[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Outrageous! According to 8 of the 9 liberal judicial activists on the Supreme Court, when teenage girls "go wild" and lift their shirts in front of people, it's just fun and games. Yet when authorities strip-search a 13-year old girl who had asprin and other hard drugs, suddenly it's "unconstitutional!"

The girl in question had previously been caught in possession of Asprin and Aleve, a painkiller which lasts 12 hours:



12 hours! If that's not a hard drug worth fighting a drug war over, I don't know what is. Obviously the reason she was smuggling painkiller was for dulling to pain caused by nightly anal sex S&M orgies. She also had a razor blade, obviously for shaving her few pubic hairs.

This girl is obviously a hardened criminal, and a harlot who probably got a thrill out of being strip-searched. She probably bragged about her shaving job "down there".

Even her name, "Savana" sounds like a stripper's name. Just the sort of harlot Justice Sotomayor will feel "empathy" for.

So how do the juditial activists rationalize their tyranny?

Activist Justices Stevens and Ginsburg write:

Nothing the Court decides today alters this basic framework. It simply applies T.L.O. to declare unconstitutional a strip search of a 13-year-old honors student that was based on a groundless suspicion that she might be hiding medicine in her underwear. This is, in essence, a case in which clearly established law meets clearly outrageous conduct. I have long believed that " ‘[i]t does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude.’ "

Of course it doesn't require a scholar to judge this case, it requires a True Christian™ pastor. Anyone else is too much of a biased activist.

Ginsburg goes on:

Any reasonable search for the pills would have ended when inspection of Redding’s backpack and jacket pockets yielded nothing. Wilson had no cause to suspect, based on prior experience at the school or clues in this case, that Redding had hidden pills—containing the equivalent of two Advils or one Aleve—in her underwear or body. To make matters worse, Wilson did not release Redding, to return to class or to go home, after the search. Instead, he made her sit on a chair outside his office for over two hours. At no point did he attempt to call her parent. Abuse of authority of that order should not be shielded by official immunity.

Now they're defining sitting in a chair for two hours as a "stress position" or torture? Remember, she was high on painkillers, she couldn't feel a thing for 12 hours!

Justice Souter rationalized his crime against freedom with this nonsense:

Savana’s subjective expectation of privacy against such a search is inherent in her account of it as embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating. The reasonableness of her expectation (required by the Fourth Amendment standard) is indicated by the consistent experiences of other young people similarly searched, whose adolescent vulnerability intensifies the patent intrusiveness of the exposure.

You know what else is "Embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating?" Watching juditial activists spit on the American flag with their freedom-hating judgements! Besides, being 13-years old is ALWAYS "Embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating" so that means that the strip-search had not effect on her.

Only conservative Justice Thomas was willing to stand up for freedom by supporting the right to strip-search asprin-high 13-year old girls:

School districts have valid reasons for punishing the unauthorized possession of prescription drugs on school property as severely as the possession of street drugs

And I'm worried that his judgement had little to do with conservatism and more to do with this tendency as a negro to support stripping underage white girls. I weep for America!

[James Hutchins]

The whore!

Not only should she be strip searched, she should be tied at the four corners for a day and a night in the town square so all might see the horrors of being involved with mommiessatans little helper.

[Nobar King]

I remember when we had this discussion before. The court should have sided with the teacher.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

This is a perfect example of judicial activism at its worst. Unelected liberal activist justices have no business second-guessing the decisions of an assistant principal. This decision is a complete betrayal of America's principles of limited government and the rule of law and will head us down the slippery slope to an all-encompassing nanny state.

[Jacob_Hinds]

What reason did the authorities have to strip a young girl? It is nothing short of perverse that you people support this.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by Jacob_Hinds

What reason did the authorities have to strip a young girl? It is nothing short of perverse that you people support this.

It's called the War on Drugs, and if a few people have to be inconvenienced, so be it.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Jacob_Hinds

What reason did the authorities have to strip a young girl? It is nothing short of perverse that you people support this.

Oh so it is perverse to protect our childern from a drug pushing child predator. When do you think the authorities should step in, after this child starting shooting her follow students in an Advil driven drug rage? Read what Jeb wrote; Advil last for twelve hours. She was menace to every one around her.

[Jacob_Hinds]

Originally Posted by Pastor Isaac Peters

It's called the War on Drugs, and if a few people have to be inconvenienced, so be it.

You do realise the American government, runs the drug trade from South America, carried out by the CIA? As testified by numerous ex-servicemen. Don't be so naive, its pathetic frankly.

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

Oh so it is perverse to protect our childern from a drug pushing child predator. When do you think the authorities should step in, after this child starting shooting her follow students in an Advil driven drug rage? Read what Jeb wrote; Advil last for twelve hours. She was menace to every one around her.

That's not jumping the gun at all! Haha, i couldn't help but smirk reading that, poor you and your little brain.

[Johnnyboy]

Originally Posted by Jacob_Hinds

You do realise the American government, runs the drug trade from South America, carried out by the CIA? As testified by numerous ex-servicemen. Don't be so naive, its pathetic frankly.



That's not jumping the gun at all! Haha, i couldn't help but smirk reading that, poor you and your little brain.

You're very arrogant and condescending for a semi-literate, non typing, Nancy Boy, that has yet to post anything of substance.

