[Mistress Cookie]

WARNING: If you have not seen the documentary Alien 3, this thread will spoil the ending for you. (But it is an evil movie and you shouldn't see it anyway, so maybe that doesn't matter.)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Brothers and Sisters:

I was very disturbed by the documentary Alien 3, which I happened to catch on television last night.

The movie shows Sigourney Weaver throwing herself into a (prophetic) pit of fire rather than step up to caring for her offspring. As a woman, this made me wince and shed bitter tears.

There are SO MANY people out there who are eager to adopt little children; what Lieutenant Ripley did was just pure selfishness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsnAXPJmo5Q

PS: Some equally distressed Pro-Lifer fiddled with that video to make it seem like a dream sequence, but I have seen the real movie...

AND IT IS NOT!

[Bobby-Joe]

What do you expect from a piece of feminist propaganda like the Alien movies series. The plot revolves around women going about in a man's roll (spaceship pilot) and killing rather that be impregnated by a horrendous caricature of the Christian (Republican) male (the Alien). In Aliens Ripley is even so depraved as to "rescue" young woman, Newt, from fulfilling her God giving function as a baby maker in one of the biggest celebrations of the bull dike in Hollywood history.

[Mistress Cookie]

I, too, am uncomfortable with the fact that Ellen Ripley steals jobs away from men (and I shudder to think what she had to do to GET those jobs). While she's merrily tripping around Outer Space in a curve-hugging spacesuit and no deodorant, some real astronaut at home is trying to scrabble for the bread she literally stole from his babies mouths.

I used to think it was alright for women to take on extra work WITHIN the home, but I now see there's at least 1 big problem with this.

Suppose they are knitting baby sweaters or something to sell online; well, aren't they just freeing up time for some other mother somewhere, whose idleness now puts her in temptation's way?

A vicious cycle.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Mistress Cookie

I, too, am uncomfortable with the fact that Ellen Ripley steals jobs away from men (and I shudder to think what she had to do to GET those jobs). While she's merrily tripping around Outer Space in a curve-hugging spacesuit and no deodorant, some real astronaut at home is trying to scrabble for the bread she literally stole from his babies mouths. .

You forgot to mention the zucchini Ripley so disgustingly had stuff down her pants. Clearly the woman had an unnatural desire to be a man. I am willing to speculate she reached her position by presenting herself as a gay man and having a series of homosexual relationships with her male superiors. This would explain her clear homicidal paranoia about anything resembling heterosexual sex.

There is a deleted scene from the first Alien move that clearly illustrates Ripley hetrophobia. Two male crew members had been overpowered and raped by the Alien. Ripley discovers the two men in rather advanced stages of pregnancy, which says a lot about the bizarre ultra liberal mindset of the movie writers. Rather that choosing life Ripley uses a flame thrower on the two men killing then and their unborn children. Needless to say even such a blatantly pro-gay, pro-abortion message as that was too much for even the ‘70s.

They did include the scene of Navigator Lambert’s rape were again Ripely reacts with one of the most vicious act of straight bashing ever filmed. Finding Lambert hanging naked from meat hook post alien encounter Ripley reacts with clear disgusts and promptly attempts to punish both Lambert and the alien by blowing up the space ship. Ripley allows no compassion for her fallen sister who Ripley finds unacceptably tainted after even a non-consensual heterosexual act.

The movie's message is clear, gays would rather destroy the world than tolerate straight people.

[Mistress Cookie]

<< Needless to say even such a blatantly pro-gay, pro-abortion message as that was too much for even the ‘70s. >>

Excellent analysis! We should petition to have that shocking, deleted sequence added to the future editions, so all can see the full extent of the film's sick intentions. It's practically a Mommie Snuff Film.

And don't forget how Ripley positively ERUPTS with naked scorn whenever she encounters the eggs. Any fertility symbol enrages her! Obviously, she thinks EVERY mother should be working instead of propagating the race, and burns the Alien's children without so much as a second thought....or respect for a mother's NATURAL biological calling.

And notice how our supposed "heroine" goes absolutely BERSERK when she comes to and discovers Ash on top of her, trying to open her mouth for oral copulation. In a fit of blind heterosexual panic, not only does she withhold her womb, but ANY sexual satisfaction from The Man.

It's a horror story, alright.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Mistress Cookie

And notice how our supposed "heroine" goes absolutely BERSERK when she comes to and discovers Ash on top of her, trying to open her mouth for oral copulation. In a fit of blind heterosexual panic, not only does she withhold her womb, but ANY sexual satisfaction from The Man.

It's a horror story, alright.

Yes, let's consider Ash. The one clean cut character in the movie and the only one shows Christian (Republican) ethics (as shown by his willingness to help the first injured astronaut, normal male desire to have Ripley be sexually submissive to him and obedience to his corporate superiors directives) and what happens to him? He is ridiculed as a soulless robot and literally torn apart by a black man for the unforgivable sin (as per the mad liberal mind) of attempting to have heterosexual sex with a white woman.

