[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

For half a century, liberals have tried to launch countless movements, pet causes, and reforms. All of them have flopped, fizzled out, or been stalemated. Except one.

One idea was so powerful that it could unite all the freakish tribes of the liberal coalition. One idea held such power over the liberal mind that it defeated the leaden weight of inertia, the fierce fires of backlash, the seductive call of distraction.

What was that idea?

The idea that sex is a fundamental, universal human right. A universal right no matter how freakish your birth made you. No matter how weird your lisp, no matter how limp your wrist, no matter how unusual and intense your fascinations are, you have a right to sex, and everyone from rioters to international megacorporations are going to parade together so that everybody knows it.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all sexual urges are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are oral, anal and between the boobies.

Above: lots and lots of people saying that sex is a universal human right, even for people into cosplay

But the problem with standing up for your rights is that lesser people tend to follow your example. Like when Thomas Jefferson talked about freedom, and then had to explain to his slaves that "freedom" doesn't mean, you know, freedom.

Because gay people are not the only people who have trouble finding love. There are also people who are born ugly, short, skinny, or worst of all, white. Some people are born only to find the part of the brain labelled "social skills" has been misplaced, and in its place is an extra brain labelled "learn everything you can about trains and maybe streetcars".

Some guys are born with the kind of brain that can neither play sports nor play guitar at a level of skill sufficient to get the stamp of approval from the eugenics department that we for some reason call "dating".

Naturally, these people see half of the population parading and rioting and obsessing over the idea that weird people have a right to sex, and they say "gee, if everyone says weirdos have a right to sex, does that mean that weirdos have a right to sex?"

Liberals react viciously to this, in that way that all hypocrites do when exposed. Like the liberty-loving slaveowners of old, they say "of course "all men..." doesn't mean YOU! Of course "universal human..." doesn't mean YOU!"

And now liberals are on the same side as us. We have always been telling gays that they are not entitled to sex, that they need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and improve themselves by turning themselves straight. And you, dear liberals, are saying to nerds what we have always been saying to gays.

Hint for liberals wondering what to do next: learn from our ex-gay camps and start making ex-nerd camps. Learn from Mike Pence, who liked to electro-shock the gay away - elecrocute nerds every time they try to invent something. Sorry nerds, if it's not a one-second guitar riff or a new endzone dance, women don't want you to invent it.



Above: the Federal Department of Eugenics: protecting the gene pool from nerds since 1967.

[Johny Joe Hold]

There is one thing we know, pray the gay away works. Countless homers are now with Jesus because they left the homosexual life style behind and had wives and families and lived happily into old age.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond

elecrocute nerds every time they try to invent something. Sorry nerds, if it's not a one-second guitar riff or a new endzone dance, women don't want you to invent it.



Above: the Federal Department of Eugenics: protecting the gene pool from nerds since 1967.

It makes sense that women hate nerds, after all, feminism makes women miserable and it was nerds who made feminism. Why do women women have enough free time to go to college, get their clits pierced, and use social media to get men fired? NERDS.

Why do women not spend hours down at the stream working their scratchy woolen clothes over a rusty washboard?

Is it because some purple-haired millionaire threw a hissy fit on campus and got a professor fired?

No, it's because NERDS invented washing machines, NERDS invented plumbing systems to bring the water from the stream, TOXIC MASCULINE men dug the ditches and laid those pipes.

NERD!!!!!!!



CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE YOU PILE OF TOXINS!

Why do women not slave for hours over a wood stove, sweat stinging their burns? Did slutwalks do it? Did safe spaces do it? Did cleansing the world of microaggressions do it?


NERD!!!!!!!! TOXIC, PRIVILEGED NEEEEEERD!!!!!

Why do women not engage in a constant, futile battle with ashes and coal dust....



