Creation Science The origins of life and the earth from a creationist (Biblical) perspective. |
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 160
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
01-29-2010, 06:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrustingBoy
... if nothing died then there would be no reason for the species to reproduce. And without reproducing it would not evolve. A good point about the owls and mice but that would only make sense if they were all locked in a open room together...
|
Boy, the reason critters reproduce is for the fun of it. If you was ever on a farm or zoo , you would see the look in their eyes. They like it. They aint' lookin' to evolve, they are looking to make some whoopie and jest have a good time. {you get a girlfriend and marry her and you will see what I mean }
Furthermore, you simply can not get a mouse and an owl to mate. They don't even like each other, and I am pretty sure the owl is looking more at the mouse like it is his next meal.
Now a little off-topic but iffin' you feel a deep self conciseness infeariority complex about the answers you been gettin', it is cause the questions you ask are a little on the ignorant side. No offense inteneded , but boy, you are not reading the Bible are you?
Have ya thought that "your way of thinking" is pretty incompleat?
Go towards the Light and seak some salvation, and for Heaven sake, quit playing with the evolutionist. They will just get you in trouble cause they are p*ssed off they can't proove their half-arsed theory. They can't even get to first base answering evolutionism questions.
Example:
How did life get started?
Scientist don't know.
{See , I told you they were trouble.}
Answer: The Bible has the answer, see Genesis
Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
Sister Verna Too {she thinks you should have your Pappy tell ya about the birds and bees}
PSS ... Sister Petal is single, and we do have a fine Meet Christian Singles Forum. Maybe it be time to quit diddling your self over evolution and practice some real pro-creatin'. You'll see how fun it is, and ya won't even think of evolving.
|
|
True Christian™ Creation Scientist Landover Baptist University Associate Professor Smashing atheist science one fact at a time
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,446
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Flood Hydrology Lab, Landover University, Freehold, IA
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
01-29-2010, 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
PSS ... Sister Petal is single, and we do have a fine Meet Christian Singles Forum. Maybe it be time to quit diddling your self over evolution and practice some real pro-creatin'. You'll see how fun it is, and ya won't even think of evolving.
|
Sister Petal might be a little young for that, Brother.
Nevertheless, there is always Miss April. I think you two would fit nicely together.
Sweet Lord Jesus,
I want to pray for those who persecute me, my Lord.
Please, treat their children as you treated those of Egypt, when they upset you! (Psalm 135:8-9)
Dash their little children against the stones for their fathers iniquity! (Psalm 137:8-9)
Hit them on the cheek, and smash out their teeth! (Psalm 3:7)
Make their death and descent into Hell swift and terrible! (Psalm 55:15)
Scatter their broken bodies over the streets of their evil cities, like Benghazi, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Mecca! (Psalm 110:6)
Praised be Your Glorious Name™.
Amen.
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 76
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
01-29-2010, 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
They aint' lookin' to evolve, they are looking to make some whoopie and jest have a good time. {you get a girlfriend and marry her and you will see what I mean }
Furthermore, you simply can not get a mouse and an owl to mate. They don't even like each other, and I am pretty sure the owl is looking more at the mouse like it is his next meal.
|
I like your answer, and I agree that animals mate for the sake of whoopie as you put is but they still evolve regardless. On a side note I know what you mean lol.
And I never said anything about a mouse and on owl mating, not sure where you got that. Did you read the whole post and the one I was replying to, or did you only read the small part you quoted me on?
My parents are highly specialized sponges.
|
Unsaved trash, uppity lieberal teenager
|
|
Posts: 25
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Under Pastor Ezekiels' bed.
