[Liberalism-satan's philosophy]

Originally Posted by Wide-Open

Interesting. So you have nothing against eternal torture, as long as the promoter of such lacks any belief pattern. Or, if you will, has a non-extreme belief pattern.

Is it me, or is that slightly weird?

We have God. You only have hate and rage.

I will pray for you girl.

That is weird. What's even more weird is that's not what I said. But fair enough, that seems to be the level we're at.

Nah mate, I have decency and love. You just have the bile you spew.

Oh? Go for it. Send your abominable God my way, I'd quite like to have a word with him.

Originally Posted by Larni69

I think the clue is in his name. ExGay Alex simply chose to be not gay (proofing it is a lifestyle choice ).

If only more sodomites could stop haunting horrendously hideous public toilets for their revolving door anonymous ghastly, gaysexual galavanting the world would be a better place!!

Lev 20:*13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Lev 20: 15 And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast

Maybe you should read the good book

Jesus guides my hand!
Posted via Mobile Device

Two things there - firstly, it is not a lifestyle choice. If he truly was gay, the only lifestyle choice he is making is hiding it from you scaremongering witches. Secondly - and it's helpful that you quoted Leviticus 20:13 - I thought a man who lies with another man "shall surely be put to death"? Sounds like someone's not following the Bible to the letter here...

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

Oh I know what he wants: he wants more people to vote for him so if fluffy bunny Christians who have never read a Bible in their life and just listen to the vicar in their village church think he's a nice man and vote for him all the better. He wants to cherry pick all the bits that fit his agenda.

But he is playing with fire as God is watching and Biblical values means the whole Bible and our God is a god of vengeance and wrath.

By which you mean Christians who can find peace in their religion without resorting to extremist hate? Cherry picking seems to be the way forward.

And your God needs to get laid.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

By which you mean Christians who can find peace in their religion without resorting to extremist hate? Cherry picking seems to be the way forward.

Not at all. I mean people who are prepared to ignore the vast majority of God's word in order to use Jesus' name to con people into giving more credence than is their due to whatever opinion they are putting forth. People pushing a cheap con trick that they are better people by pretending to offer Salvation to people desperate to find favour with God but in actual fact selling them a fake stripped down shell of what Christianity actually is.

If God hates what I'm doing I need to know about it so I can stop before I offend God so much He kills me then burns me forever. I don't need some con artist telling me I can be as gay as I want to be and fellate as many men as I can stomach and God doesn't really mind because times have changed so I will be his friend.

But you go and cosy up to those guys if you like and see where it gets you. I'm betting that they won't get you into Heaven when you die and you'll kick yourself for all the times you respected their thinly veiled garbage rather than denouncing them to their faces and pointing out what Jesus REALLY had to say.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

...let the rest of humanity forever be rid of your parasitic views. You are utter scum!

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

...Sorry, I guess we all make mistakes...
Least mine don't include following an extremist belief pattern.

Riiiiiiight.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

... You just have the bile you spew...

Pssst: you misspelled "Bible".

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

Oh? Granted I am not David Cameron's biggest fan, but I invite you to direct him to this thread before claiming to know what he wants. I am not so sure you and he would agree.

I know, let's ask HIM! (Sorry for the source; it's the first reference I found.)

The British [God-Haters] Association has condemned remarks made by Prime Minister David Cameron, in which he stated that Britain was a Christian country, that it was only as a Christian country that Britain could be welcoming of those of other religions, and that Christian values could reverse British society’s ‘moral collapse’.

"ExGay" Alex? What did you have to do to avoid being stoned to death then?

He lived in a country that is not yet under Biblical Law.

And for my comment, I can only apologise for my error. I meant to say "all life, bar those who show a complete and conscious disregard for nearly all other life" i.e. you people. Sorry, I guess we all make mistakes...

Least mine don't include following an extremist belief pattern.

You mean like the one you just demonstrated in the previous paragraph?

You know, where you said that all life, except the lives of people who you disagree with, is valuable?

Originally Posted by Liberalism-satan's philosophy

Two things there - firstly, it is not a lifestyle choice. If he truly was gay, the only lifestyle choice he is making is hiding it from you scaremongering witches. Secondly - and it's helpful that you quoted Leviticus 20:13 - I thought a man who lies with another man "shall surely be put to death"? Sounds like someone's not following the Bible to the letter here...

Please show me the scientific evidence which demonstrates the "homosexual gene". (Hint: There isn't one.)

Then show me the scientific evidence which demonstrates that homosexuals are unable to control their lustful urges, and are forced by their vile nature to rape children. (Please, show me that, so we can arrest them all.)

You see, if there's no gene for it, and they can in fact control their lustful urges, then sodomitious perversion is, by definition, a choice.

As for your snide queries about stoning, the Bible commands us to follow secular laws. Until we can get a Christian president and Congress, and fix the laws.

Or, I suppose, a Catholic like Santorum will do.

By which you mean Christians who can find peace in their religion without resorting to extremist hate? Cherry picking seems to be the way forward.

Forward to Hell, certainly. Enjoy.

And your God needs to get laid.

Aren't you glad we don't have blasphemy laws yet, like Saudi Arabia?

[Liberalism-satan's philosophy]

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

I know, let's ask HIM! (Sorry for the source; it's the first reference I found.)?

Sounds like he, along with most other people, is under the misimpression that Christian values are ones of morality and decency. Oh well...

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

He lived in a country that is not yet under Biblical Law. ?

That doesn't usually stop you advocating the death of homosexuals.

