[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by Red Army

So, in spite of all the real communist bibliography, you think that choosing a religion is a matter of personal weakness. And you are strong, and that is why you do not believe in God.
What about social structures? What about economic determination?


Haven't you passed the first two pages of "Die deutsche Ideologie"? Really?





See? Please, don't be such a troll, and try harder.

Nietzsche is more where I am coming from...

[MitzaLizalor]

.











νους


it's out there somewhere

[Alejandra Larguez]

Originally Posted by PeterKrackpot

Nietzsche is more where I am coming from...

Nietzche was a misogynistic macho, mi amigo. You will need to advance and catch up with current anarchists. Values of the extreme left of the XIX century are now the values of the right wing.


It doesn't surprise me at all coming from right wing Poland, though.

[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by Alejandra Larguez

Nietzche was a misogynistic macho, mi amigo. You will need to advance and catch up with current anarchists. Values of the extreme left of the XIX century are now the values of the right wing.


It doesn't surprise me at all coming from right wing Poland, though.

Nietzsche wasn’t an anarchist. I was quoting his essence about Christianity...

[Alejandra Larguez]

Originally Posted by PeterKrackpot

Nietzsche wasn’t an anarchist. I was quoting his essence about Christianity...

You were quoting a misogynistic and disgusting proto-nazi, and yet calling yourself an anarchist.
While using Nietsche in an argument for an anarchist in the XIX century could be thought of "cool", now you are just making yourself look like a conservative.
Well, you ARE a conservative. Like Fidel Castro, Marx, Bakunin, Evo Morales and most of the left with few exceptions like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.

[Red Army]

Originally Posted by PeterKrackpot

Nietzsche is more where I am coming from...

We used to read Nietsche a lot in the early 40's. Molotov and Ribbentrop were "besties" on those days, so the government gave the people a lot of books to read, and after Trotsky's death my father did not have any desire of keeping the opposition to the regime. So he read us a bit of each book every night
But a few years later they took the books back, told us those books were bad and were burned down.
There is really no content on those books. Just the divagations of a bourgeois, nothing else.
You coming from there explains a lot.

[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by Alejandra Larguez

You were quoting a misogynistic and disgusting proto-nazi, and yet calling yourself an anarchist.
While using Nietsche in an argument for an anarchist in the XIX century could be thought of "cool", now you are just making yourself look like a conservative.
Well, you ARE a conservative. Like Fidel Castro, Marx, Bakunin, Evo Morales and most of the left with few exceptions like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.

Actually, Nietzsche wasn’t a proto-Nazis... the Ubermensche is not a super man that Himmler especially or even Hitler understood. The ubermensche as described by Nietzsche is a person that is a keeper of a new morality that looks past Christianity and it’s weaknesses. It seeks accept the reality of existence based the notion of reality being humanist creation. That all morals and all aspects of life are human in nature. That looking to imaginary beings like god you deny your own agency.

[Alejandra Larguez]

Originally Posted by PeterKrackpot

Actually, Nietzsche wasn’t a proto-Nazis... the Ubermensche is not a super man that Himmler especially or even Hitler understood. The ubermensche as described by Nietzsche is a person that is a keeper of a new morality that looks past Christianity and it’s weaknesses. It seeks accept the reality of existence based the notion of reality being humanist creation. That all morals and all aspects of life are human in nature. That looking to imaginary beings like god you deny your own agency.

"Übermensch", please.


Yet your Wikipedia definition is just as narrow as it could be.
The Übermensch first of all erases women from the reality creation; second this denies your communist inclinations by negating the opposite (reality creates thinking in Marxism, Nietsche opposes that.


There is nothing wrong with not being a Marxist, as marxism is as "macho" as any other men-created ideology. But going from "anarchism" "communism" to "nihilism" is as good a escaping from Turkey to go to Syria. You will be as oppresed as woman, if not even more.


Why do you hate women so much? We have a say in the latino community for people like you. We call you "machirulo". Have a look, google that, and come back.

