Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes
Political anti-Semitism is one of the major tenets of our far right wing ideologies worldwide. As Judaism is simultaneously a religion and an ethnic group, and as no one can change their ethnicity (Jeremiah 13:23) no Jew can truly be right wing outside of Israel, which is currently run by right wing extremist Jews like Netanyahu and Ben-Gvir. Jewish conservatives are controlled opposition. They don't believe what they're saying any more than Jewish liberals do, it's all about suppressing the "Goyim" and Jewish world domination.
|
You know, it's funny you should bring that up. I was just thinking the same thing about the heresy of Rome? God is abundantly clear on this theme, that specific geopolitical groups have specific and immutable characteristics – paramount among them being that the movers and shakers don't believe what they're saying or at least know it has no basis in reality. In the latter case they'd be using a "rose tinted goggles" approach to deception, where they run everything through an acquired translation package mounted in their brains so that unreality is uttered using words normally reserved for things we know to be true. After a while, it becomes second nature, like someone flying a kite; they think what they want the kite do do and it just happens.
Proverbs 18:14 The spirit of a man will sustain his infirmity; but a wounded spirit who can bear?
People argue about what the word "spirit" means but here it's really quite simple. We refer to "the spirit of the law" and mostly it's understood what that signifies – so readily, in fact, that when cited nobody fails to grasp what's being implied. Many different groups have a similar (or probably identical) concept but what do they all have in common? A simple classification, CLASSIFIED BY GOD, as abominable.
How do we know they know they are lying? Because they study the source material for a living. The leaders are the professors and Deans of the Faculty of their subject matter, expert witnesses if you like, doing nothing with their lives beyond scrying into its scrolls and codices with infinitesimal resolution, understanding what is recorded there to the nth degree. How often do we hear it warbled that what's available is copies of copies and translations of copies——which might be true for Swahili or one of those "click" languages——but not really. The overall scheme remains fairly consistent (for example the Qumran scroll of Isaiah compared with Alexandrian and Masoretic iterations) certainly insofar as God's very clear instruction on what constitutes abomination together with some really quite vivid analogies: one will suffice:
Isaiah 57:3-4 Draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood..?
The answer to that question is, “Yes.” How can it be lost on anyone for whom studying this is a lifetime's work? Even a crazed oil executive who took up the cloth would have the perception to identify what God's soliloquy refers to! (As if it were not spelled out elsewhere, which it is.) OK, so we've established that false teachings are false. More perplexing is the question of whether abominations themselves know that? Indoctrinated from birth into the false creed, do they ever know the weasel act is just that? Volumes written over centuries clearly twist the message to suit immediate needs. It doesn't really matter which creed or what the need is: just compare one verbose tome with another from a few centuries either side: it's obvious. Whether one agrees with the teachings or not, what they
are, right there in the source documents, is unmistakeable and essentially fairly simple.
God is Jesus and remained consistent of this point. So we're back to the OP: does Rovagnati know how to identify the brain tiara glommed on? Is his rose-goggle translation package at the kite-flying level or does he use it knowingly? Because that affects how I respond to what he claims. For the time being then, I will not do so.