[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Originally Posted by liberalnightmare

RAPIST

I'm adding this to my archive of false rape allegations perpetrated by lesbians. It seems like anyone who walks God's path is accused of rape by Satan's minions.


It is a very scary time for boys, who are now denied the right to spank their wives if they don't perform sexually.

It's a good thing this Satanic accuser is not physically present, since they seem to be menstruating and looking at a menstruating woman is a crime against God.
Leviticus 18:19

[Faith_Machine]

Oh my goodness, I did not know that. What if the woman is hiding the fact that she's menstruating?

This is something of a catch-22, because it's the good, decent women who hide their menstruation however they can.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Faith_Machine

Oh my goodness, I did not know that. What if the woman is hiding the fact that she's menstruating?

This is something of a catch-22, because it's the good, decent women who hide their menstruation however they can.

Very true, brother. And the truth is, I don't know the answer to that, as I have never looked upon a menstruating woman. I imagine the carnage would traumatize any Christian.

[Dana723]

Originally Posted by Faith_Machine

Oh my goodness, I did not know that. What if the woman is hiding the fact that she's menstruating?

This is something of a catch-22, because it's the good, decent women who hide their menstruation however they can.

Good Christian women go to their Menstru-hut and stay there until it is over. That way, they don't run the risk of touching something or someone and making it or them unclean.

And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. Leviticus 15:19

[Jim Farmer]

Originally Posted by liberalnightmare

Lol nice try, I'm not in San Bruno, anyone who actually traces my IP address can see that.

Well, if you're not in Peter, and you're not in Bruno, who are you in?

[Mike Adams]

I may be able to shed a little light on what female transsexuals have in their pants. The ones that were men but now are no longer men. Of course I only know this because a friend informed me.

My friend described it as such.


The meat of the <<<male anatomical part>>> had been removed. The <<<another male anatomical part>>> had also been removed. The <<<yet another male anatomical part>>> is pulled up into two parts either side of the skinned out <<<the first male anatomical part>>>. This creates a wrinkly <<<female anatomical part>>>. The <<<the first male anatomical part>>> is then pushed inside out back into the body to create a hole.


Road test.


To use the aforementioned equipment you need to put your <<<the first male anatomical part>>> into the new hole of the inside-out <<<the first male anatomical part>>>. However it won't juice up like a regular <<<female anatomical part>>> so heavy lube is required. The <<<another female anatomical part>>> doesn't get relocated, as it is made from the tip of the foreskin. You'll find that 6 inches deep so you really have to get stuck in.


A word of caution.


If you don't use enough lube, when you pull out you will take the inside-out <<<the first male anatomical part>>> with you and it will right itself ... albeit missing the meat in the middle to resemble a small pink windsock. Should this happen you are to push it back in to save any embarrassment to your new lady friend.


Again, I'm sorry I can't go into too much more detail. My friend was extremely cagey about the whole experience.

[Faith_Machine]

Mike, I hope you understand nobody here engages in sex before marriage.