They have the expression of henpecked husbands - as if they already regret what they have inflicted upon the world.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond

learn everything you can about trains

Now here's a couple of gentlemen (I'm using the word in its loosest possible context) who look like they'd know about trains. But I can't say that it's had a very good effect. Similar to the millinery in OP there have been consequences for the head but in this case it's extended somewhat further. Why can't people just be normal? Then everyone would get along just fine, but obviously Christians would not associate with heathens even if they did have normal heads.

I have always enjoyed rail travel. Except for that time on a 3-day journey where in the cocktail bar people kept bumping into you so you'd go into the Hawaiian lounge but it was even worse. Can you imagine a journey where everyone looked like that? It's what they seem to want but then of course they wouldn't stand out and they be right back where they started.

[handmaiden]

Another way that Incel Terrorism can be blamed on the gay movement is that ugly, dumpy women are encouraged to become lesbians instead of having sex with ugly, dumpy men.

Now, the incels are feeling really deprived. Of course, a lot of them insist on only being attracted to really beautiful women, but the gays and their excessive use of make-up are probably also responsible for that, too.

[MitzaLizalor]

That would explain the person [POSTED ABOVE] with the peculiar hair. Perhaps it also explains those excessively made-up freaks who look like they're about to entertain me, but the show never begins.

Souls made by God converted into trash.

Could this be demonic?

WARNING

for evaluation purposes only

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Now here's a couple of gentlemen (I'm using the word in its loosest possible context) who look like they'd know about trains.

Please don't do that again. I just had a thought, so intense it was close to an auditory hallucination, of that man saying "choo-choo"

I need to have a shower. With my clothes on, just to be safe.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Why does it always have to be men doing things for women? It's nerds or toxic males or just regular rich men. Everywhere you look we're serving women. We invent vacuum cleaners, we give them irons, washing machines and toilet brushes. Their lack of respect makes me so mad.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

One of the things that's being lost here is that Jesus assigns your gender, and by all accounts He has done a pretty good job of it as witness that all things being equal there is close to a 50/50 ratio ensuring that most will find a partner.

The Incels have some legitimate complaint here considering that vast numbers have decided to thumb their noses at Jesus and change their "gender". It's no surprise that most "cis" types don't want to have anything to do with the "trans". Adding to the confusion is that these trannies now postulate that "gender" is now a "social construct" (not "binary" as Jesus intended) and that there are supposedly 31 (or more) "genders" to choose from.

All things considered, I'm surprised that there hasn't been more Incel terrorism. So far bread line Bernie Sanders hasn't tailored his socialism plans for the "genders", and as yet no one has thought to blame Trump for the current predicament - yet.

New Research Shows a Vast Majority of Cis People Won't Date Trans People
A recent study attempts to quantify the extent of trans discrimination when it comes to romantic and sexual relationships.
By Zhana Vrangalova
June 20, 2018

Considering the discrimination trans people face on a daily basis, it comes as no surprise that trans people are overlooked when it comes to dating. Two Canadian researchers recently asked almost 1000 cisgender folks if they would date a trans person in a new study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. This is the first study to ever attempt to quantify the extent of trans discrimination when it comes to romantic and sexual relationships.

958 participants (all but seven cisgender, ranging in age from 18 to 81, with an average age of 26) were asked to indicate which genders they would consider dating. The options included cisgender man, cisgender woman, trans man, trans woman, or genderqueer, and participants could select as many genders as they wanted.

Only 12% of all participants selected “trans woman” and/or “trans man.”

Those who would consider dating a trans person didn’t differ in race/ethnicity, but were somewhat older, more likely to hold a university degree, and, unsurprisingly, less likely to be religious than those who would not date a trans person. But some of the most striking differences were in regards to participants’ gender and sexual orientation.

Virtually all heterosexuals excluded trans folks from their dating pool: only 1.8% of straight women and 3.3% of straight men chose a trans person of either binary gender. But most non-heterosexuals weren’t down for dating a trans person either, with only 11.5% of gay men and 29% of lesbians being trans-inclusive in their dating preferences. Bisexual/queer/nonbinary participants (these were all combined into one group) were most open to having a trans partner, but even among them, almost half (48%) did not select either ‘trans man’ or ‘trans woman.’

