[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Have the MSM headlines foreshadowed the "pope", or has he become irrelevant?

Certainly Jesus has been busy lately settling some scores with sinners in Florida, and the Ukraine "crisis" has stolen some headlines. Indeed, Greta Thunberg risks having her tush frozen this winter for lack of Russian fossil fuels through the Nordstream I pipe line.

Then Bergoglio tried to meet with Xi Jinping and was rebuffed - thanks to Bergoglio the commie Chinese already have a "new" pope, his name is Pope Xi.

Thanks to the Ukrainian "war" there are looming food and grain shortages, and rumors are that Bergoglio is meeting with the WEF / New World Order types like Bill Gates to introduce "crunchy" wafers made from insects.

The sin-odd Synods are continuing at a record pace, and now the LGBT crowd is having their own revolts as the homers and lezbeans are upset with the "trans" as not having bonafide tallywhackers and cooters - and I might add as God had intended.

And finally, all the "traditional" cathylicks seem to only be complaining about is that they want their "Latin Mass" back - along with their traditional bead slinging and Mary worshiping.

If there is any hope here, it's that Bergoglio is missing his opportunity to become the Amazon Prime Purveyor of the one world religion.

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Francis’s Unholy Occupation of the Papacy, Fatima, and the Pressing Need for Holiness

Written by Robert Morrison - Remnant Columnist


October 4, 2022 will mark the third anniversary of Francis’s introduction of the Pachamama idol at the Vatican. During the past three years, Francis has caused numerous other grave scandals, each of which would have been considered unthinkable prior to Vatican II:


- He has convoked the Synod on Synodality, which by its structure and objectives seeks to undermine the immutable nature of the Catholic Faith and set aside Christian morality;

- He travelled to Canada to apologize for evils the Church did not commit and be present for a ceremony described by Archbishop Vigano as “the satanic rites of evocation of the dead performed by a shaman”;

- He has increased his attacks on Traditional Catholics with his Traditiones Custodes and accompanying measures;

- He participated in the “Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions” in Kazakhstan, where he endorsed false religions and false gods;

- He issued his apostolic letter Desiderio Desideravi, which suggests that the Church should permit everyone to receive communion; and

- He has repeatedly put himself, and the apparent authority of the Catholic Church, at the service of the anti-Catholic globalists and the Great Reset.

We could add many more scandals to this list. Truly, Francis appears to thrive on doing all he can to destroy the Church, so a week does not pass without him publicly inflicting harm on the Mystical Body of Christ.

. . . .

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/ind...d-for-holiness

[Dennis Lukes]

Still waiting for the traditionalists to declare him Antipope and reinstate old Benny. The reign of the first non-Catholic pope has certainly been good for the rest of us, hastening the destruction of the Whore of Babylon. Good riddance to the Fag Church when it finally goes down. Catholicism is Satan's proudest achievement since the Fall.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Christianity does not need a wimpy Pope. In fact, it does not need a Pope or the Catholic cult at all. What Christianity needs is many more churches like the Landover Baptist Church.

[MitzaLizalor]

I remember laughing quietly when this unenlightened old fool was elected. The betting was strong on either an Italian or a South American getting the job, each having similar $&¢ odds. Frank is both: an Italian born in Argentina. One would think very few prospects existed for such a person and one would be right.

Now I know I'm thought of as half way to being a communist because of a willingness to see the other side of any question but that's OK – I'm not a commie, even if I've lived in places where it's generally thought impossible to be a Christian without being a socialist. I'm not sure which was supposed to come first. So in Frank's case, since in order to be pope I'd imagine some education is required, I try to understand what it feels like for him when he starts telling lies. Essentially that's whenever he's speaking so the task is easier in that respect: no need to weed out the genuine statements: there aren't any.

Well, so far so good. All we need to do is to imagine what it's like for him to be awake.

Nothing. Presumably he can read and must have read [at least some of] The Bible, even if it's in Latin, because don't they quote it at their masses? Therefore he knows what he teaches is the polar opposite of anything found in Scripture and certainly knows he's lying. The last I heard he wants to retire. Then there'd be FIVE popes.

1. Ratzinger
2. Bergoglio
3. the Coptic pope
4. the sedevacantist alternative pope
5. whoever gets elected to replace #2

They say if you go to see a pope you have to wear some ghoulish black outfit. It would almost be worth getting an invitation just to turn up in fluorescent hot-pants and an LED polka dot kimono.

I've stopped thinking about popes now. Their state of mind is as utterly incomprehensible to me as it must be for them.

