[Levi Jones]

Godless scientists finally get one right.

As we all know, our LORD and Savior Jesus Christ was blue eyed, white and pure.



Now we have proof of what we always knew.

Why blue-eyed boys (and girls) are so brilliant


They claim those with blue eyes are more likely to sparkle academically than those with brown.
They are more intelligent and gain more qualifications because they study more effectively and perform better in exams.
In reaction time trials conducted by U.S. scientists, the brown-eyed performed better, making them more likely to succeed at activities such as football, hockey and rugby.
But the researchers concluded that those with lighter eyes appeared to be better strategic thinkers.
Blue-eyed boys and girls proved to be more successful in activities that required them to plan and structure their time, such as golf, cross-country running - and studying for exams.

I bow down and thank God every day for making me blue eyed and gorgeous, just like Jesus.

[Aristotle]

Originally Posted by Levi Jones

Godless scientists finally get one right.

As we all know, our LORD and Savior Jesus Christ was blue eyed, white and pure.

Now we have proof of what we always knew.



I bow down and thank God every day for making me blue eyed and gorgeous, just like Jesus.

THis is the kind of REAL SCIENCE, the 'liberals' hate. Note that George W. Bush, and Sarah Palin, famous for their great intellectual capabilities, have blue eyes. The Obamas do not. Enough said.

[SayvedByTheLord]

Originally Posted by Aristotle

THis is the kind of REAL SCIENCE, the 'liberals' hate. Note that George W. Bush, and Sarah Palin, famous for their great intellectual capabilities, have blue eyes. The Obamas do not. Enough said.

Indeed they do Brother, and as Project Habakkuk continues forward we will once and for all rub their blasphemous faces in it !

Glory

[James Hutchins]

My piercing blue eyes were the reason I was successful in business.

[Cranky Old Man]

Always good to see more proof that our Savior Jesus Chris was a blue eyed white American. And Project Habakkuk will only increase everyone's awareness of that.

The Holy Bible is also very clear on the subject: Revelation 1:13-16 "And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength."

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

From the same link, I see,

"It is just observed, rather than explained," she said. "There's no scientific answer yet." Dr Tony Fallone, senior psychology lecturer at the University of Bedfordshire, who has also studied eye colour, believes it should be taken more seriously as an indicator of personality and ability.
Most babies have blue eyes but they usually darken as the pigment melanin builds up in the iris.
Less melanin produces green, grey, or light brown eyes. Eyes with very little melanin appear blue or grey.

So, who do we know who have brown eyes and aren’t quite up to it intellectually? And who have a surplus of melanin? I’m sure whoever they are would make OK servants or gardeners.

[Hanahana]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Always good to see more proof that our Savior Jesus Chris was a blue eyed white American. And Project Habakkuk will only increase everyone's awareness of that.

"American?" You made my day!

How could Jesus be an "American" 1776 years before America was created and 1492 years before white people set foot in North America?

[FalseScience]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Always good to see more proof that our Savior Jesus Chris was a blue eyed white American.

That's strange I though America was founded after Jesus' death. How could he be an American? Wasn't he a Jew?

[IonaTucker (Recalcitrant)]

Hi, yeah are you a Nazi?

[María Gálvez-Villalobos]

Originally Posted by IonaTucker

Hi, yeah are you a Nazi?

And you? On Facebook your photo look a little estrange.
The pastors here are no nazis, why are you say that?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by IonaTucker

Hi, yeah are you a Nazi?

Dear Godmocking Whore;

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule of worshiping satan and spreading your legs for anyone with a dollar to post this hateful message. The Holy Bible tells us that we are actually Blessed by your persecution! Thanks for proving that we're right.

Matthew 5:10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
5:12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

Enjoy hell. I know that Jesus and I can't wait to watch you burn in hell for all eternity. Oh, how we'll laugh at you as you scream in agony! Shout Glory!!

YIC,

--Pastor Ezekiel


PS. I am neither a German nor a Catholic Mary-Worshiper.

[Rev. Edward Clement]

Amen Pator Ezekiel!

2 Timothy

3:2 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.

I am never surprised when the demon infested, unsaved trash open their filthy mouths to say persecuting words.

A word of woe unto them! It is safer to play with a knife than to speak against the annointed of the Lord.

The Lord Jesus will rain down his wrath upon YOU for touching the annointed True-Christians™ at Landover Baptist Church!

1 Chronicles
16:21 He suffered no man to do them wrong: yea, he reproved kings for their sakes, 16:22 Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm.

[Beth the Fool]

Having just read this thread, it seems amazing to me that you all claim to have read the Bible. Surely, if you had read it, you would know that Jesus was born in Israel. Being born in Israel would result in Jesus having dark skin as well as dark eyes. He was not born in America, had he been, there would be no mention of Jerusalem or Bethany during the Last Supper. Finally, Jesus was Jewish for the entirety of his life, not a Christian Although we will never know how he really looked will we? No one around at the time had a camera, therefore we have no proof of whether he was dark skinned (which he most probably was) or fair skinned (which he most probably was not). Just saying

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by ninety2

Having just read this thread, it seems amazing to me that you all claim to have read the Bible.

Yes, it is amazing isn't it, you should try it sometime.

Surely, if you had read it, you would know that Jesus was born in Israel. Being born in Israel would result in Jesus having dark skin as well as dark eyes.

Cretin - Jesus' fatherwas God, what does it matter where He was born?

Although we will never know how he really looked will we?

