[its_faith]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

They certainly are, and now they are doing it again. An "ethics" part of the Federal Government is now saying the $700,000 George lent his campaign has no source or record of how it was spent.

Of course there is no record. Do those nit wits think George is going to give this ammunition to his political opponent? In politics one has to play it close to the vest. Where this money came from and what happened to it is George's business and no one else's.

Not to worry, the republican house had the foresight to defund the ethics committee.

[James Hutchins]

I remember a story about another man that walked the Earth and was persecuted. He too, was doubted and His Prophecy doubted and the naysayers tried to kill Him off. His name was Jesus Christ.
Coincidence?

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by James Hutchins

I remember a story about another man that walked the Earth and was persecuted. He too, was doubted and His Prophecy doubted and the naysayers tried to kill Him off. His name was Jesus Christ.
Coincidence?

And now, Brother Hutchins, who is the ethics committee? It has but one member, Jesus Christ. And, He wants George Santos in the House. Fortunately, Republicans have tanked the phony one.

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

And now, Brother Hutchins, who is the ethics committee? It has but one member, Jesus Christ. And, He wants George Santos in the House. Fortunately, Republicans have tanked the phony one.

Glory! Jews pretend to be white all the time and suffer zero negative consequences for it. Now ONE white (-ish; is he like part spic or something?) guy does the opposite and they absolutely lose their minds. "Expel him from Congress!" they say. "Kill him!" And that's just the Republican Jews who voted for him in the first place. It really shows a lot about our society and the nature of our Zionist-occupied government.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

And now, Brother Hutchins, who is the ethics committee? It has but one member, Jesus Christ. And, He wants George Santos in the House. Fortunately, Republicans have tanked the phony one.

If the shoe were on the other foot, would Democrats let millions of illegals and dead people vote all across the country and - worse - cover it up? The steal has been so effective precisely because of the lack of evidence. That's some Deep State infiltration right there - CIA, NSA, FBI level deception plus local cooperation, and millions of Mexicans who refuse to talk. Which is why we need to get rid of them, all of them.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

Perhaps it's not his sweater but his personal hygiene that keeps other House Republicans away...

So is it true that his second-grade nickname was "Stinky"?

[Johny Joe Hold]

Democrats have now started a rumor George performed drag at a drag competition. George knows this is not true. If only those making accusations about George were honest he would not be having all these distractions.

This drag queen thing is all the more ridiculous because it took place in Brazil, a Mexican country way down in South America. Further, only three people recognize the drag queen, who was not named "George", as Santos. The queen the three refer to lost out in a drag queen contest so it is all about nothing.

George Santos denies report that he was a drag queen — despite his ex-friend releasing photos | Salon.com


Santos denies performing as a drag queen | The Hill

[Johny Joe Hold]

Democrats get more disgusting by the minute. Now they are publishing six pictures of our friend George in drag. He was probably raising money for one of his many charitable causes and not actually performing drag entertainment. I'm telling you, we need to pray hard for George.

[WWJDnow]

I'm against all kinds of homosexual entertainment, but I've got to say, he doesn't look half bad for a Jewish woman.

What people don't realize is that Rep. Santos was in drag because he was an undercover CIA officer, not because he's some kind of pervert.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by WWJDnow

I'm against all kinds of homosexual entertainment, but I've got to say, he doesn't look half bad for a Jewish woman.
What people don't realize is that Rep. Santos was in drag because he was an undercover CIA officer, not because he's some kind of pervert.

From what one reads about George, he is a brave guy and may well have been doing some deep cover work for law enforcement.

Then, there is the possibility he was doing some very clever political work. He was Jewish for the Jew vote. Maybe he needed the women's vote and appeared accordingly. Or, perhaps he was after the trans vote.

Whatever his reason, he is a Republican on the way up.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

It's been a bumpy start for sure, but maybe the way forward is for Mr. Santos to champion some popular Republican ideas. I've been learning more about the process:

Any member in the House of Representatives may introduce a bill at any time while the House is in session by simply placing it in the “hopper” at the side of the Clerk's desk in the House Chamber. The sponsor's signature must appear on the bill.

He can jot down his ideas on a post-it note during sessions and pop them in the hopper - e.g. 999 flat tax plan, repeal Obamacare, impeach Biden, nuke a hurricane, purchase Greenland - and by association his reputation will rise in proportion to the quality of the ideas.

[Dennis Lukes]

Sometimes decent men will dress in women's clothing for legitimate reasons or as a joke. It's only sinful when liberal "men" do drag to be perverts.