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

You mean like the one you just demonstrated in the previous paragraph?

You know, where you said that all life, except the lives of people who you disagree with, is valuable??

That isn't what I said. I think cheddar is the best cheese, I don't think the life of everyone who disagrees with me no longer matters.

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

Please show me the scientific evidence which demonstrates the "homosexual gene". (Hint: There isn't one.)

Then show me the scientific evidence which demonstrates that homosexuals are unable to control their lustful urges, and are forced by their vile nature to rape children. (Please, show me that, so we can arrest them all.)

You see, if there's no gene for it, and they can in fact control their lustful urges, then sodomitious perversion is, by definition, a choice.

As for your snide queries about stoning, the Bible commands us to follow secular laws. Until we can get a Christian president and Congress, and fix the laws.

Or, I suppose, a Catholic like Santorum will do. ?

If we're going to play that game, show me the scientific evidence that there is a heterosexual gene.

And there isn't any, because you can't provide evidence for something that isn't true.

And good luck with that...

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

Forward to Hell, certainly. Enjoy.

Will do.

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

Aren't you glad we don't have blasphemy laws yet, like Saudi Arabia?

I am, despite this forum demonstrating the downside to freedom of speech.

[James Hutchins]

I am confused. How can you 'murder' a Goth. Aren't they already dead?
Sort of like hitting a dog on the way to Church. Does it really matter if you hit it again on the way home?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

I believe that although Goths are dead inside they are technically premortem.

But then to look at their morbidly moribund, sallow and sickly, vacuous visage, who could really tell the difference?

1 Corinthians 11:30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Holy Roman Emperor]

This teenager is a terrible person, not for killing the goth woman, but for not using God's favourite method of punishment, stoning. I believe he should be lightly stoned as a demonstration and punishment before being released to continue to contribute to GOD'S WILL ®, but in the proper way instead.

[Chessman.exe]

Praising a 15 year-old boy for murdering a goth?
I suppose you can just throw the sixth Commandment out the window.
You guys are so pro-life, which is great, but when that soul grows up and makes the choices they do to become goth, murdering is okay?

Exodus 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.

People have really bad things happen to them to become goth, but this does not make them bad people, it makes them bad examples.
If God wanted someone dead, He would sure make sure they would die, but not at the hands of man.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Chessman.exe

If God wanted someone dead, He would sure make sure they would die, but not at the hands of man.

Where does it say that in the Bible?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Chessman.exe

If God wanted someone dead, He would sure make sure they would die, but not at the hands of man.

Clearly, you have never even cracked a Bible. There is nothing so common in it as God commanding people to kill.

Deuteronomy 17:12

King James Version (KJV)

12And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the LORD thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.


Leviticus 20:13

King James Version (KJV)

13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.


Leviticus 20:27, Exodus 21:15, Proverbs 20:20, Leviticus 20:9, Leviticus 20:10, Leviticus 21:9, Exodus 22:19, 2 Chronicles 15:12-13, Zechariah 13:3, Deuteronomy 13:13-19, Deuteronomy 22:20-21, Deuteronomy 13:7-12, Deuteronomy 17:2-5, Leviticus 24:10-16, Deuteronomy 13:1-5, Deuteronomy 18:20-22, Romans 1:24-32, Numbers 1:48-51, Exodus 31:12-15, Isaiah 14:21, Ezekiel 9:5-7,
just to name a few.

[xLilandrax]

Originally Posted by frosty

You are one sick person, One person killed a nother and you are saying it is ok, you really need to do some hard thinking about where you are, I think people like you are the ones turning our children away from God I really do ,,, you really scare me

Thank God I'm not the only one who thinks that! No matter what, a person shouldn't condone another person ruthlessly killing another! That is one commandment after all! I am truly disgusted by the people on here applauding a drunk kid for stomping a girl's head in! Would Jesus have done that? Don't think so.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by xLilandrax

...Would Jesus have done that? Don't think so.

No, He wouldn't. Instead of just robbing her of a few years of life on this planet, He'll resurrect her into a new, immortal body, and then throw her into a lake of fire to be tormented for all eternity, her flesh burning off as she screams in agony, only for it to be miraculously healed, ready for for the torture to begin all over again, forever and ever and ever. Amen.

That's soooo much better.

Her attacker, on the other hand, still has the chance to repent and accept Christ as his Saviour, and be rewarded with a golden mansion in Heaven.

Ain't Christianity awesome?

[Dr. Ernest C. Ville, D.C.S.]

Originally Posted by xLilandrax

Thank God I'm not the only one who thinks that! No matter what, a person shouldn't condone another person ruthlessly killing another! That is one commandment after all! I am truly disgusted by the people on here applauding a drunk kid for stomping a girl's head in! Would Jesus have done that? Don't think so.

Wait, are you saying that your feeble Xanax-riddled brain is more prescient than the omniscient Creator of the universe? This changes my whole rationale on right vs. wrong, up vs. down! Thank you for revealing your own personal beliefs to me, because clearly they are much more valuable than those written down over 4,000 years ago by the Creator of all that exists.

Let me ask you: if you got into an argument with an earthworm, whose opinion would you say is more valid? The personal with higher-order mental functions (although with you, I have my doubts) or a worm that crawls around eating dirt?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by xLilXanax

Thank God I'm not the only one who thinks that! No matter what, a person shouldn't condone another person ruthlessly killing another! That is one commandment after all!

What if it was a homosexual? After all, we're commanded to execute them.

Would that be OK with you, since the 'stomper' would be following God's commandments?