[Unfalsifiable]

I was studying the Bible study threads of the Landover forum (as I do) and I recalled many years ago (I have been a member since 2008) the True Christians explained to me (a humble outsider) why the Latin Vulgate and its sinful translations was so corrupt and dangerous.


Now - you explained to me that the Vulgate takes out a key passage where the Bible explains that someone has to be aware of what' happening to be baptized; hence why they meaninglessly splash babies with water in their silly Disney Magic Kingdom micky mouse looking "churches".



Which verses was this referring to?

[Phil Ander]

Friend,

The 1611 KJV is the only Bible approved by God. That's the stairway to Heaven.

[Roland]

Originally Posted by Unfalsifiable

Now - you explained to me that the Vulgate takes out a key passage where the Bible explains that someone has to be aware of what' happening to be baptized; hence why they meaninglessly splash babies with water in their silly Disney Magic Kingdom micky mouse looking "churches".

I am pretty sure meaninglessly splashing children with water is not equal to baptizing. Getting a rodent involved makes even less sense.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Unfalsifiable

I was studying the Bible study threads of the Landover forum (as I do) and I recalled many years ago (I have been a member since 2008) the True Christians explained to me (a humble outsider) why the Latin Vulgate and its sinful translations was so corrupt and dangerous.


Now - you explained to me that the Vulgate takes out a key passage where the Bible explains that someone has to be aware of what' happening to be baptized; hence why they meaninglessly splash babies with water in their silly Disney Magic Kingdom micky mouse looking "churches".



Which verses was this referring to?

You could start off with Acts 8:29-38

[WWJDnow]

I am delighted to hear that you take Bible studies so seriously. You may be saved yet! I will pray for your redemption through the blood of Jesus.

Most English translations of the Bible omit verse 37 from Acts 8. This verse makes it perfectly clear that baptism is only effective if you already believe in Jesus as your Savior (here in the definitive Bible version, the King James 1611):

36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?

37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.

Verse 37 was in the original Latin Vulgate, but it is not in the Nova Vulgata, the Latin Vulgate version that is currently approved by the Catholic Church. The Catholics omitted this verse because it makes clear that infant baptism is not appropriate. Catholic leaders worship the Devil, not God, and their mission is to lead persons who otherwise would be saved astray with their false doctrines.

[MitzaLizalor]

https://vulgate.org/nt/gospel/acts_8.htm

[Unfalsifiable]

So it WAS in the Latin Vulgate of St Jerome, but some point the Catholics decided that they wanted to splash the children?!


This is outrageous.

[WWJDnow]

That's it in a nutshell. Catholics are constantly changing their beliefs and practices. One day there's purgatory, then hocus pocus, the Pope makes a statement, and purgatory never existed. One day there's a Hell with actual fire, then, abara cadabara, the Pope speaks and Hell is fire-free, simply a place of distance from God. Evolution was wrong, then, only 100 years after Darwin, evolution happened. At the rate the Catholics keep changing the meaning of the Bible, by the 2050's they'll be denying the existence of Jesus.

This is one of the ways you can tell that Satan has a hold on the Catholic Church. Click on the picture of the Chick Tract to learn more about the evils of Catholicism:

[johnsonjohny]

Originally Posted by Unfalsifiable

I was studying the Bible study threads of the Landover forum (as I do) and I recalled many years ago (I have been a member since 2008) the True Christians explained to me (a humble outsider) why the Latin Vulgate and its sinful translations was so corrupt and dangerous.


Now - you explained to me that the Vulgate takes out a key passage where the Bible explains that someone has to be aware of what' happening to be baptized; hence why they meaninglessly splash babies with water in their silly Disney Magic Kingdom micky mouse looking "churches".



Which verses was this referring to?

There are six direct references to homosexuality in the Bible -- three in the Old Testament and three in the New Testament. Some Biblical scholars say the passages need to be taken at face value. Other theologians say it's much more complicated. [LINK TO FALSE RELIGION REMOVED BY MODERATOR]

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by johnsonjohny

There are six direct references to homosexuality in the Bible -- three in the Old Testament and three in the New Testament. Some Biblical scholars say the passages need to be taken at face value. Other theologians say it's much more complicated.

It's not.


The Bible says that it is wrong. Therefore, if one wants to worship God as described in the Bible, one must accept the Bible's condemnation of homosexuality.


People who claim to be Christians and Gay are worshiping their own personally contrived deity as opposed to the one of the Bible. They do this because it makes them feel good. This is also not complicated. What is complicated is the process by which "Gay" Christians and so many others who wrap themselves in the mantle of Christ mentally cut and paste the Holy Book that lays out the tenets of their faith into something that--while it assuages their fears and insecurities--is diametrically opposed to what their Holy Book actually teaches. The psychological gymnastics involved in their self delusion must be exhausting to them at times. I know how tiring, (and tiresome), it can be just to attempt to educate them on the actual contents of the Bible.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Any Romans reading this thread who are thinking of modifying the Bible should watch this video from Poetically J, who aims to "inspire you to be the brightest, truest version of you so that you can bring the very best you have to offer into fruition". Or in the case of modifying the Bible, preferably not.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Brother Dr. Toole, did anyone ever actually ask for Poetically J's advice on this, or any other matter?

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey

Brother Dr. Toole, did anyone ever actually ask for Poetically J's advice on this, or any other matter?

Sister, in the same way nobody specifically asked God to write a book about our moral failings, nor to sacrifice His only son for our benefit, Poetically J was divinely inspired to use up 11 minutes and 34 seconds of the precious gift of life to explain in excruciatingly detailed video monologue the essence of her teachings. I hope that answers your question.