. . . .

https://www.them.us/story/cis-trans-dating

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond

Please don't do that again. I just had a thought.….of that man saying "choo-choo"

Apologies. I'm not sure which man - the one on the right? There have been other trends more or less guaranteeing frustration in the expectations versus outcomes department. Rather than link to events where everyone sits on the floor rocking back-and-forth as though in a row boat on high seas, a less explicit comparison can show why they resort to terrorism in the end.

What they thought they were getting	What . .. . they . .. . actually . .. . got

By disregarding Scriptural standards one thing is certain.

Satan is able to deflect productive effort and establish wasted energies for his own purpose.

HELL FOREVER

Although immersed in Anglo-Hibernian protestantism, C. S. Lewis nevertheless had moments seemingly free from heresy. Here is an excerpt from The Screwtape Letters, correspondence between demons published for the benefit of Episcopalians who let's face it need all the help they can get. In this context however the parallel is straightforward when applied to the incel community..

His aim will be to let sleeping worms lie. As this condition becomes more fully established, you [a lesser demon] will be gradually freed from the tiresome business of providing Pleasures as temptations. As the uneasiness and his reluctance to face it cut him off more and more from all real happiness, and as habit renders the pleasures of vanity and excitement and flippancy at once less pleasant and harder to forgo (for that is what habit fortunately does to a pleasure) you will find that anything or nothing is sufficient to attract his wandering attention. You no longer need a good book, which he really likes, to keep him from his prayers or his work or his sleep; a column of advertisements in yesterday’s paper will do. You can make him waste his time not only in conversation he enjoys with people whom he likes, but in conversations with those he cares nothing about on subjects that bore him. You can make him do nothing at all for long periods. You can keep him up late at night, not roistering, but staring at a dead fire in a cold room. All the healthy and outgoing activities which we want him to avoid can be inhibited and nothing given in return, so that at last he may say, as one of my own patients said on his arrival down here, “I now see that I spent most of my life in doing neither what I ought nor what I liked”

http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/arts/lit/PDFs/ScrewtapeLetters_CSL.pdf

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

frustration in the expectations versus outcomes department.

This brings up a whole new subject, worthy of a thinkpiece, but I don't know what to think about it. Media is raising people's attractiveness standards to a point where normies look ugly.

I'm not the first person to comment on this. I might be the first person to say, "What is to be done?".

People have tried to deal with the supply side of this, pressuring barbie to have an anatomically-correct waist, rather than the standard "died while hoola-hooping with a boa constrictor" figure. Feminists and whined and shrieked and demanded that men do something for them about the "male gaze" "objectifying" blah blah blah. It's all achieved nothing.

I think we have to handle this from the other end. I think we should make our citizen's attractiveness a national priority. We need a Marshall Plan/Manhattan Project for hotness. Where to even start? Well, already in South Korea they treat plastic surgery the way we treat makeup:

Sure, they all look the same, but it's a better same now.

But there's a lot of ground to cover before we get to that point. First we need to do stuff like stop confusing pajamas with black-tie wear, agree that the word "juicy" is not appropriate on any body part, and, oh yeah, someone somehow please convince people that doing sit-ups does not cause ebola.

Folks, look at our birthrate. We are on an extinction trajectory. This is more important than 95% of the issues people fight in the streets over.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

Their lack of respect makes me so mad.

I'm afraid it is in our nature and this is why we need Christ more than anything else in our lives. Augustine makes a compelling case about the differences of the sexes that all women should understand in a personal way:

Originally Posted by Augustine

Woman does not possess the image of God in herself but only when taken together with the male who is her head, so that the whole substance is one image. But when she is assigned the role as helpmate, a function that pertains to her alone, then she is not the image of God. But as far as the man is concerned, he is by himself alone the image of God just as fully and completely as when he and the woman are joined together into one.