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
|
Sharks are the perfect predator. They have had no reason to evolve cause they are perfectly adapted to their environment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?
|
There used to be water on Mars and...ITS MARS..its 100 times larger than Earth...of course there would be a great flood.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
|
This question is very opinionated and should not even be listed here. It all depends on what you would classify as a stupid human. To you, it would be anyone who is not a 'true' christian. But as we can see, society is filtering out that noise already. But if this is a matter of mental disability, here is my answer. 500 years ago, people with Trisomy 21 and other mental disabilities would not be able to survive on their own. Because of medical advancements of the modern age, we are helping these people to live longer and happier lives. Higher population of people with these disabilities, the more children being born with these disabilities. Its simple. Read a Biology textbook before you make these stupid assumptions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
|
Another stupid question. Our evolutionary advantage is our brains, they are why we have sentient thought and make up such things as religion, etc. It is why we have conquered above all the rest. Why would we need a third arm? thats stupid. Again, go to the library..rent a Biology textbook. Get your facts straight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
|
This is a very touchy subject and has nothing to do with evolution. Its a personal choice and i know i won't win this argument with you people so i won't even try.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
|
Another stupid question. There were a lot less people back in the day. So your math is incorrect and its called DECOMPOSITION. Our bodies decompose when we die and go back into the Earth. AGAIN, bio textbook.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
|
Angels and Demons are a human invention. Another touchy subject. Science and Religion do not mix. If you understand anything about evolution, there is no such thing as angels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
|
Another religion-based evolutionary question. The two DO NOT mix. In evolution/science, snakes never talked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
|
Nobody REALLY believes in the Loch Ness monster. Its a superstition that keeps people interested. Another stupid question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
|
Trees also need oxygen to survive. The higher up into the atmoshpere you go, the less air you will find. Its impossible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
|
WE DID NOT EVOLVE FROM MONKIES! Go read a bio textbook, please. We evolved from the same species that monkies evolved from. That is why we are so biologically similar. They just went one way, we went a different way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
|
One, monkies do not taste good so we do not have any real reason to 'exterminate' them. Two, we did do a good job of exterminating a lot of the creatures on this Earth and now humanity is doing its best to preserve them. Stupid question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
|
The Dodo had a very small habitat and had a very fragile niche. Human beings destroyed that and made the species go extinct. Your facts are WAY off. GO READ A BIO TEXTBOOK.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
|
This is insulting. Any scientific evolutionist, logical man you presented this question to...would slap you in the face.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
|
Another opinated question. The Bible very liability is not proven. And your facts are off again...atleast use google or something...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
|
There is no such thing as anti-wasp poison. It sounds like your getting your 'facts' on evolution...from the Wild Wild West. Will Smith is an actor...not a scientist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
|
Again, too controversal. This actually disproves the Bible. If Cain did get busy with his sisters than we WOULD all be inbred idiots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
|
The English believed their rulers were the voice of god and hand-chosen by him. They would make their records look like that. Propaganda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
|
Unicorns never exsisted. Stupid question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
|
They decomposed before they fossilized. Fozzilization takes millions of years..even if a one-celled organism was preserved, we would not be able to find it. it is way way too small. Dumb question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
|
READ A BIOLOGY TEXTBOOK! THIS QUESTION IS SO SO SO SO SO SO STUPID. NO WHERE...NO WHERE IN EVOLUTION DOES IT STATE THAT LIFE CAME FROM MUD.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
|
That is like asking if rocks have feelings. Stupid question. Does your god claim that chemicals think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
|
A decent question. But just as stupid and worded horribly. We have not developed a 'second' skin because of that exact reason. We made our own 'second skin'(clothing) so we never had a reason to grow our own.
|
|
Trying to out-Methuselah Methuselah You kids get off his lawn!
|
|
Posts: 22,424
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Close to God
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 08:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasevan
Sharks are the perfect predator. They have had no reason to evolve cause they are perfectly adapted to their environment.
|
Then why are we not all sharks?
Quote:
There used to be water on Mars and...ITS MARS..its 100 times larger than Earth...of course there would be a great flood.
|
Not even atheist scientists believe this.
Quote:
It all depends on what you would classify as a stupid human.
|
It would require a mirror to explain this to you.
Quote:
Another stupid question. Our evolutionary advantage is our brains
|
Somehow when you say that it is not very convincing.
