Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold
I looked right away for warm condolences from Obama and Hillary. I did not see any statements offering warm condolences.
|
Amen! If my entire family was slaughtered by a psychotic ISIS terrorists, warm condolences from Donald Trump himself would almost be enough to cancel it out. It'd be like your house burning down but then winning a small lottery the next day. He pretty much doesn't have to do anything else at this point because his warm condolences alone are sufficient.
Obama or Hillary's condolences, which would be cold and totally lacking in warmness, on the other hand, would only make me feel worse.
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...53465926639618
Quote:
Las Vegas, we are grieving with you—the victims, those who lost loved ones, the responders, & all affected by this cold-blooded massacre.
|
Look, Hillary's tweet even has "cold" in it. I think this is a Freudian slip describing her own feelings to the victims.
As if their insincere cold condolences weren't bad enough they'd probably also politicize the event and use it as an excuse to push more America hating, Gun banning legislation. Hillary wants to ban silencers and wants all law-abiding gun owners to go deaf just for trying to protect their homes. Besides, if you ban silencers only the criminals will use silencers. Way to give criminals the tactical advantage Hillary. I would sure hate to lose my loved ones under a Hillary presidency knowing their deaths went to further the Demoncrat agenda. Fortunately, the victims of this massacre can rest easy knowing that Trump is president and that no changes at all will be made to our gun laws no matter how many massacres or mass shootings occur during the term of his presidency.