[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Think about it, you never hear about people shooting up gun stores. Am I right?

[Prayer Warrior]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Now that we have had a few days to calm down from all this (and bIf Our Lord and Savior chooses to give us a hard "No" in response to so many fervent Christian prayers maybe we need to change our prayers.

I, for one, do not wish to stand in opposition to Jesus. If there is something that He keeps denying us no matter how many times we ask, then maybe it is time to stop asking. Instead, we need to repent from our selfish prayers and ask Jesus what He wants.

Others mentioned perhaps there was a good reason for mass shootings in America to continue and this might be it:




https://www.oswaldcompanies.com/medi...the%20location

Why Active Shooter Coverage is Needed Now More Than Ever


The standard insurance policy for active assailant events is designed to cover a business when a person is actively engaged in killing or attempting to harm someone, extending to those 650 feet from the location. In the event of a hostage event, the coverage is triggered when an assailant has a weapon and holds one person for more than one hour.
But Oswald Companies has developed enhanced coverage that allows business owners and managers to respond quickly and thoughtfully to any incidents, so they can focus on the duty of care they feel toward students, employees and the public. The Oswald policy is triggered by any active assailant event, using any weapon, and includes coverage for those injured up to 1,000 feet away. An example of the need for extended coverage was the Mandalay Bay shooting In Las Vegas, when the assailant was roughly goo feet away from those Injured or killed.
For coverage purposes, active assailant includes vehicles, explosive devices or any Instrument used to cause harm, maim or kill others. Unlike other policies of this kind, no motive is required for coverage to begin with an enhanced policy.
In the event of a hostage situation, the enhanced coverage kicks in if one person is held for one hour. It will also cover hoax incidents or If the weapon involved turns out not to be a real threat.
This enhanced policy covers both property damage and business interruption, including denial of access to the location and subsequent event cancellations. The policy also offers ancillary support, with coverage of medical costs and death benefits for up to 24 months, including victim rehabilitation and repatriation, if necessary, of those deceased.
One of the most crucial benefits of this enhanced policy Is access to a crisis management team. With the policy, the insured are given a number to contact immediately after calling local emergency services. Then they will be put in touch with a specialized team, composed of former FBI agents and police officers, who will set up a crisis team at your headquarters or the location of the incident to offer support services.

Much like how big pharma benefits from lack of national healthcare and rewards our lawmakers for their help in keeping healthcare capitalism alive ( https://www.statnews.com/feature/pre...full-data-set/ More than two-thirds of Congress cashed a pharma campaign check in 2020, new STAT analysis shows) with private healthcare agencies, this might be another area where the loving and guiding hand of the free market can intervene.
Think of all the jobs that would be lost if there were no mass shootings in America.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by Prayer Warrior

Others mentioned perhaps there was a good reason for mass shootings in America to continue and this might be it

What a heartwarming story, Brother Warrior. A good insurance plan is needed to cover lost business in shooting areas. Capitalism steps forward to provide it. Businesses can buy this insurance and not worry about paying bills after the shooter is taken down. Praise Jesus.

This does not help end the shooting, but it will be easier to manage.

[Bjorn Jensen]

The Highland Park shooter wore women's clothing.

Clearly what we need to do now is to ban men from wearing women's clothing, ban drag queen story hours and ban men from having access to women's clothing stores, just like we did with the public bathrooms. The libs say we need to ban the guns, well what about going to the source of the problems instead?

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Dangerous drag queens need to be excluded from public libraries, like NOW!

[Johny Joe Hold]

There was another school shooting today. Pundits everywhere are talking and talking about how to stop these. It's "license guns", it's "find troubled kids earlier," etc. etc.

The school shootings started when schools became woke. Stop woke and the shootings will stop. It's that simple.

'A family's worst nightmare': Biden reacts to Nashville shooting, urges assault weapons ban (msn.com)

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

Dangerous drag queens need to be excluded from public libraries, like NOW!

It was a tranny who shot up the school in Nashville Mayor Hold mentioned. A Christian school. This was a targeted attack on us by the left. Biden invited a tranny to the Oval Office a couple weeks ago - coincidence?

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes

It was a tranny who shot up the school in Nashville Mayor Hold mentioned. A Christian school. This was a targeted attack on us by the left. Biden invited a tranny to the Oval Office a couple weeks ago - coincidence?

Was it a girl pretending to be a boy, or a boy pretending to be a girl? The news I saw on this subject did not provide these details.


Either way, feminists should be happy, because that's another "glass ceiling" that has been broken - as far as I know, all previous mass shootings were done by men. Whether this one was a girl pretending to be a boy, or a boy pretending to be a girl, it is the first time a woman (either real or someone imagining to be one) did a mass shooting.

[WWJDnow]

If I've said it once, I've said it a million times. If you arm school children, these school shootings will stop. Think about it--would you go on a shooting rampage in an elementary school if you knew that there were a bunch of armed five-year olds ready and willing to take you out?

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

it is the first time a woman (either real or someone imagining to be one) did a mass shooting.

