[lord warrior]

The English, in a rare form of Godly thinking, has decided that 2 men should be let off easy because the 10 year old girl they "attacked" was provocativly dressed and passed as a 16 year old. It was not a forcible rape, just a 10 year old hussy doing two males. Naturally the press had a field day.
one said:Yesterday Dr Michele Elliott, of Kidscape, said: "This is beyond pathetic, it is utterly derisory. For the judge to say that the way she was dressed in any way excuses a 24-year-old man having sex with her is disgraceful and ridiculous."


But I disagree. How are we ever going to change the world if the little girls can dress and act like sluts and get away with it. Only when we as a nation realize that these "children" are just as much a tool of the devil as some hooker, can we change. As long as this country allows girls as young as 10 to flaunt there sexuality, and ensnare the weakest of us men,can we hope to be a shining light for Christ. America was best when we treated are children like the adults. Then we can return to a christian education that all of children need. A harlot is a harlot, no matter what age.

A news link for our feminazi's http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21969117-2,00.html

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Another obvious case of feminazis taking advantage of an unsuspecting Man.

Those loose girls are the ones who should be prosecuted, in my opinion. I for one am tired of being tricked and hoodwinked by their uppity, slut-like behavior and dress.

[Glendora Christianson]

I applaud the judges Christian wisdom. So many activist judges twist our laws to try and create a "victim society". Unfortunately, all women (even me) have Eve's sins to bear and it is a travesty in this day and age that a harlot goes unstoned. Women must hide their uncleanness with at least three layers of clothing unless told to do otherwise by a True Christian male.

PS Forgive me, Jesus for posting in the Men's forum.

[lilith]

Originally Posted by lord warrior

The English, in a rare form of Godly thinking, has decided that 2 men should be let off easy because the 10 year old girl they "attacked" was provocativly dressed and passed as a 16 year old. It was not a forcible rape, just a 10 year old hussy doing two males. Naturally the press had a field day.
one said:Yesterday Dr Michele Elliott, of Kidscape, said: "This is beyond pathetic, it is utterly derisory. For the judge to say that the way she was dressed in any way excuses a 24-year-old man having sex with her is disgraceful and ridiculous."


But I disagree. How are we ever going to change the world if the little girls can dress and act like sluts and get away with it. Only when we as a nation realize that these "children" are just as much a tool of the devil as some hooker, can we change. As long as this country allows girls as young as 10 to flaunt there sexuality, and ensnare the weakest of us men,can we hope to be a shining light for Christ. America was best when we treated are children like the adults. Then we can return to a christian education that all of children need. A harlot is a harlot, no matter what age.

A news link for our feminazi's http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21969117-2,00.html

What was he wearing,then? Paedophiles are ok by TC standards,apparently.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by lilith

What was he wearing,then? Paedophiles are ok by TC standards,apparently.

Well I think its safe to assume that he WASN'T wearing a pink frilly miniskirt and a slutty see-through halter top like certain old hags have been spotted in, trolling ports of call where the Ukranian Navy docks.

[lord warrior]

Originally Posted by lilith

What was he wearing,then? Paedophiles are ok by TC standards,apparently.

She was not charged with a crime that could get him life in jail, he was.
He will do time in jail, and then be branded as a child rapist for life because some stupid,useless mother let her daughter go out looking like some slut, and then lured these poor men into having sex with them.

The consequences for her are none, unless you want to count her "getting some". She was guilty as they are in the eye's of the lord, and for that she will get the ultimate sentence one day.

[Brother Temperance]

Originally Posted by lilith

What was he wearing,then? Paedophiles are ok by TC standards,apparently.

Where in the Holy Bible does it define the "Age" of "Consent"?

Originally Posted by lord warrior

The English, in a rare form of Godly thinking, has decided that 2 men should be let off easy because the 10 year old girl they "attacked" was provocativly dressed and passed as a 16 year old. It was not a forcible rape, just a 10 year old hussy doing two males. Naturally the press had a field day.

