[Bob4God]

True Christianity is in the hands of of our children, and it is our responsibility to raise them to be as passionate as we are about the Gospel.

The idea of any one of my cherished values or opinions being abandoned by future generations fills me with moral outrage, and it makes me want to smack an unsaved child with a KJV 1611.

As a True Christian parent, it is your GOD-given job to do whatever it takes to keep the Gospel in your child's heart!

Unsaved liberals will lie to you and tell you that the only thing that matters is raising an independent individual who thinks for himself. Ha!

"Independent individuals" who "think for themselves" end up creating fantasy stories about evolution, molesting little kids and making Fahrenheit 9/11. You know what happens after their reign of terror ends? THEY GO TO HELL!

Would that make you a proud parent, to know that you raised kids who went to hell?

Don't betray GOD! Beat the Spirit of the LORD into your children daily! Tell them that there is no other possible truth than what is found in the Bible!

If they have friends who aren't fundamentalist Christians, it's time for a new set of friends!

May GOD keep your children on the Straight and Narrow!

[Serenity-Millennium]

I don't think we should beat children.

http://www.capalert.com/capreports/sparetherod/

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by Serenity-Millennium

I don't think we should beat children.

http://www.capalert.com/capreports/sparetherod/

I don't normally trust liberal sites like ChildCare Action Project, and this is a perfect example of why not.

Originally Posted by the liberal-biased site that you cited

Both the law of God and the law of man are indeed complimentary and can both be obeyed if you view the "rod" in the verses not as a tool of pain and injury, but figuratively as the wooden rod of a shepherd and the way he uses it as a "rod of correction" to guide and direct.

Notice how any part of the Bible that doesn't agree with modern liberal lifestyle choices is something other than a literal expression of God's eternal will? In this case, it needs to be read figuratively. In other cases, it was "nailed to the Cross" or "meant for the church back then." Whenever liberalism doesn't conform to Scripture, Scripture has to be forced to conform to liberalism. Also, the author cites the Bible verses telling us to beat our children with the rod; just how do you beat a child with a figure of speech?

[Serenity-Millennium]

But when I show you verses that show Jesus loves everyone and that He's a communist, you tell me not to read those verses literally and that they are only meant for the church back then...

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

There's a world of difference between simple communal living of a small group of individuals and a massive state-enforced communist government. You are making a huge leap of assumption between the two by stating that Jesus supports communism.

Compare it to an anarchy. Say there is a small group of people that live together but they pretty much all agree on everything and there is no designated "leader". It's pretty much an anarchy and a peaceful one at that.

By this reasoning, would you consider making an entire nation of millions of people an anarchy simply because these few people can live in peace?

[Serenity-Millennium]

So you don't think we should follow the example of the saints set in the Bible, who were full of the Holy Spirit and taught directly by the words of Jesus?

[Star Finder]

Ha ha well then pagans have no more to fear from your cult!!

we all know what children do with their hands....



and it aint praying!