[Johny Joe Hold]

I'll say this for that country called England. They got it right when they made the King or the Queen the head of its official church. Think of how much sin could be eliminated here in the U.S. if we had an arrangement like that.

A problem came up recently, however. The Queen was losing her zest for stamping out sin late in her life and, of course, Satan took advantage. The Church of England ruled its clergy could conduct and bless wedding of two of the same sex. The Queen must have been in a dire straight to have allowed that.

Charles III must move quickly and decisively to overturn this. He now holds the sceptre. He must smash it down hard on homer marriage. Any Anglican priest that marries homers get a whack.

Church of England votes in favour of blessings for same-sex unions | Anglicanism | The Guardian

[WWJDnow]

Not going to happen. After all, King Charles' own marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles is itself a homosexual marriage.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by WWJDnow

Not going to happen. After all, King Charles' own marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles is itself a homosexual marriage.

What you are saying, Brother Dnow, it quite disturbing. There is reason to think you are correct.

[WWJDnow]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

What you are saying, Brother Dnow, it quite disturbing. There is reason to think you are correct.

Hey, I'm not judging. I think it's wonderfully romantic that these two elderly gentlemen have found love in their lives. Another phallus in the palace, as they say.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by WWJDnow

Hey, I'm not judging. I think it's wonderfully romantic that these two elderly gentlemen have found love in their lives. Another phallus in the palace, as they say.

The thing is, the King does not have to adhere to the specific rules he lays out for others. God wrote The Ten Commandments. They include "Thou Shalt Not Murder." Let's not talk about God and His Ten Commandments. The King can make his country better. He will need resolve, however, and I'm not sure it's there.

[WWJDnow]

Amen. Human laws do not apply to the king, who is chosen by God. But kings are still bound by God's laws. Sinners such as King Charles are constantly flaunting the Ten Commandments and other Biblical injunctions.

BTW, I case anyone cannot recognize the sarcasm in my last post, I really am judging. Homosexuals, as the Apostle Paul told us in Romans 1:27-32, are worthy of death. They should never hold any office of public trust from dog catcher on up to king. Only morally upstanding men who love Jesus and who have sex with attractive and pre-menopausal women, men such as Donald Trump, are fit to be anointed king.

In the case of King Charles, his obvious homosexual tendencies aren't even the most damning fact against him. The worst part is that he is a Mohammedian. I never thought I'd live to see the day an Islamicist would be made head of the Church of England--even given their other depravities--but I was wrong. If they really want their church leadership to be filled with homos, they might as well merge it back in with the Catholic church.

[Dennis Lukes]

His Majesty's Gouvernment serves at his pleasure. All he has to do is dissolve Parliament and rule by decree. He could then issue royal edicts to the effect that the KJV Bible is the law of the realm. He could also do this in Canada, Australia, and several other dominions not important enough to list. The subjection of over 150 million people worldwide to Biblical law would be a MAJOR coup. Too bad Charles is an inbred, horse faced sinner.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Anyone who looks into the history of British Kings comes to understand why there is little hope King Charles III will put a stop to homerism. There is plenty of suspicion about men who have worn the crown. Here is a portrait of King Charles 1st:

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

There is plenty of suspicion about men who have worn the crown. Here is a portrait of King Charles 1st:

Guilty as charged, Mr. Mayor. Some of us like myself have a special radar-like ability for this stuff - you can tell he's a queer immediately.

Originally Posted by WWJDnow

Amen. Human laws do not apply to the king, who is chosen by God. But kings are still bound by God's laws.

Theoretically though, Brother, English Kings are the head of their own variant of Christianity and can modify the rules as deemed necessary in close consultation with the divinity. King Charles could simply swat away the 10 Commandments and make homosexuality compulsory. Everyone would have to do it.

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

Here is a portrait of King Charles 1st:

King Charles II was, if anything, even more flamboyantly homosexual:





Note the seductive look in his eyes and 'come hither' hand gesture. He probably screwed the painter afterwards. Long flowing curls reminiscent of an '80s glam rocker and the wispy mustache of the old-school queer. And is he wearing a dress? Charles II was known as the "Merry Monarch" because his reign allowed for more sin and debauchery than the Commonwealth of Puritan Oliver Cromwell. What's a synonym for "merry?" - Gay. That's right, king of the homers.

[Elmer G. White]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

Anyone who looks into the history of British Kings comes to understand why there is little hope King Charles III will put a stop to homerism. There is plenty of suspicion about men who have worn the crown. Here is a portrait of King Charles 1st:

Dear Mayor, Brother in Christ.