What a Godly decision. A man raping a 10-year-old is sick and wrong, but if she looks 16, it's just a minor misdemeanor. Like littering or running a red light, it's wrong, but hardly deserves a life sentence.

Originally Posted by Secular news

The same judge caused uproar earlier this year by setting free another paedophile and telling him to give his victim money "to buy a nice new bicycle".

What a nice thing to do. He should probably have told him to buy her some sweeties as well.

[lilith]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

Well I think its safe to assume that he WASN'T wearing a pink frilly miniskirt and a slutty see-through halter top like certain old hags have been spotted in, trolling ports of call where the Ukranian Navy docks.

And which of them was the adult? I use the term very,very loosely.

[Brother Guy Bayard]

"quote"What a Godly decision. A man raping a 10-year-old is sick and wrong, but if she looks 16, it's just a minor misdemeanor. Like littering or running a red light, it's wrong, but hardly deserves a life sentence."quote"




Indeed. One only has to look at the Muslim Prophet Mahommed and his 9 year old Bride to realise how vulnerable all godly men are when faced with the wiles of these filthy creatures.
History doesnt record whether Mohammeds 9 year old child bride dressed in alluring head to toe burqas, or sluttish face veils, but its obvious that she must have been, given the hideously ugly nature of these hirsute,olive skinned female moon worshippers. A head to toe covering actually increases their sexual desirability, in the same way we crave hot dogs, hungering for the 'misrepresentation' of the product, blissfully unaware that the contents are utterly disgusting offal scrapings.

[Nobar King]

Maybe the girls in England should start wearing burquas to hide their tender young bodies from the savage eyes of men... Oh, wait, I think a lot of them already wear them.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

As a demonstration of how diaperheads think, here is the Mudslum 'take'.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/age3.htm

[Rachael Van Helsing]

England let's men off, 10 year old a harlot

???

Congratulations, your misuse of grammar has succeeded in making the title of this thread utterly devoid of sense. Well done.

[hellion]

How, in God's name, can you mistake a ten-year-old for 16? Dude should be shot! What was that pedophile's name again?

[lord warrior]

Its in the article. And this "rape" was allowed by Jesus to show the girl of her sinful ways. And to show that England is all about the devil, they say nothing of it being a true rape. This little slut girl wanted them to do it, and gave so willingly. All these little English girls are becoming wanton sluts at earlier ages now. These poor men only gave into the temptations of this little harlot because they believed her lie about being old enough for sex.
Why should they suffer because of a little English slut?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by hellion

How, in God's name, can you mistake a ten-year-old for 16?

Does THIS ring a bell?

Most of these 10 year old girls are sluts, unless they've been raised in a True Christian™ home.

[hellion]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

Does THIS ring a bell?

Most of these 10 year old girls are sluts, unless they've been raised in a True Christian™ home.

Still doesn't look 16. You can tell that's a little kid. And the girls can't be to blame for the man's wrong doing! The Bible clearly states not a man nor a woman is to have premarital sex. And rape is far off from getting married and having consentual baby-making.

[Brother Guy Bayard]

Originally Posted by hellion

Still doesn't look 16. You can tell that's a little kid. And the girls can't be to blame for the man's wrong doing! The Bible clearly states not a man nor a woman is to have premarital sex. And rape is far off from getting married and having consentual baby-making.

The bible clearly states that raping someones fiance is punishable by death.
Deuteronomy 22:25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.
HOWEVER
Single unattached wimmens are fair game
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

Its my understanding that the 10 year old girl was unbetrothed and a wanton slut to boot . She was probably a prostitute, and should be imprisoned, or flogged or both.
Therefore the men are completely free from wrongdoing.
The bible is quite clear on this matter.

[Father Burns]

Where did the word rape come from?

0.28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;029:Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

[Brother Temperance]

Originally Posted by Father Burns

Where did the word rape come from?

0.28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;029:Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

More to the point, where have all these vile Catholics come from? Did a child porn site link to us or something?

[Marshall]

This would be a non-issue if parents dressed their children like children instead of like little whores. She was clearly seducing these guys.