[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Tamara Whitley

"purple"

If people other than Israelites exist but are bound, how do you account for caged personæ operating Antarctic bases according to their own will, for example the Australian brewery?

1. God shall bless us; and all the ends of the Earth shall fear him.

(Psalms 67:7) This verse tells us that there are people at the far ends of the Earth.

Your next task is to explain which of those people are feared and which are blessed.

2. (Isaiah 45:22)

This is talking about the people outside of Israel.

Cool. That includes Australians. Should "polar Australia" encompass the whole continent? I'm assuming you subscribe to the theory of continents. Is the Southern Ocean an interior sea according to your world view?

Thank you for contributing to the forum. An introductory thread is available here



https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=16

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Tamara Whitley

This verse tells us that there are people at the far ends of the Earth. The Flat Earth theory suggests that this is not possible because we’re caged in by giant uninhabitable walls of ice keeping the water in.

Originally Posted by Mirriam-Webster

Definition of end

1a: the part of an area that lies at the boundary
b(1): a point that marks the extent of something
(2): the point where something ceases to exist world without end

Ends can have walls. There's no contradiction. Anyway, if the various secular flat Earth theories and the Bible don't match up, then we side with the Bible.

This is the Lord telling his people that if they don’t obey God’s law then other nations will come and capture them. Which did of course happen. The nation of Babylon came along which was located in modern day Iraq. So biblically, Iraq is located on the ice wall… If you look at any modern map you’ll find this just isn’t the case.

Wait, the burden of proof is upon you, to prove that Iraq is on the "end of the Earth". Also, the Bible is a letter to US, here, in the present day. More likely it's warning us that we'll be invaded via Deep State NWO bases in Antarctica, where Epstien's island has arrived due to continental drift.

[James Hutchins]

Originally Posted by Amelia Tamara Whitley

Alright, I’ve seen a few posts on the Earth being flat but since you lot refuse to listen to anything other than Bible verses, I decided to make my own argument against you nutters using God’s own Word.

Let us talk about “The Ends of the Earth” verses that get thrown around a lot. Implying the Earth has ends.

Job 28:24 For he looketh to the ends of the Earth, and seeth under the heaven whole.

Flat Earth theory suggests that these ends exist at the “South Pole” However there are some problems with this claim:

Psalms 67:7 God shall bless us; and all the ends of the Earth shall fear him.

This verse tells us that there are people at the far ends of the Earth. The Flat Earth theory suggests that this is not possible because we’re caged in by giant uninhabitable walls of ice keeping the water in.

Isaiah 45:22 Look unto me, and be saved, all the ends of the Earth: for I am God, and there is none else.

This is talking about the people outside of Israel. God desires the whole world to be saved , not just his chosen people, the Israelites.
Here’s even more evidence against you:

Deuteronomy 28:49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far away, from the end of the Earth, as swift as the eagle flieth;a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand.

This is the Lord telling his people that if they don’t obey God’s law then other nations will come and capture them. Which did of course happen. The nation of Babylon came along which was located in modern day Iraq. So biblically, Iraq is located on the ice wall… If you look at any modern map you’ll find this just isn’t the case.


There’s much more but I don’t want to use up all my ammo on the first post. Now come at me boys! Defend your faith!

Hi Amelia!
I was watching the news this morning. They stated that 99% of the earth was in sunlight. If the Earth was a ball, it could never have more than 50% of sun coverage, unless there were two or more suns, which is preposterous.
https://earthsky.org/earth/99-percen...y%2C%20correct.
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/techa...non/ar-AAZlSkr


Even the lying MSM admits the Truth!

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by Tamara Whitley

I decided to make my own argument against you nutters using God’s own Word.

Winning us over with your charm already.

Originally Posted by Tamara Whitley

The Flat Earth theory suggests that this is not possible because we’re caged in by giant uninhabitable walls of ice keeping the water in.

Don't be silly. Even the Eskimos couldn't inhabit an ice wall. It's not like an ice version of Pueblo cliff dwellings. Besides, just because there's a wall doesn't mean there isn't something on the other side.

I believe there are mysterious, unexplored lands beyond the Arctic Wall, explaining why the militaries of the world put forth so much money and effort to deny the average person access to the area. Imagine the good Missionaries can do to reach these far away lands! Imagine growing churches there! Imagine the youth Pastor Zeke can guide to the bosom of Christ!



Admiral Byrd recorded a large land mass (he surmised the size of the United States) beyond the Ice Wall. And before that Samuel Rowbotham debated evolutionists like Alfred Russel Wallace (Charles Darwin's secret gay lover) and published the brilliant work, Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe. This is later scientific discovery the Bible predicted by already exposing the Truth.

On a personal note, you sound angry and you look bitter with your eggplant colored hair. I suspect your father didn't beat you sufficiently and you're a disappointment to your mother. All is not lost. Apologize to Jesus and let Him into your heart. Today is a Great day for Salvation!


Glory!