I agree that the situation in the Good Olde England is dismal and that the inhabitants of that sorry excuse of a Kingdom will probably be personally Smitten by Jesus with his oral sword within the next decade or so.

Revelation 19:21
And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

This is because I am now convinced, based on thinking and Prayers, that Mr. King Charles of the third class is a flaming sodomite. Why? Because it is now the objective truth™ that his Mother, the late Quuen Liz raised him like that. Why? Let us consider the state of the British female! They have absolutely no sense of style! Behold the typical hens' night out in the towns of Birmingham, Liver Pool or during a man-hunt in Man Chester:



Tacky, provocative yet because of the intoxicated state, more sorry than sexy. Unthinkable on the catwalks of New York or the Pervert city of Paris. Because of this, English lassies need an expert to tell then what to wear, how to apply cosmetics, how to prepare a decent cosmopolitan, etc., etc. The sodomite man has the superior male brain and, when twisted from childhood, can use the surplus of brain cells (compared to the females) to designing garments and accessories. That is why most British women now choose to raise their sons as gaysexuals. If we consider the case of the late Queen, let us look at her wardrobe during the early days of her rambunctious reign:



Dull, gray, a prison gown at best. The consort's tie is monotone and more fit to a concentration camp than a palace. No wonder the young king-in-waiting looks horrified. By cultivating these tendencies in her young son, the late Queen produced an adviser in style, and while the press has mostly been quiet about his tendencies, some happenstances were too blatant to dismiss:



And the result was a giant success for the late Queen. During her latter days, the late queen became an immaculate rhyparographic regal representative, as we can observe below.



Hence, no hope for the islets of Britain, on the ousted Her Brides or the Shitland Isles, nor for Orcnests! Our hope lies in President Trump and Jesus.

Revelation 2:16
Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.

Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Johny Joe Hold]

There is no end to thread of royal homerism that is the history Britain. King Richard the Lionheart, buff as a gay street walker, had a "wife" but seldom saw her. His affairs with the King of France are well known. The crusades with young male soldiers were a gay frolic.

God save us from that wicked country.


Why Richard I shared his bed with the king of France | Monarchy | The Guardian

[Isabella White]

Originally Posted by Elmer G. White

Dear Mayor, Brother in Christ.

I agree that the situation in the Good Olde England is dismal and that the inhabitants of that sorry excuse of a Kingdom will probably be personally Smitten by Jesus with his oral sword within the next decade or so.

Revelation 19:21
And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

This is because I am now convinced, based on thinking and Prayers, that Mr. King Charles of the third class is a flaming sodomite. Why? Because it is now the objective truth™ that his Mother, the late Quuen Liz raised him like that. Why? Let us consider the state of the British female! They have absolutely no sense of style! Behold the typical hens' night out in the towns of Birmingham, Liver Pool or during a man-hunt in Man Chester:



Tacky, provocative yet because of the intoxicated state, more sorry than sexy. Unthinkable on the catwalks of New York or the Pervert city of Paris. Because of this, English lassies need an expert to tell then what to wear, how to apply cosmetics, how to prepare a decent cosmopolitan, etc., etc.

Amen, dear Brother Dr. White! I think it's just common knowledge that English ladies have no class — none whatsoever! It's so apparent in the photograph that you have so kindly provided. And here is more proof of the trashy state of England's womenfolk, in the video clip below. Imagine the finishing-school effect that King Charles could gayly impart to this sorry strumpet!

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Elmer G. White

A characteristic pose from English (and Commonwealth) womanhood. Charlie will have his work cut out there. It wasn't clear which two were getting married but these are the least of his worries. Here are a few examples, in one or two cases I've included a "background" to show what the creatures themselves think they're doing (and probably seeing) whether genderstereopypified or not. Mostly they're not of course in this environment, an alternative paradigm applies so they comply with that. Here is a small selection.

Although the clothes are not immodest in the same way as the trollops on the bar, they nevertheless glorify the same lewd spirit. Satan. Does the king regard himself as the defender of demonolatry? Many of his subjects come into that category but can enough prayer be brought to the mercy seat to spare England? It's so concerning. I have decided to paint my bathroom and reline the sauna facility. There are quite a lot of fumes but so far the walls still look OK: no weird paisley patterns: I will pray for Charles in accordance with Scripture.

I Peter 2:15-17 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: as free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king.