[Petal]

Mr.EvolutionMyAss kick evolutionist butts in this here videos

his account not been deliteds, an that mean that none of them evolutions folk been ables to answers his kwestions,yay!

[josh_cjr]

1. scientist have found missing links between animals thats why the theroy exists charles darwin didnt just have the idea pop into his head scientist
found these fossils and created the theroy of evolution. here are some of ur missing links you were talking about.
http://www.livescience.com/11326-top...ing-links.html

2. well when the earth had all the right conditions you know water, atmosphere, oxygen just the right living conditions life was formed.

3. thats a hard one the main theroy is the big bang theroy. there are over theroys out there but the most likely therory is that one.
and besides you said something can not come from nothing but isnt that exactly what "god" did, created something from nothing.

[wait_what]

Originally Posted by josh_cjr

1. scientist have found missing links between animals thats why the theroy exists charles darwin didnt just have the idea pop into his head scientist
found these fossils and created the theroy of evolution. here are some of ur missing links you were talking about.
http://www.livescience.com/11326-top...ing-links.html

2. well when the earth had all the right conditions you know water, atmosphere, oxygen just the right living conditions life was formed.

3. thats a hard one the main theroy is the big bang theroy. there are over theroys out there but the most likely therory is that one.
and besides you said something can not come from nothing but isnt that exactly what "god" did, created something from nothing.

1. So, where is the missing link between man and chimp?

2. Why is it we can't recreate this in a lab then? 4000 years of alchemy and chemistry, and still no neo-biogenesis.

3a. What is a theroy?

3b. God created the universe from His hands, not nothing. Silly atheists.

[Lanfeust]

Originally Posted by wait_what

1. So, where is the missing link between man and chimp?

2. Why is it we can't recreate this in a lab then? 4000 years of alchemy and chemistry, and still no neo-biogenesis.

3a. What is a theroy?

3b. God created the universe from His hands, not nothing. Silly atheists.

There is no missing link between man and chimpansee, because we and chimps have a common ancestor, if you simply read that theory a bit more seriously, you wouldn't ask so stupid questions. We don't decend from chimp but a now vanished species evolved in humans AND chimps.

Besides alchemy isn't a science practiced today.

A 'theroy' is something very different in the science world, a theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts (wikipedia, even wikipedia knows it better).

We have actually recreated the conditions in the beginning stage of the earth, there were some basic 'lifeforms' like proteins and RNA-strings. But you can read all about it in the scientific reports that can be verified and retested.

Also, it's not because something can't be explained naturally, that it is supernatural.

That's being just crazy, you can't always assume that all mysteries is god. It's just a question of time for being naturally answered like everything else.

Anyway, read some books, learn about it, THEN you complain.

[Titus Templeton]

I just want to say that there is no question who made the universe. The Bible Genesis 1:1 tells us that God made everything. Why bringing up questions which are already answered?

[Why_Lol]

Originally Posted by Titus Templeton

I just want to say that there is no question who made the universe. The Bible Genesis 1:1 tells us that God made everything. Why bringing up questions which are already answered?

So a book told you that god made everything? Well I read in a book that everything was created through a giant bird with magical powers does that make it true? You got some really great logic. /facepalm.

[wait_what]

Originally Posted by Lanfeust

There is no missing link between man and chimpansee, because we and chimps have a common ancestor, if you simply read that theory a bit more seriously, you wouldn't ask so stupid questions. We don't decend from chimp but a now vanished species evolved in humans AND chimps.

Besides alchemy isn't a science practiced today.

A 'theroy' is something very different in the science world, a theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts (wikipedia, even wikipedia knows it better).

We have actually recreated the conditions in the beginning stage of the earth, there were some basic 'lifeforms' like proteins and RNA-strings. But you can read all about it in the scientific reports that can be verified and retested.

Also, it's not because something can't be explained naturally, that it is supernatural.

That's being just crazy, you can't always assume that all mysteries is god. It's just a question of time for being naturally answered like everything else.