Quote:
The Bible very liability is not proven.
|
Of course it is a proven fact. The Bible is the proof God exists and God created the Bible. But you will never figure this out if you refuse to read it and waste time on reading biology fairy tales instead.
Quote:
Will Smith is an actor...not a scientist.
|
What would the difference be? Scientists are just actors who try to steal tax money with their acts. Just Google for "climategate" (>12,000,000 hits) or follow the link in my signature to see PROOF scientists are liars.
Quote:
READ A BIOLOGY TEXTBOOK! THIS QUESTION IS SO SO SO SO SO SO STUPID.
|
READ THE BIBLE. YOUR ANSWER IS SO SO STUPID.
Freedom means voting for Donald Trump!
To most "Christians" The Bible is like a license agreement. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree". All those "Christians" will burn in Hell!
James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 56
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
Then why are we not all sharks?
|
Why dont all birds look the same, why are all fish not identical, why are all reptiles not alike? Its because different species have different climates. Microclimates can affect the trasnition of evolution over thousands of years. And sharks have changed. the Charcharadon Megaladon was an ancestor of the shark today. Sharks have evolved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
Not even atheist scientists believe this. ?
|
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6849802.ece
They found it, no believing required.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
What would the difference be? Scientists are just actors who try to steal tax money with their acts. Just Google for "climategate" (>12,000,000 hits) or follow the link in my signature to see PROOF scientists are liars.
|
Research particular items, i bet you have neaver even heard a whisper of 99.9% of the researchers and scientists who have help made discoveries.
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 56
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 09:19 AM
If you can accuratly tell me what the "Higs Boson" is i'll give you a cookie, only if you dont look it up.
|
|
Trying to out-Methuselah Methuselah You kids get off his lawn!
|
|
Posts: 22,424
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Close to God
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caboose
Sharks have evolved.
|
Chasevan claimed sharks had no reason to evolve. You claim sharks evolved. See how many inconsistencies there are in these evolution theories? We do not have this problem, the Holy Bible has facts instead of theories, it is very clear and it is very consistent.
http://kingjbible.com/genesis/1.htm " In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. ... And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. ... And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."
Chasevan claimed Mars to be 100 times larger than Earth. How does your link prove that? Like I already said not even atheists scientists believe that. It's complete nonsense. Apparently only you and chasevan believe Mars to be 100 times larger than Earth. Athesists don't (they believe it to be smaller) True Christians don't (they believe it to be much much smaller). But I suppose it is nice for the both of you to have found someone of equal stupidity.
Quote:
Research particular items, i bet you have neaver even heard a whisper of 99.9% of the researchers and scientists who have help made discoveries.
|
Ever heard of lies, big lies and statistics? I assure you that number is not even close to 99.9%. Please note I do not claim all scientists to be liars, some of them did some great work, but a lot of them just falsify data to get government grants.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caboose
If you can accuratly tell me what the "Higs Boson" is i'll give you a cookie, only if you dont look it up.
|
No need to. I know. Some scientists believe it plays a role in gravity. But the search for the God particle is clearly blasphemy and it is no accident the great evil donut of Satan has been having problem after problem.
Freedom means voting for Donald Trump!
To most "Christians" The Bible is like a license agreement. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree". All those "Christians" will burn in Hell!
James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 56
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 09:33 AM
Chase may have not actually completed as much marine biology research as myself. but alas.
Either or... i beleive my views to be right.
You beleive yours, as they are our views we could argue untill the cows come home.
Alas, i must now go to work, play with all my lizards and snakes. I'll take some pictures for you!
Ciao for now!
|
|
Trying to out-Methuselah Methuselah You kids get off his lawn!
|
|
Posts: 22,424
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Close to God
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caboose
Chase may have not actually completed as much marine biology research as myself. but alas.
|
So if you learn a little biology they learn you sharks did not evolve and if you learn a lot of biology you learn sharks evolved? What else will they change if you learn even more biology? Does that not make you suspicious? Does that not show you that you are being deceived by false prophets?
Matthew 24:24 "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
I am amazed you are still unable to see the truth. I will pray that you will see the light of our Savior Jesus Christ at some point in your life.
