[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by __MK__

However this thread does not adress evolution, it adresses the primordial ooze. Here, one huge mistake is made. The video grossly oversimplifies the enormous set of circumstances that needed to take place for life to exist.

So what you are saying is, that it is highly unlikely to have actually happened. Which only proves our point that it didn't happen at all.

And I must state that the primordial ooze theory is just that, a theory.

Exactly.

Guess what, scientist have recreated the set of conditions to make this simple bacteria and it worked. Look it up.

Scientists do not have a great track record with these things. They also claimed Cold Fusion, The Nacirema Tribe, The Disappearing Blonde Gene, Archaeoraptor and Piltdown Man to be true. All of these turned out to be hoaxes just like evolution, heliocentrism and the big bang.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by __MK__

First of all, evolution does not contradict all sects of christianity. [...]

If a social gathering of people exist that do not accept God's Word, then they are not christians; they may call themselves Christians but, because of the trademark, they cannot call themselves "True Christians™".

A jar of peanut butter is not a controlled labratory setting.

Oh, I see but the Big Bang () was?

[Sam_the_saved]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

So what you are saying is, that it is highly unlikely to have actually happened. Which only proves our point that it didn't happen at all.

Exactly.

Scientists do not have a great track record with these things. They also claimed Cold Fusion, The Nacirema Tribe, The Disappearing Blonde Gene, Archaeoraptor and Piltdown Man to be true. All of these turned out to be hoaxes just like evolution, heliocentrism and the big bang.

Do not forget the most recent disaster for Evilutionists - the discovery of an angel on Mars.

http://www.techchee.com/wp-content/u...and-220108.jpg

[Jeff_Celler]

Do not forget the most recent disaster for Evilutionists - the discovery of an angel on Mars.

Strange, on other parts of this site I have heard that the telescopes in space where a lie.
So how could they notice an angel on mars? Normal telescopes on the surface of the earth can't be strong enough for that. To much interference from the atmosphere.
From all the accounts in the bible they look like humans and are more or less the same size. So how can you find something on a planet that is more or less 54.6 million kilometers away if you deny that they even have the technology to create and utilize an telescope strong enough to notice it?

You guy's contradict yourselves a lot don't you?

[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler

You guy's contradict yourselves a lot don't you?

Just like the Bible we never contradict ourselves.

[Sam_the_saved]

Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler

Do not forget the most recent disaster for Evilutionists - the discovery of an angel on Mars.

Strange, on other parts of this site I have heard that the telescopes in space where a lie.
So how could they notice an angel on mars? Normal telescopes on the surface of the earth can't be strong enough for that. To much interference from the atmosphere.
From all the accounts in the bible they look like humans and are more or less the same size. So how can you find something on a planet that is more or less 54.6 million kilometers away if you deny that they even have the technology to create and utilize an telescope strong enough to notice it?

You guy's contradict yourselves a lot don't you?

As far as I am aware the device used for taking photographs is called a camera, not what atheists and muslims call a "telescope".

Furthermore if this startling evidence fails to convince you, have you heard of the unholy invention an overseas sect of God-deniers have allegedly constructed, called a "Large Hadron Collider"?

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Originally Posted by Sam_the_saved

As far as I am aware the device used for taking photographs is called a camera, not what atheists and muslims call a "telescope".

Furthermore if this startling evidence fails to convince you, have you heard of the unholy invention an overseas sect of God-deniers have allegedly constructed, called a "Large Hadron Collider"?

You could try the search function if you weren’t so lazy. The Landover Biblical scholars and esteemed researchers are well aware of the affront to God and the "Large Hadron Collider".

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=14716

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=30936

[Sam_the_saved]

Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan

You could try the search function if you weren’t so lazy. The Landover Biblical scholars and esteemed researchers are well aware of the affront to God and the "Large Hadron Collider".

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=14716

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=30936

I am aware of both threads, please do not be mad. I mean you no harm.
I was bringing the foolish contraption up to pose the various dilemmas it poses for atheistic scum such as "Jeff".

[avielmenter]

The problem with this experiment is that no scientists believes life to have come from peanut butter. The peanut butter "Experiment" uses the wrong materials in the wrong conditions for an incorrect amount of time, and they actually don't even check to see if life has formed.

This "experiment" is essentially like "proving" that water can't boil by putting one drop of gasoline in a freezer for half a second, taking it out, then not even looking at the gasoline.

[Bible Student]

Originally Posted by avielmenter

The problem with this experiment is that no scientists believes life to have come from peanut butter. The peanut butter "Experiment" uses the wrong materials in the wrong conditions for an incorrect amount of time, and they actually don't even check to see if life has formed.

This "experiment" is essentially like "proving" that water can't boil by putting one drop of gasoline in a freezer for half a second, taking it out, then not even looking at the gasoline.

Why would we want to put gasoline in our freezers? And you heathens call True Christians™ crazy.

[Brother Temperance]

Originally Posted by Ksevio

Because I always eat it before it grows into a monkey. Don't want monkeys filling up my pantry.

Proof that you can't be a real Darwinist. If you were a true Darwinist, you'd love a pantry full of monkeys to worship and/or fornicate with.

Originally Posted by __MK__

First of all, evolution does not contradict all sects of christianity. If one were to take the word of the bible metaphorically, not literally like LOB, then evolution agrees with christianity.

Yes, but if you're going to do that, then God disagrees with what you call "Christianity".

Originally Posted by avielmenter

The problem with this experiment is that no scientists believes life to have come from peanut butter. The peanut butter "Experiment" uses the wrong materials in the wrong conditions for an incorrect amount of time, and they actually don't even check to see if life has formed.

This "experiment" is essentially like "proving" that water can't boil by putting one drop of gasoline in a freezer for half a second, taking it out, then not even looking at the gasoline.

Alright, if this experiment is flawed, then do your own experiment, using the right materials and the right conditions, and spontaneously create all life on earth. I'm waiting.