[Johny Joe Hold]

Going through the courts now is a very practical bill. It is to allow those of us who own guns to remove serial numbers. We will be able to buy guns more easily--the seller will not need to worry about getting bitten by some silly lawsuit later on because a gun can be traced back to him.

To defend our country against foreign invaders, or domestic liberal threats to our freedoms, a lot of guns will be needed. We don't have nearly enough of them yet. Stopping Big Brother from snooping around and recording information about who has guns and where they came from is a good first step.

Following Justice Clarence Thomas's lead, judge finds right to remove guns’ serial numbers. (slate.com)

[James Hutchins]

I've always felt that once you buy something, it is your inalienable right to do anything you want with it. Serial number, warning labels, fingerprints or even personal records.
If I can trim my hair, I can modify my weapon. God would not of given us files, scissors or sandpaper otherwise.
When a wetback or darkie is brought to the Hutchins Plantation, LLC, I do not harass them for proof of life. I do not expect tot harassed for proof of death either. It is what it is.
I do not need to see the serial number on a 1911 to chamber a round and squeeze seven off. If God wanted things to be permanent, he'd of made it that way.

[its_faith]

Ive been busy all day doing this. Gonna take me months.

[Dennis Lukes]

It's one small step from engraving serial numbers on our guns to tattooing serial numbers on our arms. Those numbers are exclusively used by law enforcement. What are they trying to say, that legal gun owners are criminals? I'm surprised the liberals aren't lobbying for a national database of gun owners, like the sex offender registry. That's how they treat us. I love shooting my guns at the range or in the woods or even just sitting in my gun room admiring my guns, stroking them gently and murmuring, and thinking "This must be how God feels." Our sacred Right to Keep and Bear Arms isn't just a privilege, it's a commandment from Jesus. We MUST be armed, it's our religion (Luke 22:36). Every time there's some other stupid mass shooting on the news, I pray to Jesus this won't be the time the Democrats come to take my guns away from me. I'll never let that happen, I don't care how many kids get shot.

If you get in legal trouble for filing those ugly numbers off your beautiful gun, take the stand amd plead the 2nd.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes

It's one small step from engraving serial numbers on our guns to tattooing serial numbers on our arms.

We might as well be living in a Nazi concentration camp for all the regulations on guns. Actually it would be better in a concentration camp - at least there would be armed guards in case a bad guy with a gun shows up and slaughters all the Jews.

Every time there's some other stupid mass shooting on the news, I pray to Jesus this won't be the time the Democrats come to take my guns away from me. I'll never let that happen, I don't care how many kids get shot.

I too do not care how many children are killed. Where's MY bumper sticker? Why aren't we allowed to say our opinions publicly? The first amendment protects the right to shoot as an expression of free speech - no exceptions else it's a slippery slope of the type Pastor Pistle would dispatch with a bayonet.

The government also cannot compel speech, i.e. serial numbers on weapons. It's egregiously wrong. Without the second Amendment there wouldn't even be a first Amendment - they would have had to start at 3. Not in this America, Joe Biden. We have a 1 and 2 in our Amendments not on our guns.

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

The government also cannot compel speech, i.e. serial numbers on weapons. It's egregiously wrong. Without the second Amendment there wouldn't even be a first Amendment - they would have had to start at 3. Not in this America, Joe Biden. We have a 1 and 2 in our Amendments not on our guns.

It's only a matter of time until Sleepy Joe comes for our beloved 3rd Amendment. What better way to teach the humble, pious residents of red states "tolerance" than by forcibly quartering LGBT and/or Negro/Hispanic/Muslim soldiers in our homes? He'll do it. I wouldn't put anything past his puppetmasters (Revelation 2:9).

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes

It's only a matter of time until Sleepy Joe comes for our beloved 3rd Amendment. What better way to teach the humble, pious residents of red states "tolerance" than by forcibly quartering LGBT and/or Negro/Hispanic/Muslim soldiers in our homes? He'll do it. I wouldn't put anything past his puppetmasters (Revelation 2:9).