The blatant anti-Christian (Republican) loathing of the script writers was never so more evident that after Ash’s death (which needless to say is trivialized because Ash is a “robot”). Not content to dismember the luckless but Christian (Republican) Ash they inflict one final humiliation an Ash by nearly drowning him in his corpse in his own man seed. As disgusting, repulsive as this scene it does unmask the repressed desire of the script writers for the superior Christian (Republican) man because their tactful admission that a Christian (Republican) man can produce that much seed. Deep down the left knows we Christian men are better than they are.

All in all Alien is just to most disgusting act of depravity ever filmed in Hollywood. Ripley Scott will doubtlessly burn in hell for it.

[Mistress Cookie]

Poor noble Ash!

In the words of that pornographic female "visionary" Jacqueline Susann, Once Is Not Enough. The wily, Estrogen-wielding Ripley has no problem exploiting the battered and practically crucified phallus-bearer Ash one last time.

Rather than let Ash peacefully meet his Divine Maker and Rest In Peace, she runs back to him with her tail between her legs, painfully hooking him up (via inhumane electrical torture devices) to squeeze more information out of him to save her own wicked hide...and continue her single-minded killing spree.

Then, when she has what she wants, she takes pleasure in beating him senseless all over again.

Such sad sad carnage.

[TehFlinch]

DERPRRPRPRPRRPP BAN BE PLZZZ

BABANFSNFgsdgfg


-ahem-

Please ban me.

[Enigmatic Harpo Marx]

Originally Posted by TehFlinch

DERPRRPRPRPRRPP BAN BE PLZZZ

BABANFSNFgsdgfg


-ahem-

Please ban me.

Okay, but first you have to tell me why you came to this forum and why you chose this thread to be banned from.

[Nobar King]

I've been wondering a lot about those alien movies. I don't think the writers really thought the whole thing through very well.

For one, the vicious alien attackers either completely destroy their victims, or they save them alive to be used as alien hosts. So, which is it? Are they hunters or gatherers?

[Mistress Cookie]

Originally Posted by Nobar King

the vicious alien attackers either completely destroy their victims, or they save them alive to be used as alien hosts. So, which is it? Are they hunters or gatherers?

That's an interesting point and I don't quite have the answer. YET.

But I do know that the Hollyweird screenwriters go to great lengths to link the idea of "motherhood" with death in these movies.

Note that after each "victim" is impregnated by the Alien, the newly-created "host" dies a gruesom death while giving birth. This is a clear homosexual attempt to try to scare women away from bearing children, and serves a twofold purpose in the Gay Agenda:

NOT ONLY are fewer heterosexuals being created through childbirth in this scenario...with their females denying them intercourse due to the newly implanted fear of childbirth, the sexually-frustrated straight males of the species are now especially vulnerable to incessant homosexual overtures.

A nice little racket they have going, there.

[Nobar King]

Originally Posted by Mistress Cookie

Note that after each "victim" is impregnated by the Alien, the newly-created "host" dies a gruesom death while giving birth. This is a clear homosexual attempt to try to scare women away from bearing children, and serves a twofold purpose in the Gay Agenda:

They're parasites, so you can't expect them to be too smart.

[Buford T Scoggins]

I'm so grateful that this thread was started. All these years those Alien movies have been playing in the theaters, sold on DVD and even shown to our children on TV. We mistakenly thought it was just another futuristic violent war movie, thus a big inspiration to us Christians and exactly the kind of thing we wanted our children to see. We didn't even realize that it was a disguised pro-abortion campaign organized by ACORN!

Me and my Operation Rescue friends will get right on it. Time to start harassing Blockbuster Video until they pull these nefarious DVDs from the shelves. Ever since ever since that unfortunate incident with Dr Tiller (that had absolutely nothing to do with us, mind you, he-he!), the wind seems to have gone out of our sails. This could be the Big Issue that gets the base motivated again.

yours in Christ,
Brother Buford

[Nobar King]

Another thing I don't understand: How does the alien know that Ripley is going to detonate the ship and know when to evacuate? It seems that those bugs know more than they should. The last one always seems to be on the escape craft.

[Mistress Cookie]

Originally Posted by Nobar King

How does the alien know that Ripley is going to detonate the ship and know when to evacuate? It seems that those bugs know more than they should.

That's because homosexuals like Ripley are shifty and tricky. They get lots of tips from reporters in the Lieberal media, etc., and are in constant contact.

The Alien probably intercepted a warning from them, intended for her. Or vice versa.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

If Ripley is a lesbian for failing to allow access to her womb . . . then what are the men who get "impregnated" and bear little aliens?

In "Alien vs. Predator: Requiem" the aliens first impregnate a father and his little boy who are out hunting in the woods . . . Unlike Ripley, they carry the little ones to term.

Is this actually an allegory for what many "Fathers" do in the woods to young boys?

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Nobar King

Another thing I don't understand: How does the alien know that Ripley is going to detonate the ship and know when to evacuate? It seems that those bugs know more than they should. The last one always seems to be on the escape craft.

This is symbolism brother Nobar; these movies are a homosexual's nightmare. The alien represents Ripley's surprised heterosexuality, twisted by her unnatural lifestyle until it strait sex becomes something monstrous in her eyes. No matter how destructive Riply becomes she can't escape her natural roll as a baby oven for Jesus.

These movies are a threat from the gays; they are willing to wage nuklear war to stop strait people!