[Elmer G. White]

Modern atheist science is at crossroads. They have not gained any significant new discoveries since the finding of fossils, creatures buried by Noah's Flood, in the 18th century. Especially, physics has become a fool's errand. By attempting to explain the Creation with Big Bangings, Inflation (why the economics mixed up with physicalism?), more and more unanswered questions have emerged. Now even the physicians themselves admit the impossibility of this endeavor but still fail to reach an understanding of the Truth™. A recent scientific publication in a Commie Newspaper reveals all this, as follows:

...the laws of physics will never explain the universe
It once seemed that, for all its immensity, the cosmos could be understood through the application of a small number of rigid physical laws... Yet this is a logical fallacy. Even if we imagine that humanity will ultimately discover a “theory of everything” covering all individual particles and forces, that theory’s explanatory value for the universe as a whole is likely to be marginal...

Finally, an honest astrologer admitting that they have absolutely no means to explain anything at all, that all their attempts are doomed to humiliating failure. As their last attempt, the physicians recently turned to "stimulations" with super computers in order to try to copy God's Handywork.

Our simulations necessarily rely on extrapolations, compromises and all-out speculations developed by experts. The uncertain parts cover not just stars, but black holes, magnetic fields, cosmic rays and the still-to-be-understood “dark matter” and “dark energy” that seemingly govern the overall structure of the universe.
This will never result in a literal digital replica of the universe that we inhabit. Such a recreation is just as impossible as a precise forecast for the future of the solar system.

The atheist astrologers still need to take an additional step. While they cannot explain the universe at all, there is a community of True Christians™ that can easily explain everything. The explanation has been widely available for millennia, it is the KJV Bible, first available as the perfect American form only in the mind of Jesus Christ during the era, when the savage brutals still had to rely on the imperfect languages of Ancient Grease and Jewdea to communicate, until the time was ripe for the perfect American idiom. It tells us the shape, origin and fate of the Universe!



Not only does the Genesis 1 tell us about the shape of things, the above-depicted model is also confirmed in later chapters. Glory!

Genesis 8:2
The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;

One question remains. The astrologers used to hypothesize that "galaxies" were distant objects containing many dozens, even hundreds of additional stars. Now they have also realized the futility of this claim. Glory!

Ultimately, galaxies are less like machines, and more like animals – loosely understandable, rewarding to study, but only partially predictable. Accepting this requires a shift in perspective, but it makes our vision of the universe all the richer.

Galaxies are just animals inhabiting the Heaven on the other side of the Waters Above. I suspect that many of them are horses and carrion fowl ready to fight and consume sinners very soon when Jesus returns in gory glory!

Revelation 19:21
And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Here is a galaxy that looks like a horse:



And this one looks like a fowl:



How could the uneducated, barely literate scribes of Bibical times have known this is God had not told them about these animals long before the discovery of the tellyscope? Obviously, it would have been impossible. Now the physicalists also know this and mass conversions are to be expected.




Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[MitzaLizalor]

One point that always strikes me is, do they even know which universe they're trying to describe?

Originally Posted by Elmer G. White

Their problem seems to be that those "laws" are the result of observing and describing how things interact. No observations are possible beyond the observable universe and they don't know what proportion of the whole that is. 1%, 95%, or ³⁄₁₄₁₅₉₂₆₅₃₅₈₉₇₉₃₂₃₈₄₆₂₆%?

Originally Posted by Massachusetts Institute of Technology

an intermediary phase of the early universe [may] have bridged cosmic inflation with the Big Bang. This phase, known as “reheating,” occurred at the end of cosmic inflation and involved processes that wrestled inflation’s cold, uniform matter into the ultrahot, complex soup that was in place at the start of the Big Bang. “The postinflation reheating period sets up the conditions for the Big Bang, and in some sense puts the ‘bang’ in the Big Bang,” says David Kaiser, the Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science and professor of physics at MIT. “It’s this bridge period where all hell breaks loose and matter behaves in anything but a simple way.”

“The earliest phases of reheating should be marked by resonances. One form of high-energy matter dominates, and it’s shaking back and forth in sync with itself across large expanses of space, leading to explosive production of new particles . . . once it starts transferring energy to a second form of matter, its own swings will get more choppy and uneven across space. We wanted to measure how long it would take for that resonant effect to break up, and for the produced particles to scatter off each other and come to some sort of thermal equilibrium, reminiscent of Big Bang conditions.”

