[refridgerator]

Trump Praises North Korea's Kim as ‘Very Honorable’



The Trump of God?

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by refridgerator

Trump Praises North Korea's Kim as ‘Very Honorable’



The Trump of God?

I see that you are as disappointed as I am, that the possibility of the planet Earth going out with a nuclear bang seems to be getting slimmer.

Don't worry too much, though - the Apocalypse will happen one way or another.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Originally Posted by refridgerator

Trump Praises North Korea's Kim as ‘Very Honorable’



The Trump of God?

Don't kid yourself - before it's all over Trump will convert Kim Jong Un into a Juchie Capitalist.

North Korea in no time will be selling Juchie refrigerators and other appliances at your local Home Depot, Chick-fil-A will be granted a franchise to feed North Korea's starving people, and Kim Jong Un's all girl Moranbong Band will be selling their songs on Apple iTunes, playing to sold out concerts at Carnegie Hall, and featured at Trump MAGA rallies.

Un will also be taking Bernie Sanders off our hands and will become the Ambassador to North Korea.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan

Don't kid yourself - before it's all over Trump will convert Kim Jong Un into a Juchie Capitalist...

Maybe we can even look forward to the end of this "anime" fad? Naruto, Avatar the Last Airbender, and current millennial favorite, Family Guy, are all terrible influences on our youth. I pray our soon-to-be friendly status with Korea will bring blessings to both sides of the ocean.

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by Mary Etheldreda

Maybe we can even look forward to the end of this "anime" fad? Naruto, Avatar the Last Airbender, and current millennial favorite, Family Guy, are all terrible influences on our youth. I pray our soon-to-be friendly status with Korea will bring blessings to both sides of the ocean.

Anime doesn't come from Korea, It comes from Japan.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

Anime doesn't come from Korea, It comes from Japan.

North Korean anime:

[anthonyijackson]

But the thing is, most popular anime that gets attention here in the states comes from Japan, like Naruto. Not only that, but Avatar the Last Airbender and Family are produced here in America, which makes them not anime. I'm not trying to be a know-it-all here, I just don't want Mrs. Etherelda to get her hopes up for no reason.

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

I'm not trying to be a know-it-all here, I just don't want Mrs. Etherelda to get her hopes up for no reason.

Sorry, Mrs. Etheldreda***

[Thomas Taylor]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

But the thing is, most popular anime that gets attention here in the states comes from Japan, like Naruto. Not only that, but Avatar the Last Airbender and Family are produced here in America, which makes them not anime. I'm not trying to be a know-it-all here, I just don't want Mrs. Etherelda to get her hopes up for no reason.

Mrs. Jackson,


Your statement would indicate that you are, indeed, trying to be a know it all.


Proverbs 12:23 - A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.


I understand that you have probably only been able to avail of an inner city education, but letting everyone see it is just foolishness.


YIC
TT

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by Thomas Taylor

Mrs. Jackson,


Your statement would indicate that you are, indeed, trying to be a know it all.


Proverbs 12:23 - A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.


I understand that you have probably only been able to avail of an inner city education, but letting everyone see it is just foolishness.


YIC
TT

I'm not a girl and I'm not married, so stop calling me Mrs. Jackson. My name is Anthony. To assume I've only been allowed an inner city education or to assume that I live in the inner city is racist. That verse would make sense to use in this context had I said anything that was incorrect.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

I'm not a girl and I'm not married, so stop calling me Mrs. Jackson. My name is Anthony. To assume I've only been allowed an inner city education or to assume that I live in the inner city is racist. That verse would make sense to use in this context had I said anything that was incorrect.

Why is it racist to live in the CBD?

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Why is it racist to live in the CBD?

It's not racist to live there, it's racist to assume that I do because I'm black.

[MitzaLizalor]

I had not made that assumption.

The Bible, which is very plain in its language, makes its meaning abundantly clear. Since it is the only source explaining the message of Salvation that clarity is essential. If it were not so people could go off thinking that homosexuals may be eligible or that worshipping large goblin statues was no barrier when in fact the opposite is true. Thus what you said in an earlier post is incorrect.

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

I had not made that assumption.

The Bible, which is very plain in its language, makes its meaning abundantly clear. Since it is the only source explaining the message of Salvation that clarity is essential. If it were not so people could go off thinking that homosexuals may be eligible or that worshipping large goblin statues was no barrier when in fact the opposite is true. Thus what you said in an earlier post is incorrect.

When did I ever say that?