That's inaccurate sister, there have been a small number of female mass shooters. However, due to feminine incompetence, these are rarely mass casualty events. This broad managed to bag six, but that's still a woefully low body count compared to a Stephen Paddock, an Omar Mateen, or a Seung-Hui Cho. Certainly nowhere near enough to crack the bottom of the leaderboard. Consider Adam Lanza, a man, who massacred 28 under the same circumstances as Audrey Elizabeth Hale. Tsk tsk. I fear the only reason we're talking about this at all is because of the novelty of a girl doing it. Affirmative action right there, a man would have to blow away a minimum of a dozen people to make the national news.

Thoughts and prayers, back to business.

[Adam Fag]

Hi! .Why .not just ban guns?

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Originally Posted by Adam Fag

Hi! .Why .not just ban guns?

Now you're just being silly, dear. If you ban guns then the only people with guns will be the bad guys, i.e. the very people that we need to be able to defend ourselves against. Because (and this may shock you) the bad guys typically don't obey things like bans on weapons.


Guns are mostly banned in Godless Britain - I mean, obviously people like my husband are allowed to own them, but as a general rule we are restricted to using them on our own property. As a consequence, most unlawful killings now involve knives. Would you also ban knives? Good luck with eating your dinner!

[Isabella White]

Originally Posted by Adam Fag

Hi! .Why .not just ban guns?

Please, Mr. Fag; don't you think you're being entirely ridiculous with such an outrageous statement? I am sure that I do not have to discuss the Second Amendment with you. Besides that, banning guns would go against the Will of the !

Kindly refrain from further shameful suggestions, especially here — at !

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Mr. Fag is engaging in wishful thinking here rather than the proven thoughts and prayers. Unfortunately he's not the only one. The Senate chaplain Barry C Black (who should know better) foolishly blurted: "When babies die at a church school, it is time for us to move beyond thoughts and prayers."

Also adding, apparently without pause, "Lord, deliver our senators from the paralysis of analysis that waits for the miraculous. Use them to battle the demonic forces that seek to engulf us. We pray, in your powerful name, amen."

Perhaps Fag can discover the wisdom of Mr. Black's message rather than making hasty judgements without knowing all the facts - and certainly, certainly not pushing a political agenda. We do not even know, for example, if this transexual has or does not have a p*enis or v*agina. How do you even pronounce hir??? So many unanswered facts.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

I''m sure "the paralysis of analysis that waits for the miraculous" looked impressive on paper, but did anyone ask him what it's supposed to mean?

[MitzaLizalor]

I think the real problem lies with the prayer, rather than the guns. Presbyterians, being Scottish, are not completely unmitigated savages like assorted variations of European paganism whose cults even a savage could see have nothing to do with The Bible. Nevertheless, despite Jesus telling us about the frequency of prayer I Thessalonians 5:17, when in Scotland it's obvious that Church members do many activities other than prayer, such as driving vey fast along their scenic highland roads.

Surely the time for thoughts and prayers would be before the shootings, rather than afterwards? If that were so, insofar as prayer is concerned, there would be no shootings. Other than savages shooting one another of course – but they either don't pray or pray to the wrong gods or use heretical forms of words. Take your pick. None of those would any effect but going out on a limb here, even Presbyterians' prayers would reach Jesus wouldn't they? That must be the first lesson to learn at any school if the tide of secularism is to be held back.

So sad.

[Elmer G. White]

Mass shootings will end when they no longer serve Jesus' agenda. If His Grand Design included the ending of shootings, it would be easy for Him to unmake their occurrences. As they continue, they must serve His interests: free will, teaching True Christians™ to arm themselves and that He did not make this Earth to be a disk of idle sodomy.

He knew what He was/is/will be doing/done - Isaiah 45:7
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

He wants us to bear weapons - Joel 3:10
Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears: let the weak say, I am strong.


We must constantly thank Lord Jesus for His Good intentions to save us, True Christians™ and make the majority of the Earth's population suffer (Revelation 19:21) because they will not let Him in!





Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[MitzaLizalor]

Perhaps my understanding is lacking – but how is it possible to be an active sodomite and idle at the same time?

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Perhaps my understanding is lacking – but how is it possible to be an active sodomite and idle at the same time?

Please sister. We're talking about shootings here, not power bottoms.

[MitzaLizalor]

Getting back to prayer, I know that foreign types do what they call "praying" part of the time—some of them don't have gods at all so they presumably do Eurythmics or something—but they are not praying to Jesus. Whatever objective entity or internal mental state is involved, it certainly has no goodwill towards its acolytes.

EXAMPLE 1

"Migration" is the new orange and having ruined wherever they came from with their ludicrous belief systems, upon arrival do they abandon the nonsense they were indoctrinated with? Sometimes. Mostly though: no. They don't. In this way we know they are not actually migrants at all, other than in a strictly geographical sense. You see, if I one day understood that where I lived was a rotten hole governed by malevolent freaks committed only to my ongoing despair, I would leave. Sure! Anyone would!! But upon arrival wherever I decided to go, would my highest priority be to establish a poisonous freak show or construct a garish asylum for it to operate from? Not if my intention was to have escaped. But if my earnest desire is to perpetuate the hell I've left behind and see it blossom in the land I've come to?

EXAMPLE 2

Ultimatey, then, as God has already explained in Matthew 7:20 there's no need to deduce who intends what by their presence, it's on display wherever they go and when the kill rate approaches whichever place came from, the solution is equally obvious. God has explained this too, for those who care to read His instructions, but mostly it's goblins all the way down.

EXAMPLE 3

KILL RATE per 100,000