For various reasons, the expansion called "big bang" may not have progressed smoothly, they argue. Reheating events would be almost certain under prevailing conditions during the first ¹⁄₁₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀₀ second. The problem for them is the size of the whole shebang, which would be very small. The resonances would be like sound evoking resonance in a window pane (which is fairly thin) or perhaps like inside a wobbling dessert. The reason why, they proclaim, is because when the universe is smaller than the smallest particles, i.e. smaller than one such particle, no particles can exist; therefore they present as radiation and will not transmogrify into particles until the available space is big enough to accommodate them. That would provide the impetus for "inflation" since the pressure would be extreme even though it arose from radiation (e.g. radio waves) rather than particles (e.g.air) and the radiation would have frequencies (like car radios or saxophones) that could resonate with one another, either harmoniously or not, generating epochs of stability or instability as may be seen in any wobbling dessert.

Back to Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The team’s computer simulations represent a large lattice onto which they mapped multiple forms of matter and tracked how their energy and distribution changed in space and over time as the scientists varied certain conditions . . .“Reheating was an insane time, when everything went haywire,” Kaiser says. “We show that matter was interacting so strongly at that time that it could relax correspondingly quickly as well, beautifully setting the stage for the Big Bang. We didn’t know that to be the case, but that’s what’s emerging from these simulations, all with known physics. That’s what’s exciting for us.”

For matter to exist, inflation must have expanded the available space sufficiently for at least some particles to be there. Unstable resonance would mean varying conditions within the whole: its oscillations would no more be uniform than those in the wobbling dessert: expansion and contraction do not occur at the same time or by the same amount at all locations, as may be seen in the illustration. Therefore, it follows, reheating events would be local as the resonances caused contraction sufficient for any matter to revert to radiation. The resultant big bang would apply to that region only and the ensuing universe, of which only a portion can be observed, would expand in the dimensions we inhabit, since we are sub-entities of that universe. Other regions within the inflationary/reheating/big-banging glob would generate their own dimensions.

So the point that always strikes me is, since other regions big-bang according to their own time frame and are not simply farther away locations than we can see, rather are a distinct and separate lattice of their own, do Physicians even know which universe they're trying to describe? Until that is determined, how would they know if Physics has explained anything anyway?

Luke 12:56-57 Ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky and of the earth; but how is it that ye do not discern this time? Yea, and why even of yourselves judge ye not what is right?

They just don't get it, as your photography shows, especially when their aha! moments contradict establish facts. Mass conversion in the foreseeable future is extremely unlikely.


• https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/24/the-big-idea-why-the-laws-of-physics-will-never-explain-the-universe
• https://news.mit.edu/2019/putting-bang-in-big-bang-1025

[Dennis Lukes]

O praise, o glory! If it wasn't summer vacation, I'd head on right down to the nearest university department of physics to spread the good news. Science leaves a void in the soul, but Jesus can fill that hole. Physics were invented by the Jew Albert Einstein to undermine the Bible and subvert western civilization. His formula e=mc^2 is a numerological sigil from the kabbalah used to invoke demons. I'm glad to see the preachers of his Talmudic doctrines repenting of their blasphemy.

[Isabella White]

I have no doubt that scientists are completely clueless when it comes to explaining the universe. They dismiss the and, in so doing, they have completely missed the explanation of when He created the universe:

Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."

Genesis 15, 16, 17:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

Now, normally I wouldn't listen to anything from that Mormon-ish false prophet, Glenn Beck, but he does have a point here, and he seems to know a bit more than the so-called "brilliant" scientists who pretend that they understand the universe.