Tertullian explains in a scientific way why women are so ungrateful in general:

Originally Posted by Tertullian

In pain shall you bring forth children, woman, and you shall turn to your husband and he shall rule over you. And do you not know that you are Eve? God’s sentence hangs still over all your sex and His punishment weighs down upon you. You are the devil’s gateway; you are she who first violated the forbidden tree and broke the law of God. It was you who coaxed your way around him whom the devil had not the force to attack. With what ease you shattered that image of God: Man! Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die… Woman, you are the gate to hell.

I know this is no excuse and on behalf of all women, I apologize.

[MitzaLizalor]

The Bible explains that Adam's sin and the woman's sin were different.

Genesis chapter 3
9- The LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that
-- thou shouldest not eat?
12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done?
-- And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

That's from the historical record. It explains what happened and the responses to God's questions. The next passage records specific transgressions surrounding consumption of this fruit. Satan's crime and punishment are described first.

14 The LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above
-- every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life …
16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth
-- children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
17 And unto Adam he said Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife and hast eaten of the tree of which
-- I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it
-- all the days of thy life.

Without going into what certain types consider this tree to be or what its fruit consists of, it is worth mentioning an objection about the serpent. Satan and the serpent are the same. There is no validity to claims that it was an alien or an exotic species no longer with us. Similarly, claims that Eve did nothing wrong because she had not been created when God prohibited eating the fruit and/or that in any event she was deceived simply do not align with Scripture. Two passages from The New Testament are sufficient here.

Revelation chapter 20 & I Timothy chapter 2
1- I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2- And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent which is the Devil and Satan and bound him a thousand years.

13 Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

[Kyrre Eliasen]

Jesus would probably kiss their feet and it makes me sick.YES. I am a lesser men.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Kyrre Eliasen

Jesus would probably kiss their feet

On one hand, Jesus broke bread with prostitutes and bartenders, neither of whom are known for their virginity.

On the other hand, he gave loaves and fishes to the multitudes. Multitudes with time on their hands, a taste for starchy food, and I don't know this for a fact, but a lot of people are saying that fishes were the fleshlight of their time. Between that and His pandering to the meek, maybe incels were among his followers.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond

I think we should make our citizen's attractiveness a national priority. We need a Marshall Plan/Manhattan Project for hotness. ...First we need to do stuff like stop confusing pajamas with black-tie wear...

And don't give me the "I'm too poor" excuse, Africans are poorer than you and look how they dress:



Even their terrorist gangs dress with, uh, innovation, I guess:



I don't know what effect they have on the enemy, but they scare the snot out of me.

[MitzaLizalor]

Some lively fabrics right there [1st picture] suggesting a good starting point: ironing. There's something called "interlock" which is often used for T-shirts, usually cotton, something that doesn't need ironing, a fabric I always avoid. Here's an example:

. . .

Normally woven fabric, similar to a cotton or linen bedsheet, is much preferable but it's getting so difficult to find simple garments (such as T-shirt styles) made from this. The main reason is laziness. Interlock can be worn un-ironed but is less comfortable and often scruffy looking, indeed I suspect that certain types actually want to look like they've been dragged through a hedge backwards. Or other hedge activities I'm not going to describe.

. .. . .

Languor is at the heart of every attempt to overthrow established orders, whether the government in Africa or whatever the incel movement thinks should be destroyed to better suit their cohort. It comes from an unwillingness (or the inability) to construct an environment for themselves. Instead like termites they'll gnaw away at what already exists, built up by others over hundreds of years with each generation adding to or adapting what had been achieved before.

Proverbs 6:6 Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise.

Presumably incels are unable to conceive of a "next generation" and have probably never held an iron in their lives. Those Africans do seem more smartly dressed—none of them are wearing interlock—and I still have fabric available 100% cotton, vibrant hues, which could be made up into simple garments; maybe not T-shirts as such but similar with long sleeves. And yes, they would all need ironing. There's no excuse for a slovenly appearance, it's the first step to indolence. Some slogans were suggested in another thread which could be embroidered on and with each garment supplied to an incel we could offer a free iron and a KJV.