegetarianism and ahimsa, yes.
Yes, I am thinking that you are stating that your god knows our innermost thoughts and in another thread that your bible was produced by your god. I am inquiring how can you be knowing this? You are not providing evidence but you are providing your opinion. I am thinking that I might be offending you but why should I be trusting you and not these christians on this forum who are providing me with biblical verses as evidence, yes, I am now sure that I am offending you and them but I am thinking that these verses are low-level evidence and you are not providing even them, yes?
Yes, are you being familiar with the tale of the blind men and the elephant, Mr. Locke? Yes?
"Ecclesiastes 3:7
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak."Yes. Women are saving lives. It is time we are speaking! Yes!
|
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 75
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Noneofya Business
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 04:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harsha Shah
Yes, Mr. Locke, it is I Harsha Shah here and I am engaging you. Yes, you are seeming to be an interesting person, a sad and beautiful person, yes. I am hoping that I am not offending you but I am asking you some questions, yes. I am also giving you some background, I am teaching RME that is religious and moral education to my young pupils here in Edinburgh and I am also a recovering Jainist that is currently not practicing any religions although I am practicing vegetarianism and ahimsa, yes.
Yes, I am thinking that you are stating that your god knows our innermost thoughts and in another thread that your bible was produced by your god. I am inquiring how can you be knowing this? You are not providing evidence but you are providing your opinion. I am thinking that I might be offending you but why should I be trusting you and not these Christians on this forum who are providing me with biblical verses as evidence, yes, I am now sure that I am offending you and them but I am thinking that these verses are low-level evidence and you are not providing even them, yes?
Yes, are you being familiar with the tale of the blind men and the elephant, Mr. Locke? Yes?
|
First of all, it would be Miss Locke, although it doesn't matter too much. As for verses to support me... the folks at Answers in Genesis state the basics pretty well. Anything I say would just be quoted from their website, so I won't bother. Suffice to say, there's plenty of evidence that the bible is divinely inspired. As for God speaking to us... John 10:27-28, My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.
Jeremiah 33:3, Call to me and I will answer you, and will tell you great and hidden things that you have not known.
Genesis 26:5, Because Abraham obeyed my voice and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.”
If we take the bible to be true, then there is plenty of evidence to be found therein that God speaks to us.
Life is a cage, death is the key, all your drugs are belong to me.
... so then I can sell them to braindead lunatics, to get money, to buy guns, to spread capitalism.
|
|
Curry slurping demon
|
|
Posts: 323
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Godless Scotland
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 05:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche_Locke
First of all, it would be Miss Locke, although it doesn't matter too much. As for verses to support me... the folks at Answers in Genesis state the basics pretty well. Anything I say would just be quoted from their website, so I won't bother. Suffice to say, there's plenty of evidence that the bible is divinely inspired. As for God speaking to us... John 10:27-28, My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.
Jeremiah 33:3, Call to me and I will answer you, and will tell you great and hidden things that you have not known.
Genesis 26:5, Because Abraham obeyed my voice and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.”
If we take the bible to be true, then there is plenty of evidence to be found therein that God speaks to us.
|
Yes, Miss Locke, I am very sorry that I was offending you by assuming that you were a young male, yes. This was because you are writing exactly in the same self-assured style as my 13 year-old boy pupils in early puberty. Yes. I am appreciating that you were copying some bible verses and the link but the academic community is not considering those as hard evidence. I could also be saying that the Jaina Sutras provide evidence for their own truth value but that would be doing circular reasoning, yes? I am not bothering sending you the links nor writing that stuff because apparently that is the way you are also discussing things, and I hope that I am not offending you. Yes, there is also lots of opposing evidence of bible stories that would not be true, and I am certain that you know of this criticism so I am not bothering you by quoting them or linking them. What are you thinking about them? I am thinking that looking at your own ideas in a critical manner might be offending your psyche but I am hoping that you would be an open-minded person, yes? This was Harsha Shah answering your nice post, yes.