“It is hot. Yes, it is. And you know what causes that? There is this thing — if you go outside right now, depending on where you are, what time zone — but you go outside and you look up, and you will see the sky is on fire in one particular spot. Why is space, which is closer to the sun than us, so cold, right? They can’t answer that. Anyway, wealthy climate crusaders love to hop from one climate change doomsday conference to another on their private jets, and then they try to tell us how we need to live our life and not travel.”

https://www.joemygod.com/2023/07/gle...un-is-on-fire/

[MitzaLizalor]

As you know, I'm always ready to acknowledge achievements where they appear, regardless of who made the breakthrough. Who knows? It could be the first step on a path to reality from mindless indoctrination – and let's face it, getting rid of the mind is foundational in any system of indoctrination. "Brainwashing" some people call it. But I consider that something that happens later, after a mind of sorts has developed and needs to be excised, like a wart. Godless education begins at the cradle with all sorts of crackpot ideas recited over and over again, hopefully with no alternatives ever encountered. That's why these "two income" households have sprung up, simply to necessitate "day care" for all ages where secularist dogma can be drilled in.

There is nothing revealed by God relating to diesel v. unleaded v. propane, because He loves us and wanted us to have the joy of discovery for ourselves; whether He knew we'd go the whole hog and do plutonium as well is peripheral here since so far there are no plutonium vehicles available; clockwork is another unexplored power source but even so, God has not weighed in on the plutonium v. clockwork debate either. I suppose there could be plutonium springs to wind up one day but the point is that science can teach us so much in addition to what God has already explained, as Nebuchadnezzar well knew.

Daniel 1:3,4a,6 And [Nebuchadnezzar] spake unto Ashpenaz the master of his eunuchs, that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes; children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science . . . among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah

God blessed their studies and they prospered. At no stage did they "discover" God was mad and propounding garbage as though it were sound. Indeed, when King Nebuchadnezzar enunciated his new idea that everyone had to grovel¹ before a revolting idol, a concept reflected in heresies today, it was he, not they, who went mad² — upon pain of death they stuck with what God had explained and were fireproof³ (in Daniel's case lionproof⁴ too) — how unlike the science of today⁵ where God is sought to be replaced and His information about the universe swamped with so much new stuff that most learner groups would never hear of it at all.


1. Daniel 3:11
2. Daniel 4:33
3. Daniel 3:17
4. Daniel 6:21-22
5. I Timothy 6:20

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Science is having a bad week. In addition to Brother Elmer's rigorous take down of cosmeticological physics, the President, Chief Executive and Professor of Stanford Marc Trevor Tessier-Lavigne OC FRS FRSC FMedSci has been forced to resign after his science was exposed as fraudulent. We at LBC of course are not suprized to see the global scientological conspiracy unwinding.

An investigation into the so-called "Dr." (I would like to see his long-form PhD certificate) found he had fostered an environment that led to “unusual frequency of manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices” across labs at multiple institutions.

The Stanford investigation did not find that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne personally altered data or pasted pieces of experimental images together. Instead, it found that he had presided over a lab culture that “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”

Despicable. Winners like Marc Trevor Tessier-Lavigne who have the ability to "generate favorable results" only prove that all science is based on fraud. Nothing like this would happen in properly run institutions with Senior Executives and high standards, not Stanford-level trash.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by Elmer G. White

And this one looks like a fowl:



How could the uneducated, barely literate scribes of Bibical times have known this is God had not told them about these animals long before the discovery of the tellyscope? Obviously, it would have been impossible. Now the physicalists also know this and mass conversions are to be expected.




Yours in Christ,

Elmer

I'm sure you noticed, but that heavenly fowl sure looks like a Freedom Bird:

[its_faith]

A lot of things are just best left unexplained and attributed to Gods will.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by its_faith

A lot of things are just best left unexplained and attributed to Gods will.

This is really the only place left on the Internet where serious debate about the connection between science and religion still happens. All it will take is for scientists to study which is the best religion, pick a side and then we can duke it out with the Muslims once and for all. It's infuriating they take so long to decide - what are they doing in there???

I'll be the first to admit there are things we can learn from science. The concept of survival of the fittest, for example, works marvelously to drive market efficiency. Nature does not care about the human cost; nature produces 100 BILLION sperm in every [LADIES, LOOK AWAY] ejaculation. It does not care that 999 million sperms must die - fall apart, disintegrate, dissolve twitching in a puddle of... humiliation, or simply be wiped away in a dirty sock - to produce a single 1-in-a-billion lucky winner. We are the lucky ones who will go to Heaven, the rest can go to Hell. That's the kind of place of understanding where science and religion should come together.