[MitzaLizalor]

The grading system Dr Toole's implying originated with the Indians themselves. Migration after the flood, East from Babel, must have been in two waves. Migrants from Africa crossed the straits of Bab al-Mandab and Hormuz to settle in India but later migration from elsewhere provided a ruling caste and rigid prejudice against the earlier wave from Africa who, presumably, were descended from Ham.

There must have been hybrids over the centuries though because high caste Indians are readily distinguished from the rest among themselves. They can detect descendants of the former wave of migrants a mile off and, where they're allowed to work at all, assign them to latrine attendant duties. Marriage is completely off the table. No doubt they could arrange something in another country but lips would still curl and eyebrows arch.

[WWJDnow]

Originally Posted by Alvin Moss

Before you can join the choir, you must move to Freehold. Before you can move to Freehold, you must be invited. Before you are invited to Freehold, you must join Landover Baptist Church. Before you can join the Church, you must be saved and accepted. Before you can be saved and accepted as a member of the Church, you must accept Jesus as your personal savior.

You left out the spanking ritual.

Just kidding. Seriously, do what Brother Moss suggests and work on accepting Jesus. I'd start by reading the Bible--the whole thing.

[Johny Joe Hold]

This mongrelization of the races has many bad outcomes. Think of the legal aspects. Obama, a mongrel, would not come up with a valid birth certificate. Camala Harris, another mongrel, no birth certificate. Come on, people. We know you are mongrel, put it down on paper.

Everyday there are more mongrel babies. Will they all hide their birth origins like Obama and Harris?

[handmaiden]

Mongrels are indeed a problem. Can you believe how many people are proud of being mixed? Some people even celebrate America as a nation of mutts.

There are those who decry the existence of "overbred" dogs. How can something be "over" bred? I have heard of "inbread" dogs, such as this:

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

There are those who decry the existence of "overbred" dogs. How can something be "over" bred?

I know, right? As long as at least one animal in the litter can live at least three years before inevitably succumbing to a disease such as eye problems, hearing loss, joint problems, breathing difficulties, spinal injuries, or the other diseases which are caused by breeding sisters with brothers for generations, I don't see a problem!

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

I know, right? As long as at least one animal in the litter can live at least three years before inevitably succumbing to a disease such as eye problems, hearing loss, joint problems, breathing difficulties, spinal injuries, or the other diseases which are caused by breeding sisters with brothers for generations, I don't see a problem!

Hey, if it was good enough for Abraham and one or two of King David's kids, who are we to argue?

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Hey, if it was good enough for Abraham and one or two of King David's kids, who are we to argue?

Exactly! Inbreeding is a God-given Biblical tradition espoused by many of the Prophets.

[MitzaLizalor]

Which lineage led to Jesus? The French? Aztecs? Vietnamese? Of course not. Christ was descended from a just and righteous line, uncontaminated, perfect for Sacrifice so that we could be Redeemed.

Sometimes I wonder if heathens have any standards at all.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Which lineage led to Jesus? The French? Aztecs? Vietnamese? Of course not. Christ was descended from a just and righteous line, uncontaminated, perfect for Sacrifice so that we could be Redeemed.

Sometimes I wonder if heathens have any standards at all.

Indeed, Sister. Now, people of little faith question Jesus' lineage, which ends at Joseph, who has no biological relationship whatsoever to Jesus - not to mention that the lineages presented by Luke 3:23-38 and Matthew 1:1-16 vary quite significantly. To those naysayers, we respond with:

1 Corinthians 1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

Let them be baffled and confused by these supposed "contradictions." We know that the Bible is the Pure Word of God and therefore there are no contradictions even where there they seem to be apparent.

1 Corinthians 4:10 We are fools for Christ's sake, but ye are wise in Christ; we are weak, but ye are strong; ye are honourable, but we are despised.

[MitzaLizalor]

And yet these very people want us to be sensitive to "other cultures" such as secularism, heathens, papists & savages even if they worship mutilation & mayhem everywhere they go promoting Stone Age values (dark age in the case of papists) when this little question is so much simpler!

Here is a word list:
TYSKLAND
ALLEMAGNE
GERMANIO
NJEMACKA
DEUTSCHLAND
IGCIWANE

All those words signify the same thing in Danish, French, Esperanto, Croatian, German and Zulu respectively. It's the name of a country. Just because when writing two different friends use their own versions of a name doesn't make them contradictory! Simarly for names of people; the Chinese and Egyptian variants could seem very different on the surface but underneath they're the same.

Again from time to time different societies adopt different naming traditions, Levirate marriage accounting for some of these, which different authors may treat differently. God has already explained that Scripture is reliable so there's our assurance that contradictions don't exist. For others seeking to deny His guarantee, they'd need to address each and every point concerning names and lineages (for the same person i.e. Christ) but I've yet to see them do so.