Freedom means voting for Donald Trump!
To most "Christians" The Bible is like a license agreement. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree". All those "Christians" will burn in Hell!
James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
|
Unsaved trash, uppity lieberal teenager
|
|
Posts: 25
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Under Pastor Ezekiels' bed.
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man
So if you learn a little biology they learn you sharks did not evolve and if you learn a lot of biology you learn sharks evolved? What else will they change if you learn even more biology? Does that not make you suspicious? Does that not show you that you are being deceived by false prophets?
Matthew 24:24 "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
I am amazed you are still unable to see the truth. I will pray that you will see the light of our Savior Jesus Christ at some point in your life.
|
Its proven that Mars is much larger. I will not get into an argument backed up by superstitious facts. The Bible is not valid enough proof.
|
|
WARNING: Do not attempt to debate. You will lose horribly.
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 3,261
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: God's Favorite Country
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasevan
Its proven that Mars is much larger. I will not get into an argument backed up by superstitious facts. The Bible is not valid enough proof.
|
So basically, you are saying that YOU decide what constitutes valid or invalid proof.
Your decision making process for proof is this:
- Does the proof invalidate my beliefs? It must be superstituous nonsense!
- Does the proof VALIDATE my beliefs? OF COURSE it's true!
Please explain to us Christians again why you believe that dismissing the Bible as proof is a compelling argument.
I take my orders from Jesus H. Christ, supernatural born US citizen
Be wary of false Kumbaya Christians who use a highlighter and scissors to read the Bible. God wants us to read the lines, not between the lines. False Christians will go to Hell:
Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Matthew 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Asking a Christian to prove God exists is like asking him to prove his phone rings because yours doesn't. Make that call yourself! Dial 0800-get-on-your-knees-and-pray.
|
|
Trying to out-Methuselah Methuselah You kids get off his lawn!
|
|
Posts: 22,424
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Close to God
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasevan
Its proven that Mars is much larger. I will not get into an argument backed up by superstitious facts. The Bible is not valid enough proof.
|
The point I have made in several posts now is that Mars is not 100 times larger than Earth. This is indeed proven by The Holy Bible but even hell bound atheist scientist believe Mars to be smaller than Earth, not bigger.
Even evilpedia agrees with me on this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars
Quote:
Mars has approximately half the radius of Earth. It is less dense than Earth, having about 15% of Earth's volume and 11% of the mass. Its surface area is only slightly less than the total area of Earth's dry land
|
Freedom means voting for Donald Trump!
To most "Christians" The Bible is like a license agreement. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree". All those "Christians" will burn in Hell!
James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
|
|
True Christian™ Creation Scientist Landover Baptist University Associate Professor Smashing atheist science one fact at a time
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,446
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Flood Hydrology Lab, Landover University, Freehold, IA
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasevan
Its proven that Mars is much larger. I will not get into an argument backed up by superstitious facts. The Bible is not valid enough proof.
|
We don't believe Mars to be bigger than earth. as Mars is just a little dot in the sky created by God on Day 4.
Atheist lientists believe Mars to be a planet with a smaller size than earth, which, according to them, explains why Mars doesn't have an atmosphere, its gravitational force is too small to retain an atmosphere (We of course know that Mars doesn't have an atmosphere because it's a little dot of light, not a planet).
Sweet Lord Jesus,
I want to pray for those who persecute me, my Lord.
Please, treat their children as you treated those of Egypt, when they upset you! (Psalm 135:8-9)
Dash their little children against the stones for their fathers iniquity! (Psalm 137:8-9)
Hit them on the cheek, and smash out their teeth! (Psalm 3:7)
Make their death and descent into Hell swift and terrible! (Psalm 55:15)
Scatter their broken bodies over the streets of their evil cities, like Benghazi, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Mecca! (Psalm 110:6)
Praised be Your Glorious Name™.
Amen.
|
|
True Christian™ Just a Regular Nice Guy
|
|
Posts: 29,835
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between Lynchburg and Walton's Mountain
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-05-2010, 05:06 PM
I think Mars is smaller than the moon.
