[Trent Harvey, Jr.]

Ever wondered how the liberal media gets those numbers on whoever has died in this or that war? And have you wondered if anyone questions the reliability of these epidemiologists and statisticians and such?

Well, let's look at a current example of two bodycounters: a Medical Journal called The Lancet, and a polling firm called "O.R.B."

For the liberal bias of The Lancet, just remember that these are most likely germunists (supporters of the Germ Theory, and enemies of the Intelligent Healing Theory).

As for ORB, on one hand it has been hired by Margaret Thatcher, but on the other hand it's also been hired by Ronald Reagan, whose Vice-President was George Bush Sr., who opposed the occupation of Iraq. Proof that ORB has an anti-Iraqi-liberation bias.

Which means a lot, since they just published a report on how many Iraqis have died due to the occupation of Iraq.

Here's how The Lancet does its bodycounting:

"The survey was conducted between May 20 and July 10 [2006] by eight Iraqi physicians organized through Mustansiriya University in Baghdad. They visited 1,849 randomly selected households that had an average of seven members each. One person in each household was asked about deaths in the 14 months before the invasion and in the period after. The interviewers asked for death certificates 87 percent of the time; when they did, more than 90 percent of households produced certificates."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101001442.html

So using these methods, what did they find?

"We estimate that between March 18, 2003, and June, 2006, an additional 654,965 (392,979–942,636) Iraqis have died above what would have been expected on the basis of the pre-invasion crude mortality rate as a consequence of the coalition invasion. Of these deaths, we estimate that 601,027 (426,369–793,663) were due to violence."

http://www.thelancet.com/webfiles/im...3606694919.pdf

Now on to ORB, which more recently used similar methods to give us this:

"this data suggests a total of 1,220,580 deaths since the invasion in 2003."

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world...170237,00.html

So, with these obviously unreliable numbers to debunk, how do we get the real ones? It turns out nobody in the US government has been keeping track. Luckily, we have do have a very reliable way of getting the true numbers, right here at our fingertips:

Americans were asked in an AP poll conducted earlier this year how many Iraqi civilians they thought had been killed as a result of the invasion and occupation, and the median answer they gave was 9,890.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world...170237,00.html

Okay, so let's round the real number to 10,000. With the liberal holohoaxers claiming about 1,000,000, that's a thousand-fold exageration.

This allows us to calculate the true number of Jews killed in the Holocaust. The statasticians say it's 6,000,000, which means the true number is actually 60,000.

The same amount of Americans are killed in car accidents every year.

Yet you don't see the hollywood liberals making movies like "Ford's List" or "Mercede's Diary" or whatever.

No doubt these same flawed statistical methods are also used to exagerate the number of people killed by smoking, guns, and other all-American things the Judeo-Socialist culture warriors hate.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Those liberals and their fuzzy math.

Using those calculations, the total amount of buddhists pacified during Buddhist Hunt 2007 would be in the hundreds of thousands. Flattering, but unfortunately nowhere near the truth.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Jeb Thurmond

Those liberals and their fuzzy math.

Using those calculations, the total amount of buddhists pacified during Buddhist Hunt 2007 would be in the hundreds of thousands. Flattering, but unfortunately nowhere near the truth.

Yes, I've been disappointed personally about our South East Asian friend enthusiasm with dealing with problem causers in their society. How can we Christians help those who won't help themselves?

[Open-Minded Philosopher]

The media loves exaggerating things. It's not just the liberal's opinions all the time. Despite we're being run by a government all about making money, there really isn't that much we can trust. All we can do is pray to our Father and his sweet merciful son Jesus to damn those responsible for this lascivious deceit.

Personally, I'm too busy organizing my own life to worry about things that I have no power over (like body counts).

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Open-Minded Philosopher

The media loves exaggerating things.

The media is just plain run by Jews. Even their studio audiences are jewified. Just take a look at this example of persecution, where the Jews pogrom a Christian family right off the set:

[DumbWood]

Originally Posted by Trent Harvey, Jr.

Ever wondered how the liberal media gets those numbers on whoever has died in this or that war? And have you wondered if anyone questions the reliability of these epidemiologists and statisticians and such?

Well, let's look at a current example of two bodycounters: a Medical Journal called The Lancet, and a polling firm called "O.R.B."

For the liberal bias of The Lancet, just remember that these are most likely germunists (supporters of the Germ Theory, and enemies of the Intelligent Healing Theory).

As for ORB, on one hand it has been hired by Margaret Thatcher, but on the other hand it's also been hired by Ronald Reagan, whose Vice-President was George Bush Sr., who opposed the occupation of Iraq. Proof that ORB has an anti-Iraqi-liberation bias.

Which means a lot, since they just published a report on how many Iraqis have died due to the occupation of Iraq.

Here's how The Lancet does its bodycounting:

So using these methods, what did they find?

Now on to ORB, which more recently used similar methods to give us this:

So, with these obviously unreliable numbers to debunk, how do we get the real ones? It turns out nobody in the US government has been keeping track. Luckily, we have do have a very reliable way of getting the true numbers, right here at our fingertips:

Okay, so let's round the real number to 10,000. With the liberal holohoaxers claiming about 1,000,000, that's a thousand-fold exageration.

This allows us to calculate the true number of Jews killed in the Holocaust. The statasticians say it's 6,000,000, which means the true number is actually 60,000.

The same amount of Americans are killed in car accidents every year.

Yet you don't see the hollywood liberals making movies like "Ford's List" or "Mercede's Diary" or whatever.

No doubt these same flawed statistical methods are also used to exagerate the number of people killed by smoking, guns, and other all-American things the Judeo-Socialist culture warriors hate.

Peace Be Upon You.

I cannot believe what I am seeing; you deny the holocaust, and yet are so willing to critcise Ahmadinajad! From what I see here, you would make the best of friends!. I would be interested to know what Mr Jeb Thermond thinks about these claims.

Peace Be Upom You

[Brother Temperance]

Well, this story's a few days old by now, but this week saw shocking scenes in England where baying hoards of Bolshevists/Jews (the two terms are largely interchangeable) descended on Oxford Union in order to prevent the noted historian David Irving from excercising his freedom of speech by opening up a historical debate about the events of the 1930s and 40s. As all decent Christians will agree, attempting to stop a pair of Neo-Nazis from speaking in public is exactly the same as what Hitler did, and worse at the same time.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Originally Posted by dauodwa

I cannot believe what I am seeing; you deny the holocaust, and yet are so willing to critcise Ahmadinajad!

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Even a broken sundial is right once a day.

Peace Be Upom You

And there you have it, you are a filthy Muslim. Jesus didn't come to Earth to foster peace, he came to bring righteousness!