[Jacob_Hinds]

Originally Posted by Johnnyboy

You're very arrogant and condescending for a semi-literate, non typing, Nancy Boy, that has yet to post anything of substance.

As usual, you fools resort to unfounded insults. Like children. Idiots of the highest nature.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by Jacob_Hinds

As usual, you fools resort to unfounded insults. Like children. Idiots of the highest nature.

You've already been told in another thread what God thinks of people who call one another fools. Perhaps you should have someone read that post to you.

[Professor Tyeisha X]

If you ask for my opinion, I am completely outraged by the fact that schools are strip-searching 13 year old girls. I'm just as outraged that schools violate civil rights for searching kids for contraband, drugs, or weapons. This reminds me of a case back in Oakland a couple years back. A 15 year old boy and his friends were smoking some marijuana in the bathroom when a school aide walked in. The boy stuffed the marijuana pipe in his pockets. The aide, unconstitutionally searched the boy and found the marijuana which led to his suspension.

Searching people is unconstitutional! The aide had no right to search the boy nor did the school have a right to suspend him. I'm also angry that police officers are able to search "suspects". This is clear violation of the 5th amendment. Not to mention the humiliating full body cavity searches they submit innocent prisoners to when transferring between facilities.

Just goes to show the Constitution is dead in this fascist country!

[Johnnyboy]

Originally Posted by Professor Tyeisha X

If you ask for my opinion, I am completely outraged by the fact that schools are strip-searching 13 year old girls. I'm just as outraged that schools violate civil rights for searching kids for contraband, drugs, or weapons. This reminds me of a case back in Oakland a couple years back. A 15 year old boy and his friends were smoking some marijuana in the bathroom when a school aide walked in. The boy stuffed the marijuana pipe in his pockets. The aide, unconstitutionally searched the boy and found the marijuana which led to his suspension.

Searching people is unconstitutional! The aide had no right to search the boy nor did the school have a right to suspend him. I'm also angry that police officers are able to search "suspects". This is clear violation of the 5th amendment. Not to mention the humiliating full body cavity searches they submit innocent prisoners to when transferring between facilities.

Just goes to show the Constitution is dead in this fascist country!

The only thing that outrages you about the strip searching of 13 yeard old girls, is you ain't the one doing the strip searching.

[Brother Lazarus]

Originally Posted by Professor Tyeisha X

If you ask for my opinion,

Yawn, actually I don't care about your racist, communist, radical, lesbian opinion.

Yours in Christ
Brother Lazarus

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by Professor Tyeisha X

Just goes to show the Constitution is dead in this fascist country!

Not quite, as this decision shows. Still, once Jesus and His favorite party complete their task of shredding the heathenish U.S. Constitution and restoring Biblical law, courts will be able to give this answer to any drugged-up teen harlot who complains about a Constitutional violation:

Ecc. 8:2-4: I [counsel thee] to keep the king's commandment, and [that] in regard of the oath of God. Be not hasty to go out of his sight: stand not in an evil thing; for he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him. Where the word of a king [is, there is] power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou?

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Professor Tyeisha X

If you ask for my opinion, I am completely outraged by the fact that schools are strip-searching 13 year old girls. I'm just as outraged that schools violate civil rights for searching kids for contraband, drugs, or weapons. This reminds me of a case back in Oakland a couple years back. A 15 year old boy and his friends were smoking some marijuana in the bathroom when a school aide walked in. The boy stuffed the marijuana pipe in his pockets. The aide, unconstitutionally searched the boy and found the marijuana which led to his suspension.

Searching people is unconstitutional! The aide had no right to search the boy nor did the school have a right to suspend him. I'm also angry that police officers are able to search "suspects". This is clear violation of the 5th amendment. Not to mention the humiliating full body cavity searches they submit innocent prisoners to when transferring between facilities.

Just goes to show the Constitution is dead in this fascist country!

Harlot! People like you would just have us line up on some hill top so Al Quida can cut our throats one at a time.

The police in that Oakland case had every reason to strip search that young boy and insert a fiber optic cable into his rectum. They smelled smoke, the kid shoved something into his pants and the kid had a Muslim sounding last name. It was logical to assume the kid of was terrorist hiding a IED.

Yes, some people will be humiliated, traumatized and someone times killed but that iswhat we have to do to keep people safe.

Anyway after the physical therapy the kid functions fine so why the crying about the head blow? You liberals are just a bunch of carebears.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Professor Tyeisha X

Just goes to show the Constitution is dead in this fascist country!

You shut your filthy hole you jumped up pickanninnie! America is God's favorite country, and there are Christian men sending islamofascists to hell over in Iraquistan RIGHT NOW just to defend your right to be strip searched!

[Father Thomas Martin]

So "only Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas voted in dissent"?

Then how do you explain Conservative Justices Roberts, Alito, and Scalia voting that the strip-search is illegal then?

(and BTW, you're trapped in a logical puzzle, because the Justice you're supporting is a practicing Catholic)

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by Father Thomas Martin

(and BTW, you're trapped in a logical puzzle, because the Justice you're supporting is a practicing Catholic)

We've been though this before. Catholics, like Mormons and members of other religions that are socially conservative but not True Christian™, are politically useful in this life, even though they are damned in the next.

Anyway, did you read this thread to get fresh ideas for St. Pædophilus Parish School?