"Ecclesiastes 3:7
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak."Yes. Women are saving lives. It is time we are speaking! Yes!
|
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 75
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Noneofya Business
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 05:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harsha Shah
Yes, Miss Locke, I am very sorry that I was offending you by assuming that you were a young male, yes. This was because you are writing exactly in the same self-assured style as my 13 year-old boy pupils in early puberty. Yes. I am appreciating that you were copying some bible verses and the link but the academic community is not considering those as hard evidence. I could also be saying that the Jaina Sutras provide evidence for their own truth value but that would be doing circular reasoning, yes? I am not bothering sending you the links nor writing that stuff because apparently that is the way you are also discussing things, and I hope that I am not offending you. Yes, there is also lots of opposing evidence of bible stories that would not be true, and I am certain that you know of this criticism so I am not bothering you by quoting them or linking them. What are you thinking about them? I am thinking that looking at your own ideas in a critical manner might be offending your psyche but I am hoping that you would be an open-minded person, yes? This was Harsha Shah answering your nice post, yes.
|
My confidence does tend to catch people off-guard. Interesting that you say the academic community does not consider these to be hard evidence; this leaves us with two possibilities. The first is that the academic community is wrong on the matter, and the second is that the bible is wrong. In my opinion, it's a mixture between the two. The academic community disregards AiG's work offhandedly because it is religious in nature. At the same time, belief in the bible takes faith, and faith is not something that can be explained away with facts. You have to make up your own mind about putting faith in something. I will say again, this is my opinion more than anything. But at the end of the day, most things are more or less based on opinion. No one can tell you what to choose, you must do that for yourself. It's both terrifying and exhilarating when you realize just how much you are on your own, making your own choices. Personally? I would recommend continuing without a religion for a while longer. I would also recommend spending minimal time here, and taking most things they say here with a pinch of salt.
Cheers, Blanche Locke.
Life is a cage, death is the key, all your drugs are belong to me.
... so then I can sell them to braindead lunatics, to get money, to buy guns, to spread capitalism.
|
|
Curry slurping demon
|
|
Posts: 323
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Godless Scotland
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche_Locke
Interesting that you say the academic community does not consider these to be hard evidence; this leaves us with two possibilities. The first is that the academic community is wrong on the matter, and the second is that the bible is wrong.
|
Yes, Miss Locke, I am happy that you are answering my questions. I am hoping that I am not offending you but how are you telling when the bible is correct and when it is not??
Quote:
belief in the bible takes faith, and faith is not something that can be explained away with facts. You have to make up your own mind about putting faith in something. I will say again, this is my opinion more than anything. But at the end of the day, most things are more or less based on opinion.
|
Yes, Miss Locke, I am seeing that you are thinking about these things a lot and I am appreciating that. Yes, I am thinking that things are not quite as obscure as you are stating, yes. People have been inventing things and one one them is the concept of probability, yes. Some things can be believed by a higher degree of confidence based on past probability, yes. I am hoping that I am not offending you. I am thinking that unless you are falling into hard solipsism, you are operating in the world based on these different levels of confidence. I am also thinking that many of the things that the writers of the bible or even the Jaina Sutras have been describing fall into the category of very low prior probability. Yes, these things are the miracles and the resurrections and the claims without evidence.
Yes, while I am thinking that I could be offending you, it really is not only about opinion. Yes, it is the level of confidence and and how you are testing your levels of confidence. You have been explaining what you are believing but your why is remaining a bit obscure. Yes, if you are believing simply based on opinion, the level of confidence is not high enough for me to be accepting that. It is like the story of the blind men and the elephant. One is feeling its belly and experiencing how the elephant is nice and warm and seeming safe and another one is touching the tusks and thinking that they are dangerous spears. Yes, the bible is the elephant. Who is seeing the whole elephant is the question?
And, yes, who is the one is seeing that around the elephant is the niche of its surroundings and around that is the vaste space of wonders, yes? I am sure that I am offending you, but the science really is looking at the surroundings and the elephant and while it is making an opinion, it is looking at many more things and the confidence level is becoming better and better. They are beginning to see, perhaps, yes.