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by Tamara Whitley

Alright, I’ve seen a few posts on the Earth being flat but since you lot refuse to listen to anything other than Bible verses, I decided to make my own argument against you nutters using God’s own Word.

There’s much more but I don’t want to use up all my ammo on the first post. Now come at me boys! Defend your faith!

You write often "..what this means is..." and babble about "context." We stick with what the Bible says. I recommend you do the same.

A little actual history would not hurt you either. Every year since recorded history, boats/ships/airplanes have disappeared. Amelia Earhart is an example. Searches use scientific instruments and methods. Nothing. There is only one answer. They fell off the edge.

So there you have it. Argument over. Ta ta.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

I don't trust science as far as I can throw it. The only remaining scientific question is why anyone is bothering studying it any more?

[MitzaLizalor]

I was disappointed not to get an answer to my few questions about The Bible and the verses quoted to us in the single post.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

If the Bible says the Earth is flat, then it is flat. The Bible is the Word of God, and God made the Earth, so He should know.

On the left, there are experiments you can do at home. On the right, there are experiments you can try to do and fail:

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Ezekiel Bathfire

God made the Earth, so He should know.

"Number 2-LEFT" was very interesting, in light of what God has explained. But not everything has been covered because not everything is important. We do know that mountains were covered: with water for a short time, a year or so, and in particular the mountains of Ararat Genesis 8:4.

My question relates to Mount Everest. The graphic 2-Left shows exactly what God explained about the mountains, with the mountain top shown in red, hope that's OK, anyway not all mountains are the same height. My question relates to Mount Everest. Was it covered by water too? Nothing lives there apart from a jumping spider that seizes passing insects (by leaping) and I suppose the insects themselves – although they're only there accidentally, having been blown by the wind from wherever they otherwise live. So the water would have to cover Everest by several yards Genesis 7:20 not to miss them.

Sorry about the preamble. When using your experiment to demonstrate water covering mountaintops, would you suggest calling the red bulb the summit of Ararat or of Everest? A simple drain plug and balsa wood boat would show what happened quite well but may leave the impression that that's as high as the water got.

Thank you.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

My question relates to Mount Everest. The graphic 2-Left shows exactly what God explained about the mountains, with the mountain top shown in red, hope that's OK, anyway not all mountains are the same height. My question relates to Mount Everest. Was it covered by water too?

Yes.

Sorry about the preamble. When using your experiment to demonstrate water covering mountaintops, would you suggest calling the red bulb the summit of Ararat or of Everest?

It doesn't matter. The experiment involves a fishtank - you can call the red lump anything you want.

A simple drain plug and balsa wood boat would show what happened quite well but may leave the impression that that's as high as the water got.

A nice touch, but I don't think it matters. The waters covered the face of the earth - all of it, even the bits that Noah was unaware of.

From the atheist NPR - even they admit that the flood was real - a flood that couldn't have happened if the earth were a sphere:

Those limestones at the summit, there are fossils reported from those carbonate rocks, and they're mostly little tiny marine invertebrate animals, little sea shells, essentially. And using high-powered microscopes in thin sections of the rock, we can identify what those animals are.16 Mar 2012

[MitzaLizalor]

Those marine invertebrate animals, deposited by the oceans swirling above Everest, would also have had to die Genesis 6:17 so yes, I can see the waters (fresh water would kill the marine life wherever their oceans had moved them to) would need to cover Everest. I will make some plastic dolphins to go with the little ark and maybe get a small rubber mountain to put in the bottom of the tank.

[James Hutchins]

A little off topic but I'll bring it around.
I was thinking about some wild stories I've heard. Like that the deserts used to be full of water. Being the reasonable man that I am, I listened to these far fetched tales before responding.
If... these deserts were full of water and the Earth round like a ball, where did the water drain off to? It had to go somewhere. It did not just evaporate. The simple explanation is it simply ran off the edge of the firmament into the ether. This is why, even with glacial melting, the oceans do not rise. My old Chris-Craft™ still sites with only 3' of its' hull submerged. Always has.
Every time I hear some cockamamie story of a 'Round 'Earth' and 'global climate' I respond with a 'Show me!' Proofs are easy to make, explanations of facts, simple. Members of LBC are very well educated in the laws of reality and not fooled by side show shannagans.

[WWJDnow]

Of course the deserts were covered with water--it was Noah's flood!

Thanks, Brother Hutchins, for pointing out the simple fact that the waters from the Great Flood would have had no place to go had the world been round.This is so obvious that even a small child can figure it out. So why won't the so-called scientists admit that their round world theory is just that--a theory--and teach the controversy?

[Johny Joe Hold]

I admit to having some eccentric interests. One of them is to drive around Freehold after a hard rain. I've memorized where the spots are that accumulate water. The water is sitting there every time. If the earth were round is would run off and no standing water. No one hears me but I have a laugh at the round earthers.

[WWJDnow]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

No one hears me but I have a laugh at the round earthers.

Don't worry, Mr. Mayor. Jesus hears you, and I'm sure He's laughing, too.