[Seth Campbell]

First of all, what part of No homosexuals or women allowed! can you not understand?

Originally Posted by Twiggy

Which part? Men DO tend to be physically stronger than women, that's just obvious. If you meant the bit about it being the man's fault- I just wore short shorts down to the corner shop and back and no-one raped me (thankfully).

So you wear clothing specifically designed to create lust in a man, and then get upset if they lust after you? You're a liar! You want men to lust after you and I'm sure you secretly wish some man would rape you. You would get to have the rough sex that you so desperately crave and then play the victim afterwards.

Surely if those men had the slightest bit of self-control they could stop themselves from committing a horrible crime,

Us True Christian™ men do. But you liebral femnazi's are constantly telling your men that they're nothing but little boys who evolved from monkeys. Then somehow you get upset when they act the way you treat them.

the effects of which often stay with girls for years afterwards?

So you admit that the woman is damaged goods afterwards, yet you don't think that the "rapist" should have to take care of her for the rest of her life?

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Seth Campbell

First of all, what part of No homosexuals or women allowed! can you not understand?
I just ignored that, soz. Don't see why this topic should be men only anyway

So you wear clothing specifically designed to create lust in a man, and then get upset if they lust after you? You're a liar! You want men to lust after you and I'm sure you secretly wish some man would rape you. You would get to have the rough sex that you so desperately crave and then play the victim afterwards.
No, I wear shorts because they're comfortable and more appropriate in the summer so I don't over heat. I don't mind if men "lust" over me as long as they don't act on it. I don't crave rough sex either


Us True Christian™ men do. But you liebral femnazi's are constantly telling your men that they're nothing but little boys who evolved from monkeys. Then somehow you get upset when they act the way you treat them.
NO-one with a basic understanding of evolution would say that men (or women) evolved from monkeys. I also don't treat men like little boys

So you admit that the woman is damaged goods afterwards, yet you don't think that the "rapist" should have to take care of her for the rest of her life?
I think "damaged goods" is a very loaded term. They may will traumatised for a long time, but to suggest that they are "damaged goods" implies that they are inferior to other women, which is not the case.

x

[Born Again Bob]

Posts of logical/ religious nature moved to:

2+2=5 If The Bible Says So

[Saint Elmo]

Lord give me strength to deal with em.......

It wurn't about logic. It were about spreading Love and Knowledge.

[Chlosman]

Originally Posted by Larry Lee

Brother Jeb, that's a terrific tract to give to women of all ages.

If I recall correctly, it was social scientists at Patrick Henry College who demonstrated that fully 89% of all rapes are associated with a woman's inappropriate attire. Why do secularists deny the fact that women are responsible for most rapes?

Seriously? You think that just because a woman may be dressed with maybe something that expresses her as an individual gives another person the right to rape them? I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here but if I've got it right then I think you may have to look at it from a girl's point of view. Being a girl myself, I don't generally get dressed in the morning and think "I'm most likely to get raped if I wear this" and then put that outfit on. I wear what I think suits me. I think it's usually the time and the place that has an impact on rape. For example, a lot of rapes happen in a dark place like an alley... late at night, regardless of what the woman is wearing.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Chlosman

I think it's usually the time and the place that has an impact on rape. For example, a lot of rapes happen in a dark place like an alley... late at night, regardless of what the woman is wearing.

Why the wink? Is it to signify you're GIVING ADVICE ON HOW TO GET RAPED!?!?!?

[Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson]

Originally Posted by Chlosman

Seriously? You think that just because a woman may be dressed with maybe something that expresses her as an individual gives another person the right to rape them?

If expresses her as an individual is code for dressing like a whore, then they should not be surprised when they get treated like whores.

Originally Posted by Chlosman

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here but if I've got it right then I think you may have to look at it from a girl's point of view.

When you find us one to give her POV I would be interested in hearing it, sir.

Originally Posted by Chlosman

Being a girl myself,

A girl who "faps to Jesus".

Originally Posted by Chlosman

I don't generally get dressed in the morning and think "I'm most likely to get raped if I wear this" and then put that outfit on.

I certainly hope not. If you think an outfit is going to get you raped you should not put it on. I even have to be careful not to wear my tight Wranglers too much or women try to rape me.

Originally Posted by Chlosman

I wear what I think suits me. I think it's usually the time and the place that has an impact on rape. For example, a lot of rapes happen in a dark place like an alley... late at night, regardless of what the woman is wearing.

What is a woman doing in a dark alley alone dressed like a whore? She should be dressed modestly and have a church elder or a male family member there to protect her at all times.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson

What is a woman doing in a dark alley alone dressed like a whore? She should be dressed modestly and have a church elder or a male family member there to protect her at all times.

Isn't that inconvenient? What if she needs the loo or something?

[Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

Isn't that inconvenient? What if she needs the loo or something?

In that case, she can wait until she gets home, smart mouth.

[Chlosman]

Originally Posted by Jeb Thurmond

Why the wink? Is it to signify you're GIVING ADVICE ON HOW TO GET RAPED!?!?!?

Quite obviously not, I didn't realise it was a wink, it looks more confused than suggestive.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson

In that case, she can wait until she gets home, smart mouth.

What if she can't wait though?

Originally Posted by Chlosman

Quite obviously not, I didn't realise it was a wink, it looks more confused than suggestive.

I think your problem is that you're trying to use logic and morals to argue your point, neither of which are effective debating tools in this forum

[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

What if she can't wait though?

Then she will burn in Hell of course.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Then she will burn in Hell of course.

For going to the toilet?
Scripture?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

For going to the toilet?
Scripture?

The following scripture explains that for a woman to receive a commandment from her husband is no different than if her husband received a commandment from God.

Ephesians 5:22-24 (King James Version) 22Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. 24Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

[HTannor]

Ah, Twiggy, you are so over-matched here you should take yourself elsewhere.

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Billy Bob Jenkins

The following scripture explains that for a woman to receive a commandment from her husband is no different than if her husband received a commandment from God.

It doesn't say that the husband shouldn't let his wife go to the toilet, and besides, didn't you say a male relative could accompany the woman anyway? So that wouldn't be applicable to them anyway.

Originally Posted by HTannor

Ah, Twiggy, you are so over-matched here you should take yourself elsewhere.

In what sense?
P.S. Why is my avatar thing so huge? Maybe it's just my computer but I seem to be taking up most of the page with my posts

[Jedediah]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

P.S. Why is my avatar thing so huge? Maybe it's just my computer but I seem to be taking up most of the page with my posts

Probably because you need to lay of the twinkies and velveeta a little bit, Porkchop. How do you expect to attract an upstanding Christian husband looking like that?

[Twiggy]

Originally Posted by Jedediah

Probably because you need to lay of the twinkies and velveeta a little bit, Porkchop. How do you expect to attract an upstanding Christian husband looking like that?

Ha ha, you're funny. What are Twinkies and velveete? I'm a Brit, I don't think we have those things. It's amusing that for years I thought I was too skinny,. and now you lot are telling me that I'm obese. Still, c'est la vie and all that

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

Still, c'est la vie and all that

Such a pigglet she can't even write a post without bringing veal into it. Yes, that's how it's spelt in proper American: v-e-a-l.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Twiggy

Ha ha, you're funny. What are Twinkies and velveete? I'm a Brit, I don't think we have those things. It's amusing that for years I thought I was too skinny,. and now you lot are telling me that I'm obese. Still, c'est la vie and all that

Waddle over to the elevator and we'll continue testing.