Don't be stupid, of course we know,Jesus appears to lots of people - they all describe him as tall with blond hair and blue eyes

No one around at the time had a camera, therefore we have no proof of whether he was dark skinned (which he most probably was) or fair skinned (which he most probably was not). Just saying

Hands up anyone who is interested in your atheist opinions... (Hmmm... as I thought - you're on your own.)

[Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson]

Originally Posted by ninety2

Having just read this thread, it seems amazing to me that you all claim to have read the Bible.

Oh dear. I'm going to give you a free Bible lesson. Let's start with Matthew 1.

1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
2Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
4And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;
5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
6And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
7And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;
9And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;
10And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;
11And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:
12And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;
13And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
15And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;
16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.


Jesus was a descendant of who? That's right I put it in bold for you so it would be easy for you to understand who I'm talking about. Jesus is a descendant of David.

Now the Bible doesn't tell us what Jesus looked like, but it does tell us what David looked like.

1 Samuel 16:12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.

1 Samuel 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.

Ruddy 1. (of the complexion) having a healthy reddish colour, usually resulting from an outdoor life

Yep, David was fair and red headed just like Jesus. I get so tired of having to explain that Jesus wasn't a darkie.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

"the brown-eyed performed better, making them more likely to succeed at activities such as football, hockey and rugby."

And picking cotton, which unlike the above is actually useful. And pulling wagons, but we have animals for that.

Swarthy people are always so proud that they are "better" at animal skills. "Look at me, I can run fast!" No, horses and cheetas can run fast. And White People can think. You can't do either.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by Godsloveisinfinite

Your point is very strong and relevant.

Because at that time, pro-creation was essential. The world needed to be populated by God's children, homosexual relations would encumber this act.

So why hasn't God, the all-powerful Creator of the entire Universe, seen fit to edit His Bible?

What other Commands of God do you think you should disregard, and why?

Also, as I'm sure you agree, God is perfect in every way, shape and form. Humans are not, I'm sure you will agree. When humans compiled the bible, it is naiive to assume that they compiled it without any influence of their own opinion, for this very reason I believe that homosexuality is condemned in the bible for social/historical reasons. The views of the writers permeated the text.

So explain this to me.

You appear to think the Bible is somehow not what God wants us to read. I'm guessing the parts you think God doesn't want us to read are the parts you personally disagree with, but that's beside the point.

If the Bible is not correct, then one of the following must be the case:

1. God is not all-powerful, and can't fix His Bible.
2. God is not all-knowing, and doesn't care that it's wrong.
3. God knows it is wrong and chooses not to fix it, so that we can all be confused, war amongst ourselves, and end up in His Lake of Fire anyway.
4. God does not exist.

Which of these do you think is the case?

God has so much power, and i believe he would rather rehabilitate those who have done wrong then destroy his creation.

Do you recall the Flood?

God gave Noah ONE HUNDRED YEARS to build a big boat. During that time, He surely could have popped in to visit others and convince them to obey Him, no? But instead of "rehabilitating" them, He chose to drown all humans, including unborn babies and toddlers, and all the animals, because the adult humans refused to obey Him.

So, upon what do you base your belief that He would "rather rehabilitate"?

[Godsloveisinfinite]

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

So why hasn't God, the all-powerful Creator of the entire Universe, seen fit to edit His Bible?

What other Commands of God do you think you should disregard, and why?


So explain this to me.

You appear to think the Bible is somehow not what God wants us to read. I'm guessing the parts you think God doesn't want us to read are the parts you personally disagree with, but that's beside the point.

If the Bible is not correct, then one of the following must be the case:

1. God is not all-powerful, and can't fix His Bible.
2. God is not all-knowing, and doesn't care that it's wrong.
3. God knows it is wrong and chooses not to fix it, so that we can all be confused, war amongst ourselves, and end up in His Lake of Fire anyway.
4. God does not exist.

Which of these do you think is the case?


Do you recall the Flood?

God gave Noah ONE HUNDRED YEARS to build a big boat. During that time, He surely could have popped in to visit others and convince them to obey Him, no? But instead of "rehabilitating" them, He chose to drown all humans, including unborn babies and toddlers, and all the animals, because the adult humans refused to obey Him.

So, upon what do you base your belief that He would "rather rehabilitate"?

I base all my views on God's love. The flood is metaphorical, the Old-Testament God is obviously more violent than the New-Testament god. Yes I disagree with them with the Morality that is given to me by God.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Godsloveisinfinite

I base all my views on God's love. The flood is metaphorical, the Old-Testament God is obviously more violent than the New-Testament god. Yes I disagree with them with the Morality that is given to me by God.

Oh really? So how do you counter the atheist who says everything in the Bible is metaphorical? What makes you so special that you get it right while everyone else is on a continuum of a bit wrong to plain wrong based on arbitrary standards in your own head?

You're just making up your own idea of God and having the arrogance to mock us for believing in Him based on the Bible more than you. How does it feel to be a smug false prophet? How dare you make up your own version of God then question people for having actual faith?

It's super easy to believe in a God that's actually you. So what happens when you decide in your head that there is no God and you can just make up your own morals and cut out the fake middle man? And what's stopping you?

Shame on you!

[Jack O'fagan]

Originally Posted by Godsloveisinfinite

I base all my views on God's love.
The flood is metaphorical, the Old-Testament God is obviously more violent than the New-Testament god. Yes I disagree with them with the Morality that is given to me by God.

Jesus didn't seem to think so,

Matthew 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. 37But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.



Why don't you just rip out the pages you don't like or agree with? The King James leaflet you are left with will give you no confusion and will fit your lifestyle. You might have a bit of explaining to do on the day of judgement though,



YIC


Jack