[Dolores de Barriga]

Originally Posted by PeterKrackpot

Actually, Nietzsche wasn’t a proto-Nazis... the Ubermensche is not a super man that Himmler especially or even Hitler understood. The ubermensche as described by Nietzsche is a person that is a keeper of a new morality that looks past Christianity and it’s weaknesses. It seeks accept the reality of existence based the notion of reality being humanist creation. That all morals and all aspects of life are human in nature. That looking to imaginary beings like god you deny your own agency.

Hello Mr. Krackpot and welcome to this forum! I know that these Baptists here seem rough on the edges, but they can be quite nice if you are nice towards them.

Based on your posts, you seem to have a habit of casually dropping an inflammatory statement, and when someone puts effort to rebuke your thesis, you just ignore that reply and move on to some other inflammatory statement.


I wonder, is this something you practice in every day life, or just restricted to your online behavior?

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Alejandra Larguez

You were quoting a misogynistic and disgusting proto-nazi, and yet calling yourself an anarchist.
While using Nietsche in an argument for an anarchist in the XIX century could be thought of "cool", now you are just making yourself look like a conservative.
Well, you ARE a conservative. Like Fidel Castro, Marx, Bakunin, Evo Morales and most of the left with few exceptions like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.

(You left out) ………Leonid Brezhnev. On the other hand Nikita Khrushchev was addressing Stalinist "party supremacy" which emulated the papal supremacy of other Christ denying realms. He was probably not a conservative but a man in a hat always presents himself as so much more trustworthy.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by Dolores de Barriga

Hello Mr. Krackpot and welcome to this forum! I know that these Baptists here seem rough on the edges, but they can be quite nice if you are nice towards them.

Based on your posts, you seem to have a habit of casually dropping an inflammatory statement, and when someone puts effort to rebuke your thesis, you just ignore that reply and move on to some other inflammatory statement.


I wonder, is this something you practice in every day life, or just restricted to your online behavior?

No...

[Dolores de Barriga]

Originally Posted by PeterCrackhead

No...

Hello again, and if I may, I would like to offer a piece of advice. Coincidentally, this is the same piece of advice I give to my undergrad students when they come crying that they don't want to fail the class.

The advice is: if you put just a little bit of effort in what you write, that effort will be appreciated and you will be taken seriously.

[BibleReader2231]

Originally Posted by PeterCrackhead

No...

Why though? At least Didymus Much can give his opinion. He may be wrong and hateful towards Christians but at least he gives his reasons why. You’re just enjoying being upset at the honest folk here. Quite sad actually, I’ll pray for you tonight before bed and I just know that’ll help you come around to seeing the light.

[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by Dolores de Barriga

Hello again, and if I may, I would like to offer a piece of advice. Coincidentally, this is the same piece of advice I give to my undergrad students when they come crying that they don't want to fail the class.

The advice is: if you put just a little bit of effort in what you write, that effort will be appreciated and you will be taken seriously.

Already have an advanced degree ... no need to waste my time on explaining my positions here.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by PeterCrackhead

Already have an advanced degree ... no need to waste my time on explaining my positions here.

Just how advanced is the degree to which your head is stuck into your rectum? Fortunately, we have a brother here who has medical experience in dealing with cases such as yours.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Just how advanced is the degree to which your head is stuck into your rectum? Fortunately, we have a brother here who has medical experience in dealing with cases such as yours.

I suspect he has an advanced degree of something rather than in something.

[BibleReader2231]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Just how advanced is the degree to which your head is stuck into your rectum? Fortunately, we have a brother here who has medical experience in dealing with cases such as yours.

By any chance are you talking about that Nigra who babbles about Babylon all the time? I heard he’s in medical school but personally wouldn’t trust his expertise. I hope it’s someone faithful like Brother Toole.

[PeterCrackhead]

Originally Posted by BibleReader2231

By any chance are you talking about that Nigra who babbles about Babylon all the time? I heard he’s in medical school but personally wouldn’t trust his expertise. I hope it’s someone faithful like Brother Toole.

Let the BBC change your ways...

[Adam Fag]

Originally Posted by PeterCrackhead

Let the BBC change your ways...

How?

[BibleReader2231]

Originally Posted by PeterCrackhead

Let the BBC change your ways...

I don’t know what a BBC is but I will tell you this. Only Jesus has changed me and he’s all I need to know my “ways”. So with that said, I have no need for BBC.