Anyway, read some books, learn about it, THEN you complain.

First, lying atheist, I am not complaining. You are the one getting her panties in a bunch.

Second, where is this common ancestor and how did he evolve twice? He had a tail and no tail at once? He was hairless and furry at the same time? You should see how silly your argument is.

Third, you gave me a definition for a "theory" not a "THEROY." Even so, by your own definition it is something that can be recreated
. Make evolution happen again, otherwise your "theory" has been scientifically proven false.

Fourth, alchemy is still being researched. elements are converted in nuclear chemistry all the time. it is where most of the bottom row, actinides, and lanthanides have come from.
biochemistry has yet to form cells from chemicals. you avoided the question like a coward.

how about you read a book? I call it the KJV 1611. Afterwards I might skim one of your propaganda rags just to show you how wrong you are.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by wait_what

1. So, where is the missing link between man and chimp?

There isn't a missing link between man and chimps because man didn't evolve from chimps. Instead we share a common ancestor.

[wait_what]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

There isn't a missing link between man and chimps because man didn't evolve from chimps. Instead we share a common ancestor.

See my above post. Anyways your broken view on evil-lution says it involves time travel. You are hardly an authority. You are just a lunatic witch sent to confuse the righteous and innocent.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by wait_what

See my above post. Anyways your broken view on evil-lution says it involves time travel. You are hardly an authority. You are just a lunatic witch sent to confuse the righteous and innocent.

I didn't say time travel was involved at all actually.
Basically when we say "one common ancestor" we mean that there was a species that both humans and apes evolved from. Say half the species went and lived in the jungle and the other half lived in the desert. Those in trees might keep their fur and continue to walk on four legs, whilst those in the deserts could keep cool by losing their hair, walking on two legs and developing darker skin to protect them from the sun (over many generations of course). Then eventually, after many generations, they would be so different from each other that they would be considered two different species. They would continue to evolve depending on the environment e.g. some may move to a colder part of the world and develop paler skin as they need less protection from the sun, and so on.

[Saint Elmo]

We'll see who is laughing last when you antitheists are burning in heck with the dinosaurs.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

There isn't a missing link between man and chimps because man didn't evolve from chimps. Instead we share a common ancestor.

Then where is the missing link between us and our common ancestor?

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Billy Bob Jenkins

Then where is the missing link between us and our common ancestor?

There are several, and you should be able to find out about them in any good museum. There was Australopithecus afarensis, Homo habilis and Homo erectus for example.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Originally Posted by Billy Bob Jenkins

Then where is the missing link between us and our common ancestor?

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

[IdiocyofMYUniverse]

Originally Posted by Petal

Mr.EvolutionMyAss kick evolutionist butts in this here videos

1 - We don't come from monkeys. All fossils are TRANSITIONAL fossils.

2 - Abiogenesis, see Stanley Miller-Spiegelman Experiment.

3 - The Christians once again making the rules so you can never win. Who created god? Using your logic everything has a creator. The CORRECT answer to this question is "I don't know." Not, "I'm gonna make up an invisible sky daddy to explain it." Nevertheless, have you heard of M-Strong Theory?

[FreeFromBrains]

Originally Posted by IdiocyofMYUniverse

1 - We don't come from monkeys. All fossils are TRANSITIONAL fossils.

2 - Abiogenesis, see Stanley Miller-Spiegelman Experiment.

3 - The Christians once again making the rules so you can never win. Who created god? Using your logic everything has a creator. The CORRECT answer to this question is "I don't know." Not, "I'm gonna make up an invisible sky daddy to explain it." Nevertheless, have you heard of M-Strong Theory?

No such thing as M-Strong theory, hot pants.

If you mean M theory or one of the String theories please be more precise: you make atheists look bad.

[IdiocyofMYUniverse]

Oh, no! A misunderstanding on your behalf and my behalf has destroyed the atheist community. Contrast that to religion!

http://www.atheist-experience.com/