Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Rachel
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism
There's the link
|
Now that we can agree that agnostic does not mean what you think it means let's examine the whole of the matter.
An agnostic beleives there is not enough evidence to decide whether God is real. Is this really a logical position to hold?
There is mountains of evidence that Jesus existed in a non spiritual form in the Bible(KJV1611). This is positive evidence. That fits with secular sciences own rules. But what about evidence that God does NOT exist?
Well here's the thing: by the scientific methodology (look it up on wiki) negative evidence (eveidence that something is not true or proving a negative) is in admissible as evidence if one is using the scientific method.
So where does that leave us? With a mountian of evidence to say Jesus is real but no admissible evidence that God is a fairy tale.
As an agnostic (and following the scientific methodology) where does that leave your decision on Jesus?
God bless.