I know it is less than 500 miles away, being closer than the sun (the has been established to circle the Earth at approximately 500 miles) and therefore it must be fairly small, probably not much bigger than Rhodie Island.
Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
Amos 3:6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?
Numbers 21:6 And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.
Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Matthew 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
Matthew 10:36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
|
|
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
|
|
Posts: 11
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: in my parent's basement
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-12-2010, 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;
Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
Good question. We did not exactly evolve from fish, but from a common ancestor of the fish (e.g., an animal which split off into two or more other species, due to evolution, which involved the development of today's fish and, eventually, us). Sharks, in their original habitat, probably suffered a mutation which allowed Natural Selection to help favor its existence underwater. We, on the other hand, might have experienced a mutation allowing us to store air in an air pocket, thus allowing us to breathe outside of water, and eventually, be able to sustain ourselves outside of water.
Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/b]
Mars is speculated to have had water a long time ago. Besides; there is no mention in the Bible stating that Mars was involved in the Great Flood, which no scientific evidence backs up anyway.
Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
No matter the stupidity of a human, our modern medicine allows them to survive. The concept of Natural Selection barely applies to us anymore, because we can cheat this "survival of the fittest" now. That is what differs us from other species.
I don't think you ever thought of killing someone because he / she was unintelligent, either.
Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
We have no need for them, therefore, whenever a mutation occurs which begins this sort of thing (such as a bump beginning a ligament,) we normally do not allow them to survive, or reproduce at least. I don't think one would want a three-armed husband / wife, so they would never be able to pass on this three-armed gene.
Remember that evolution only works in gradual steps. You won't see anyone receive a genetic mutation which causes it to receive an entire extra arm.
Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
[u]We aren't "evolved" to nature our young; this is something which came along with the development of the Limbic part of the brain, which regulates emotion, as well as morality (which, no, we did not receive from religion; unless you truly believe dogs have religion because they do not kill their young)
We also have reasoning now. If one does not want to have a baby, and gets pregnant by mistake, reasoning tells us that a solution is abortion. A fetus is not a human life, and is not born yet, therefore we do not treat it as a baby until it is born.
Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
You are leaving out the fact that organic matter decomposes with the aid of bacteria. Why else do you think an apple rots when we leave it out in the open for several weeks? Same concept applies to human bodies. This matter turns into mineral-filled compost, or dirt.
So, theoretically, we are standing on all of these corpses; just not in a bodily form.
Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
This question is unanswerable because you are asking us to find the common ancestor of something which does not scientifically (or morally, for that matter) exist. However, I can tell you that the technical true common ancestor would be some sort of bacteria which originated 4 billion years ago. Some think it is a form of RNA cells.
Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
Again, this is unanswerable because there is no proof of a snake ever existing. The only proof is your Bible, which is, in a technical sense, unsubstantial in terms of evidence.
Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me
Same answer.
If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.
I laughed at this. Trees do not go through evolution in the same way that animal cells do. In fact, they don't even go through Natural Selection anymore (at least, not enough to make any sort of difference). This is basic sixth-grader science... and I highly doubt a scientist would have told you this.
If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben
Again, decomposition applies. Organic material is not like the trash you place in your blue garbage bags...
Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
[B]
Because we are not monkeys; we share the same common ancestor. Our brains have grown, unlike theirs (which continues to, but nevertheless is not at the same level as ours).
Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
Not if the humans grew separately from the monkeys, nor if the human race never wanted to kill unnecessary creatures. You don't see lions attacking everything they see (for lack of a better example ).
Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
First off, the dodo lived in a small island off the coast of South Africa, near Madagascar. Its population was very slim and does not go across the world like calf. When humans explored the island and probably shared diseases with the dodos, which did not have immunity to these bacteria, it went extinct very quickly.
Secondly, it does not take millions of years to have a species go extinct when you have humans doing the job indirectly. Mass hunting and urbanization / deforestation wipes out many species every year.
Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
Unanswerable due to lack of evidence of aforementioned species.
Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
Did you ever think that maybe, just maybe the Bible was written by primitive humans in antiquity, who did not know of these previous ancestors? Without the help of a God? As in, perhaps God does not exist? I'm just thinking rationally here.
Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC66oXIDGc8
How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
Unanswerable because you are using characters from the Bible to create an argument.
The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
Didn't read because the question is useless to answer.
Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
Again.
Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
I'm sorry to say I am not knowledgeable in geology. I suggest reading The Blind Watchmaker, where Richard Dawkins debunks questions related to transitional fossils.
Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
[u]"Darwinism" is not a valid concept. No one knows exactly where life came from. They are only theories. All we know is that somewhere in between then and now was water, bacteria, and, according to my first answers, evolution to fish from a common ancestor. Again, we do not come from fish.[u]
Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
Ugh.
Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
[u]Oh my god (pun intended). Possibly one of the stupidest questions I've ever heard.
Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.
|
Answers are underlined. Hope I've answered in a way you'll understand.
- Eric
|
#63 on Forbes'...but #1 in Jesus's Heart
|
|
Posts: 6,234
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Freehold, Ia
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-12-2010, 01:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericleb010
Answers are underlined. Hope I've answered in a way you'll understand.
- Eric
|
Poppycock, you think we evolved from fish and monkeys all in 6,000 years. That is just plain silly. Pick up a Bible, open it and read. The answers are revealed in the FIRST BOOK!
|
|
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
|
|
Posts: 11
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: in my parent's basement
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-12-2010, 01:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Dewitt
Poppycock, you think we evolved from fish and monkeys all in 6,000 years. That is just plain silly. Pick up a Bible, open it and read. The answers are revealed in the FIRST BOOK!
|
In 6,000 years? Are you kidding me? We have TREES older than that (the oldest tree is over 10,000 years old.
Silly Christians.
|
|
True Christian™ Creation Scientist Landover Baptist University Associate Professor Smashing atheist science one fact at a time
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,446
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Flood Hydrology Lab, Landover University, Freehold, IA
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-12-2010, 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericleb
In 6,000 years? Are you kidding me? We have TREES older than that (the oldest tree is over 10,000 years old.
Silly Christians.
|
Dendrochronology is an atheist hoax. The very link you provided tells us that that tree is younger than 6000 years.
Wacky atheist.
Sweet Lord Jesus,
I want to pray for those who persecute me, my Lord.
Please, treat their children as you treated those of Egypt, when they upset you! (Psalm 135:8-9)
Dash their little children against the stones for their fathers iniquity! (Psalm 137:8-9)
Hit them on the cheek, and smash out their teeth! (Psalm 3:7)
Make their death and descent into Hell swift and terrible! (Psalm 55:15)
Scatter their broken bodies over the streets of their evil cities, like Benghazi, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Mecca! (Psalm 110:6)
Praised be Your Glorious Name™.
Amen.
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 12
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer -
02-12-2010, 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Oh, so having a third arm would not be an advantage?? If someone had a third arm they would be able two work a third faster and get better jobs. Since you Darwinists claim Panda’s lost and re-grew their thumbs and third arm should be child’s play.
Even if they ate them all assuming an average of 100lbs per person that would be 75 billion tons of human remains in worm guts.
Face, your answers are weak. Worse they hypothetical because you lack direct observation. That is were we Creationists trump you, we have the ultimate direct observer; God. Now turn your lives over to Jesus.
|
Actually, if we had a 3rd arm, we would work 50% faster, not a third. If we had 3 arms and went down to 2, then we would work 33% slower.
Also- There haven't always been as many people in the world as there are today. Your prediction of the numbers of bodies that need to decompose is ridiculously high. And in the scheme of things and how old the earth is, people decompose to nothing pretty quickly.
Revelation 22:18-19 "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of this prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
|
Tags
|
abortion is abomination, darwinism: monkey worship, dinosaurs = dragons, disproving evolution, fish, lies of secular science, noah's flood, question for science, science verses faith, snakes: tempter of women, texas, texas textbooks |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|