[Titus Templeton]

The Christian Nation, Race and God

THERE are some truths which are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen or at
least not recognized by ordinary people. They sometimes pass by such truisms as though blind
and are most astonished when someone suddenly discovers what everyone really ought to
know. Columbus's eggs lie around by the hundreds of thousands, but Columbuses are met with
less frequently.

Thus men without exception wander about in God's garden of Nature; they imagine that they know
practically everything and yet with few exceptions pass blindly by one of the most patent
principles of God's rule: the inner segregation of the species of all living beings on this earth.

Even the most superficial observation shows that God's restricted form of propagation and
increase is an almost rigid basic law of all the innumerable forms of expression of His vital
urge.

Every animal mates only with a member of the same species. The titmouse seeks the
titmouse, the finch the finch, the stork the stork, the field mouse the field mouse, the dormouse
the dormouse, the wolf the she-wolf, etc.

Only unusual circumstances can change this, primarily the compulsion of captivity or any other
cause that makes it impossible to mate within the same species. But then God begins to resist
this with all possible means, and His most visible protest consists either in refusing further
capacity for propagation to bastards or in limiting the fertility of later offspring; in most cases,
however, He takes away the power of resistance to disease or hostile attacks.

This is only too natural.

Any crossing of two beings not at exactly the same level produces a medium between the level
of the two parents. This means: the offspring will probably stand higher than the racially lower
parent, but not as high as the higher one. Consequently, it will later succumb in the struggle
against the higher level. Such mating is contrary to the will of God for a higher breeding of
all life. The precondition for this does not lie in associating superior and inferior, but in the total
victory of the former. The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus
sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he after all is
only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher
development of organic living beings would be unthinkable.

The consequence of this racial purity, universally valid in Nature, is not only the sharp outward
delimitation of the various races, but their uniform character in themselves.

The fox is always a
fox, the goose a goose, the tiger a tiger, etc., and the difference can lie at most in the varying
measure of force, strength, intelligence, dexterity, endurance, etc., of the individual specimens.
But you will never find a fox who in his inner attitude might, for example, show humanitarian
tendencies toward geese, as similarly there is no cat with a friendly inclination toward mice.

Therefore, here, too, the struggle among themselves arises less from inner aversion than from
hunger and love. In both cases, God looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle
for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the
struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the
healthiest.

And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of
resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.
If the process were different, all further and higher development would cease and the opposite
would occur. For, since the inferior always predominates numerically over the best, if both had
the same possibility of preserving life and propagating, the inferior would multiply so much
more rapidly that in the end the best would inevitably be driven into the background, unless a
correction of this state of affairs were undertaken. Nature does just this by subjecting the
weaker part to such severe living conditions that by them alone the number is limited, and by
not permitting the remainder to increase promiscuously, but making a new and ruthless choice
according to strength and health.

No more than God desires the mating of weaker with stronger individuals, even less does He
desire the blending of a higher with a lower race, since, if He did, His whole work of higher
breeding, over perhaps hundreds of thousands of years, night be ruined with one blow.

Historical experience offers countless proofs of this. It shows with terrifying clarity that in
every mingling of white blood with that of lower peoples the result was the end of the cultured
people.

North America, whose population consists in by far the largest part of Germanic
elements who mixed but little with the lower colored peoples, shows a different humanity and
culture from Central and South America, where the predominantly Latin immigrants often
mixed with the aborigines on a large scale. By this one example, we can clearly and distinctly
recognize the effect of racial mixture. The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who
has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the
master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.

The result of all racial crossing is therefore in brief always the following:


-Lowering of the level of the higher race;

-Physical and intellectual regression and hence the beginning of a slowly
but surely progressing sickness.

To bring about such a development is, then, nothing else but to sin against the will of the eternal
creator.
And as a sin this act is rewarded.
When man attempts to rebel against the iron logic of God, he comes into struggle with the
principles to which he himself owes his existence as a man. And this attack I must lead to his own doom.

[Didymus Much]

I believe you mistakenly omitted the attribution (don't want to be accused of plagiarism, now do we?):

Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler



Volume One - A Reckoning
Chapter XI: Nation and Race

So do we get the "a stopped clock is right twice a day" justification for quoting a Catholic, or do you have something else in mind?

[Titus Templeton]

I don't see any similarities.