Not many people know there's a 3rd Amendment. The big ones are the 1st, 2nd and 5th but there is one hiding in between called the 3rd. You can look it up.

They even repealed an amendment once. (As an analogy, think of it like re-electing Boris Johnson). So don't think they won't repeal any more of your precious rights. They also had the nerve to call it an amendment which is sick joke (think of BoJo again).

[Johny Joe Hold]

If someone you did not know called and said, "I'd like to know your social security number," you would tell that person to go fly a kite or hang up. The same thing is true about the serial numbers on your self-defense weapons. No one else should have access to them.

The safest thing to do is file them off and leave no trace.

[Johny Joe Hold]

We who know guns are the only defense against deep state socialism can be happy about a District Court decision to let men facing charges of domestic violence defend our country. The decision was that people, usually men, who have a record of domestic violence, can keep their guns. That was one I was worried about.

Reality is many of our best defenders of Make America Great Again have had little "run ins" with wives or girl friends. Sometimes women just make him angry, he does something to discipline his woman and police get involved.

These men need their weapons for the big battle yet to come. This is when we must pull out our weapons and defend freedom. We cannot afford to have men who otherwise are ready to fight be empty handed.

5th Circuit Court rules that those accused of domestic violence can keep their guns. (slate.com)

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

Reality is many of our best defenders of Make America Great Again have had little "run ins" with wives or girl friends. Sometimes women just make him angry, he does something to discipline his woman and police get involved.

These men need their weapons for the big battle yet to come. This is when we must pull out our weapons and defend freedom. We cannot afford to have men who otherwise are ready to fight be empty handed.

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It makes sense that you'd want men with experience when it comes to taking down the libs. According to statistics, a large percentage men in wars do not actually shoot at the men on the other side.

https://www.americanheritage.com/sec...ho-didnt-shoot

In any given body of American infantry in combat, no more than one-fifth, and generally as few as 15 percent, had ever fired their weapons at an enemy, indeed ever fired their weapons at all.

They will shoot over their heads of the enemy or not shoot at all. According to some accounts, they see them as working class men like themselves who have ended up in a terrible situation based on no decision of their own, ditto for the poor sod on the other side. Those failed men won't cut it at all - we need proven killers. At least domestic violence shows the right attitude - we can work with that.

[Dennis Lukes]

The federal government does not legally classify muskets as firearms for some reason, so anyone can own them even if they're on some kind of watch list. So long as it was manufactured prior to 1898 and is flintlock, caplock, or matchlock, the gummit says it's not a gun, though I'm not sure a home invader would believe that while he's bleeding out on your rug from the golf ball-sized hole you blew through his chest with your Kentucky rifle. I own a blunderbuss which can be filled with grape shot or other nifty ammunition like nails and broken glass. Fix bayonet for added fun. So what if three-cornered blades were prohibited by the Geneva Convention? That didn't apply in 1776. Sure, a smooth bore flintlock pistol only holds one shot and is inaccurate as hell, but that's why they invented the bandolier, so you can carry six of them at a time (not counting hip or ankle holsters of course) and once you've fired all your guns you can use them quite effectively as clubs, that's old-fashioned craftsmanship right there. Of course these weapons tend to kick up a lot of smoke, but you can use that to your advantage, just charge them with your cavalry saber while they're stumbling around blind. If youre looking for concealment, derringer pistols can fit in your pocket ajd thats all John Wilkes Booth needed to kill Lincoln. That's right, according to current government regulations the gun used to assassinate the President of the United States is not legally considered a firearm. Imagine how differently things would have gone on 1/6 if the patriots had all been armed with muskets and flintlock pistols instead of their bare fists. God bless America.

[WWJDnow]

These men aren't going to use the guns on their wives and girlfriends, tempting though it might be. The guns are to keep black people out of white neighborhoods. That threat doesn't disappear simply because some Jezebel refuses to obey her husband.