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Then there'd be FIVE popes.

1. Ratzinger
2. Bergoglio
3. the Coptic pope
4. the sedevacantist alternative pope
5. whoever gets elected to replace #2

Miss Lizalor, I'm surprised you didn't count Padre Arturo Sosa Abascal, the Superior General of the Jesuits which many Protestants label as "The Black Pope".


Also, there is also a seventh Pope: Papa Emeritus VI, who is the Satanist Pope that sings in a Swedish metal band.

[MitzaLizalor]

Oh! Is he on his 7th life already? But otherwise, I was referring to popes regarded as such by catholics. Assorted catholics but it's a big umbrella of denominations. Should I include the orthodox patriarchs? It's claimed often enough that the "Roman" splinter group is nothing more than Italian Orthodox.

In that case I suppose popes ought to be styled "Patriarch of Rome" and if we're including so-called church leaders not acknowledged by catholicism itself, but who consider themselves part of the apostolic succession, there could be quite a long list.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Romeo Rovagnati

Miss Lizalor, I'm surprised you didn't count Padre Arturo Sosa Abascal, the Superior General of the Jesuits which many Protestants label as "The Black Pope".

Wait - isn't Francis the Black Pope - because he is not just a Jesuit but also the highest-ranking Jesuit in the Catholic Church?

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

I have lived in Godless Britain for so long now that I am at a loss to understand all this Pope business. Whatever one may say about King Henry VIII (I won't elucidate, because much if not quite all of it is a matter of public record), at least he did away with "elected" heads of the church, making it a hereditary matter. Okay, there have been occasional glitches, but on the whole I think this is something that we at Landover Baptist Church can get behind, what with our thoroughly excellent experience of the Flint family!

The Church of England or course still suffers the scourge of Bishops and Archbishops, who seem to elect/appoint each other. This dubious behavior makes no pretense at being democratic. But at least it's not anonymous, no smoke is involved, and the monarch retains supreme power to hire and fire. And only blood-soaked revolution can displace the monarch. It will be interesting to see if the new king provokes such action.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

Wait - isn't Francis the Black Pope - because he is not just a Jesuit but also the highest-ranking Jesuit in the Catholic Church?

Does the black pope have to be a Jesuit? What's an antipope? An Augustinian? I didn't know it was so regimented.

Anyway, in the spirit of Bergoglian œcumenism, maybe it's time for a Buddhist pope bringing new-age crystal dogma into the fold (as well as actual Buddhists and Romists) for an air of respectability. Beelzebub could use that to deceive more Christians than he has already i.e. the ones who zone out as soon as they hear "energies" or "chakra workshop" because those ideas are too alien. But if there's a pope on the team, they start to look more mainstream. Would that be an antipope?

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

.... Would that be an antipope?

Wait... I thought the pope/antipope thing was that if you brought the two of them together, they'd self-annihilate in a puff of logic?

[MitzaLizalor]

Very difficult to assess. Doesn't Beelzglio consider himself to "be" poverty? For instance he didn't live in whatever palace was provided in Buenos Aries but had a small residence somewhere. Same now, he uses a few rooms (something like a hotel suite, one of several provided for visitors) but the palaces, castles, and however many mansions exist for bishops etc. are still there. So his joint in Buenos Aries was IN ADDITION to the palace or palaces – not instead of. That would make him LESS poverty stricken according to any logic I'm familiar with.

Let's say the real estate in Argentina was worth a trillion. Nice central locations, grotesquely ornate, marble, gold, one in each major city plus the blasphemous temples masquerading as "churches" more gold, marble, granite, onyx, diamond encrusted decorations, even a simple ring or necklace is worth over a million ($) OK so that's without the ADDITIONAL small dwelling. I looked up some prices:

€3,803,900
€3,003,100
€1,501,500
€1,001,000
$150,417

You can guess which one is not in the vicinity of Beelzglio's (former) workplace and I'm assuming he walked to work or rode a bicycle rather than was chauffeured half way across the city. But leaving all those on the slate, we get an average price of $1,854,745. So Mister Poverty, instead of swanning around in a trillion dollars worth of excessive luxury (and I know when questioned they say they don't actually own any of that but I don't believe them) was actually sitting in or on $1,000,001,854,745 (that he didn't own and didn't actually use) and it's still there. Now of course he gets that multiplied by however many such establishments there are across the whole world. But doesn't use them. Yeah.

So what happens when that variety of logic is applied to popes and antipopes I have no idea – but a wormhole would be nice.