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

When did I ever say that?

In this post. You were commenting on

I Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

. . . . .and

Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

You had responded that

Both quotes specify only man and woman, so if we are going in literal terms the second quote is telling me that it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman, and not if a man looks upon a man or a woman looks upon a woman with lust. I'm not sure if i got the point I have in mind across effectively but know that I tried my best.

The Bible does not teach that it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman. For example in Deuteronomy it's made clear that bearing false witness against one's neighbour is also a sin and in Amos accepting bribes is presented, by God, as sinful too.

Amos 5:12 For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.

Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour.

Taking a verse stating that one thing is a sin, in your example a man coveting a woman, does not mean there are no other sins. Jesus was pointing out that the thought is the crime as much as the action. He was not saying that there are no other sins. My response was simply to quote the verses contradicting what you had suggested.

Homosexuals are commanded to be dealt with in very specific ways in The Bible. If you think God was wrong in that I guess you could say that God's definitions of sin were incorrect. But since sin is what God defines as sinful, you can't announce that something spelled out by God as a sin is not a sin. It's a sin because God has said so.

Homosexuality, idolatry, lust, bribery, perjury, all equally defined as sins. You were saying The Bible got it wrong. That means God got it wrong. If that's what you think why even bother with God at all?

[Barry]

Well I say three cheers for the very brave man who's agreed to meet the deranged, mad, meglomaniac, face to face. Kim Chi deserves a meddle for valour.




Ooops, I got that wrong. What I meant to say is President Trump deserves a medal of valour.

[Barry]

Prayer request.


I call on all my brethren here at Landover, to join with me in prayer for the safety of President Trump when he meats this deranged gook, nut job.


Kim Chi is so volatile, he might decide to bomb the ocean again.

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

In this post. You were commenting on

I Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

. . . . .and

Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

You had responded thatThe Bible does not teach that it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman. For example in Deuteronomy it's made clear that bearing false witness against one's neighbour is also a sin and in Amos accepting bribes is presented, by God, as sinful too.

Amos 5:12 For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.

Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour.

Taking a verse stating that one thing is a sin, in your example a man coveting a woman, does not mean there are no other sins. Jesus was pointing out that the thought is the crime as much as the action. He was not saying that there are no other sins. My response was simply to quote the verses contradicting what you had suggested.

Homosexuals are commanded to be dealt with in very specific ways in The Bible. If you think God was wrong in that I guess you could say that God's definitions of sin were incorrect. But since sin is what God defines as sinful, you can't announce that something spelled out by God as a sin is not a sin. It's a sin because God has said so.

Homosexuality, idolatry, lust, bribery, perjury, all equally defined as sins. You were saying The Bible got it wrong. That means God got it wrong. If that's what you think why even bother with God at all?

But not only is that something I said in the past before I knew it was truly futile to argue scripture, but I was also corrected within that thread, so why bring it up?

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by anthonyijackson

But not only is that something I said in the past before I knew it was truly futile to argue scripture, but I was also corrected within that thread, so why bring it up?

I didn't. You did.

“..had I said anything that was incorrect.” is a claim about things you've said in the past, unless you were referring to things you've said in the future. And your claim was wrong. I have no idea why you brought that up especially regarding a Bible verse about proclaiming foolishness.

What you'd posted directly contradicted God and Proverbs 12:23 was appropriate for that reason.

Knowing that you needed to be corrected, that in fact you had been corrected, entails knowing you've said something that was incorrect. Of course we'd overlook that (perhaps you hadn't read Leviticus? or Romans? or Genesis? or I.&.II Kings?) once God's position on homosexuality was explained.

So I was surprised you brought the question up again.

[anthonyijackson]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

I didn't. You did.

“..had I said anything that was incorrect.” is a claim about things you've said in the past, unless you were referring to things you've said in the future. And your claim was wrong. I have no idea why you brought that up especially regarding a Bible verse about proclaiming foolishness.

What you'd posted directly contradicted God and Proverbs 12:23 was appropriate for that reason.

Knowing that you needed to be corrected, that in fact you had been corrected, entails knowing you've said something that was incorrect. Of course we'd overlook that (perhaps you hadn't read Leviticus? or Romans? or Genesis? or I.&.II Kings?) once God's position on homosexuality was explained.

So I was surprised you brought the question up again.

But that wasn't what I was trying to bring up. I was talking about the things I had said in THIS THREAD SPECIFICALLY. I don't know why I get misunderstood so much on these forums.