[Bjorn Jensen]

This is for sure the thing i laughed most at today

Stupid evilutionist scientists claims that whales are not only a mammal (its a fish), but also that they used to be deers! According to their theory, deers started to live in water, and somehow became aquatic and lost their legs and grew larger and larger, and got blowholes, fins and flippers! I wonder if it works the other way around if i put a whale on land, will it then shrink, get legs, a nose, a tail and fur?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1220220241.htm

Hans Thewissen, Ph.D., Professor of the Department of Anatomy, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy (NEOUCOM), has announced the discovery of the missing link between whales and their four-footed ancestors.

Scientists since Darwin have known that whales are mammals whose ancestors walked on land, and in the past 15 years, researchers led by Dr. Thewissen have identified a series of intermediate fossils documenting whale’s dramatic evolutionary transition from land to sea. But one step was missing: The identity of the land ancestors of whales.

Now Dr. Thewissen and colleagues discovered of the skeleton of Indohyus, an approximately 48-million-year-old even-toed ungulate from the Kashmir region of India, as the closest known fossil relative of whales. Dr. Thewissen’s team studied a layer of mudstone with hundreds of bones of Indohyus, a fox-sized mammal that looked something like a miniature deer.

Dr. Thewissen and colleagues report key similarities between whales and Indohyus in the skull and ear that show their close family relationship.
Thewissen and colleagues also explored how Indohyus lived, and came up with some surprising results. They determined that the bones of the skeleton of Indohyus had a thick outside layer, much thicker than in other mammals of this size. This characteristic is often seen in mammals that are slow aquatic waders, such as the hippopotamus today. Indohyus’ aquatic habits are further confirmed by the chemical composition of their teeth, which revealed oxygen isotope ratios similar to those of aquatic animals. All this implies that Indohyus spent much of its time in water.

Dr. Walt Horton, Vice-President for Research at NEOUCOM commented: “This remarkable research demonstrates that the study of the structure and composition of fossil bones can tell us about how the skeleton of whales and, by extension, other mammals like humans, interacts with the environment and changes over time.”

Before, it was often assumed that whales descended from carnivorous terrestrial ancestors, and some researchers speculated that whales became aquatic to feed on ocean-dwelling fish. According to Dr. Thewissen, “Clearly, this is not the case, Indohyus is a plant-eater, and already is aquatic. Apparently the dietary shift to hunting animals (as modern whales do) came later than the habitat shift to the water.”

Although it may seem strange to think of a tiny, deer-like animal living in water, one modern mousedeer offers something of an analogue to the ancient Indohyus, even though it is not closely related to whales: The African Mousedeer (also called Chevrotain) is known to jump in water when in danger, and move around at the bottom (for a movie showing this go to YouTube and watch ‘Eagle vs. Water Chevrotain’).

Whale evolution is one of the best documented examples of mammal evolution, and Dr. Thewissen’s discovery adds a significant new piece to the puzzle.

“Not much was known about the earliest whales, until the early nineties,” Dr. Thewissen said. “But then, a number of discoveries came in quick succession.”
The article documenting Dr. Thewissen’s new discovery, titled Whales originated from Aquatic Artiodactyls in the Eocene of India, was published in the November issue of Nature. It’s authors (in order of appearance on the paper) include: J. G. M. “Hans” Thewissen, Ph.D., Professor of the Department of Anatomy, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy (NEOUCOM); Lisa Noelle Cooper, Doctoral Student, Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University and NEOUCOM; Mark T. Clementz, Ph.D., Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie WY; Sunil Bajpai, Ph.D., from the Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarkhand in India; and B. N. Tiwari, Ph.D., from the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun, Uttarkhand, India.
The research by Dr. Thewissen and his team was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).

And contrary to popular belief, whales are not mammals. Its a fish. The Bible says so.

Jonah 1:17
Now the LORD had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.

Matthew 12:40
For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

If this were true whales that beach themselves in a forest would not die of dryness, they would be quite well suited to thier environment.

Evolution is a theory in crisis

YIC

[Mary Thompson]

Those scientists think they can fool us?
Anyone (even a mere woman like myself) can tell whales did not come from deers, common sense!
YIC
Mary Thompson.

[Pim Pendergast]

I don't know how anyone can believe in the theory of evolution. It keeps changing. Back in the 60's and 70's, evolutionists used to think whales had evolved from cows, so at Creation science debates Duane Gish would show audiences a picture of an animal that was half cow, half whale to demonstrate how ridiculous evolution is. After all, if evolution were true, there should be a missing link between a cow and a whale looking something like this:

After forty or fifty years, they still haven't been able to find a fossil that is half cow, half whale, and so now they're saying whales evolved from deers. But I don't think a picture of an animal that is half deer and half whale would look any less ridiculous.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Pim Pendergast

I don't know how anyone can believe in the theory of evolution. It keeps changing. Back in the 60's and 70's, evolutionists used to think whales had evolved from cows, so at Creation science debates Duane Gish would show audiences a picture of an animal that was half cow, half whale to demonstrate how ridiculous evolution is. After all, if evolution were true, there should be a missing link between a cow and a whale looking something like this:

After forty or fifty years, they still haven't been able to find a fossil that is half cow, half whale, and so now they're saying whales evolved from deers. But I don't think a picture of an animal that is half deer and half whale would look any less ridiculous.

Amen, Brother! Nor can they explain this!


"A fossilized hammer was found in a formation famous for its dinosaurs, supposed to be 140 million years old (lower cretaceous).

Max Han was fishing with his family near London, TX when he found a rock with wood protruding from it. When the rock was cracked open, this octagonally shaped iron hammer was exposed. "

[Bjorn Jensen]

While these scientists are among the most stupid and unintelligent people on earth, you gotta admire that they are unintentionally so funny. I mean, fish getting legs, walking up on land and turning into all kinds of animals. Deers living in water and turning into whales, i mean, how do they even come up with these things

The only thing that whales are good for is the steaks and all that blubber, just ask the Swiss