Why are you believing that there is a biblical god? If it is being an opinion, how are you testing the probability and confidence level of this opinion, yes?
"Ecclesiastes 3:7
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak."Yes. Women are saving lives. It is time we are speaking! Yes!
|
|
Unsaved trash, Arrogant Atheist Dick
|
|
Posts: 14,451
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The other end of the internet
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 06:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche_Locke
My confidence does tend to catch people off-guard...
|
Confidence based on ignorance is arrogance. You and Donald J. have a lot in common.
|
|
Mayor of Freehold
|
|
Posts: 12,123
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: City Hall, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche_Locke
My confidence does tend to catch people off-guard. .... I would also recommend spending minimal time here, and taking most things they say here with a pinch of salt.
Cheers, Blanche Locke.
|
Miss Block, those of us here who have been awarded the status of True Christian™ have years of experience with others who arrive at Landover Baptist. It is obvious to me you are struggling with your soul and use a veneer of confidence to mask your insecurities.
Only by accepting Jesus and His Bible as the ultimate source of truth can one become confident. We urge you to repent of your sins and become the person you can be, confident and brave. Our pastors stand ready to help.
Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.
|
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 75
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Noneofya Business
|
|
Re: Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept -
08-18-2021, 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harsha Shah
Yes, Miss Locke, I am happy that you are answering my questions. I am hoping that I am not offending you but how are you telling when the bible is correct and when it is not??Yes, Miss Locke, I am seeing that you are thinking about these things a lot and I am appreciating that. Yes, I am thinking that things are not quite as obscure as you are stating, yes. People have been inventing things and one one them is the concept of probability, yes. Some things can be believed by a higher degree of confidence based on past probability, yes. I am hoping that I am not offending you. I am thinking that unless you are falling into hard solipsism, you are operating in the world based on these different levels of confidence. I am also thinking that many of the things that the writers of the bible or even the Jaina Sutras have been describing fall into the category of very low prior probability. Yes, these things are the miracles and the resurrections and the claims without evidence.
Yes, while I am thinking that I could be offending you, it really is not only about opinion. Yes, it is the level of confidence and and how you are testing your levels of confidence. You have been explaining what you are believing but your why is remaining a bit obscure. Yes, if you are believing simply based on opinion, the level of confidence is not high enough for me to be accepting that. It is like the story of the blind men and the elephant. One is feeling its belly and experiencing how the elephant is nice and warm and seeming safe and another one is touching the tusks and thinking that they are dangerous spears. Yes, the bible is the elephant. Who is seeing the whole elephant is the question?
And, yes, who is the one is seeing that around the elephant is the niche of its surroundings and around that is the vast space of wonders, yes? I am sure that I am offending you, but the science really is looking at the surroundings and the elephant and while it is making an opinion, it is looking at many more things and the confidence level is becoming better and better. They are beginning to see, perhaps, yes.
Why are you believing that there is a biblical god? If it is being an opinion, how are you testing the probability and confidence level of this opinion, yes?
|
You don't have to worry about offending me, hun <3
I never said that I disregard science. On the contrary, I have great respect for the knowledge and advancements that the scientific community has brought to us. At the same time... let's not forget the difference between historical science and observational science. Observational science refers to science that is repeatable and verifiable and thus falsifiable with the senses. This type of science is what takes place today. It can be empirically tested thus can be known. Historical science, on the other hand, is an investigation of the past. The past is something that is not repeatable or verifiable with the senses thus it cannot be falsifiable. Since it cannot be empirically tested, it cannot be known.
Luckily, we have something that tells us exactly what happened. If you go from the assumption of there being a creator god, as described in the holy bible, then everything falls into place.
Apologies for the shortness of my answers right now, but I'm not in the best condition. Late night last night, and too much caffiene today.
Cheers, Blanche Locke.
Life is a cage, death is the key, all your drugs are belong to me.
... so then I can sell them to braindead lunatics, to get money, to buy guns, to spread capitalism.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|