The introduction forum Attention Unsaved Trash: This the ONLY subforum you can start threads in. Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus. |
|
Innkeeper for Christ
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,730
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Not hacked by Mossad
|
|
Re: Christian dad new here -
06-01-2019, 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabella White
Why, thank you kindly for that highly relevant and useful information, dear Brother Lukes. I wish I could answer your question about what percentage of the that the Pope says it's okay to ignore. My belief is that the answer, "just about all of it" would be 100% correct. Francis most likely has most of the truth within the filed away under "Useless & Meaningless Information", probably hidden somewhere in the Vatican archives, next to the pornography collection.
|
Well, Genesis 1 gets ignored because the Pope believes, like an idiot, that the world is billions of years old and that animals "evolved" into their present forms. They start ignoring God's word right out of the gate. I'm sure it's not 100% exactly. There are verses here and there (like Song of Solomon 3:9 and Haggai 1:1) that don't interfere with the Papacy's mission to build a sodomistic, feminized, Mary-worshipping, blood drinking, idolatrous cult bearing little resemblance to Christianity, so I'm sure they don't cut those ones out. They also love to cherry pick certain verses, like John 3:16. The context changes the meaning, so they have to excise John 3:15 and John 3:18. Any of the teachings of our omnipotent Creator that contradicts the wine-fueled rantings of an elderly gay man in a dress gets thrown out. Anything leftover can stay so the Catlicks can hold up their mutliated Latin false Bibles and say, "We're Christians too, we're God's true church!" Lies of Satan!
|
|
True Christian™ Lady Extraordinaire, an Honorary Male Biblicist
|
|
Posts: 8,762
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Surrounded by heathens
|
|
Re: Christian dad new here -
06-01-2019, 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes
There are verses here and there (like Song of Solomon 3:9 and Haggai 1:1) that don't interfere with the Papacy's mission to build a sodomistic, feminized, Mary-worshipping, blood drinking, idolatrous cult bearing little resemblance to Christianity, so I'm sure they don't cut those ones out.
|
Brother Lukes, I was going to say that they also like anything to do with wine, what with mostly coming from inebriated countries like Ireland, Italy, Spain, France, all the Mexican lands and Liverpool. But I see that this is implicit later in your post:
Quote:
... the wine-fueled rantings of an elderly gay man in a dress ...
|
Sister Isabella, I have always taken the transubstantiation lie to be just another excuse to get drunk to the point of vomiting on their own shoes.
Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!
|
|
True Christian™ Icon of Feminine Virtue
|
|
Posts: 4,854
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Ungodly Buffalo, NY, MAGA USA
|
|
Re: Christian dad new here -
06-01-2019, 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey
Sister Isabella, I have always taken the transubstantiation lie to be just another excuse to get drunk to the point of vomiting on their own shoes.
|
Oh, Sister Joanna, I think you are absolutely correct there -- no doubt about it. I don't even want to think of what else goes on when those Cathyolick priests get drinking behind the scenes. Do they really expect us to believe that they put the cork in the bottle once communion is finished? This photo proves otherwise!
A blessed day to you, dear Sister Joanna,
Sincerely, Isabella W.
(Mrs.) Isabella White
Hebrews 10:19 "Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the of "
|
|
Completely CRAZY for the Lord
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 14,663
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leviticus Landing
|
|
From Canon Law -
06-02-2019, 02:30 AM
FREQUENCY
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P38.HTM
Can. 901A priest is free to apply the Mass for anyone, living or dead. Can. 902Unless the welfare of the Christian faithful requires or suggests otherwise, priests can concelebrate the Eucharist. They are completely free to celebrate the Eucharist individually, however, but not while a concelebration is taking place in the same church or oratory. Can. 903A priest is to be permitted to celebrate even if the rector of the church does not know him, provided that either he presents a letter of introduction from his ordinary or superior, issued at least within the year, or it can be judged prudently that he is not impeded from celebrating. Can. 904Remembering always that in the mystery of the eucharistic sacrifice the work of redemption is exercised continually, priests are to celebrate frequently; indeed, daily celebration is recommended earnestly since, even if the faithful cannot be present, it is the act of Christ and the Church in which priests fulfill their principal function. Can. 905§1. A priest is not permitted to celebrate the Eucharist more than once a day except in cases where the law permits him to celebrate or concelebrate more than once on the same day.
§2. If there is a shortage of priests, the local ordinary can allow priests to celebrate twice a day for a just cause, or if pastoral necessity requires it, even three times on Sundays and holy days of obligation. Can. 906Except for a just and reasonable cause, a priest is not to celebrate the eucharistic sacrifice without the participation of at least some member of the faithful.
MORE HERE
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P36.HTM
FROM THE TOP
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM
|
|
An old soul
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 5,207
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA-UK-France (traveling)
|
|
Re: Christian dad new here -
06-02-2019, 06:28 PM
906 rules for behaviour? It's almost as if these freaks don't have any inner moral compass and need it all spelt out for them. Fortunately we Christians have the Bible to tell us how to behave, so we don't need some long list of archaic rules. Some of the better Presidents even have Jesus whisper directly in their ear. Aye aye capn, hard turn right.
|
|
True Christian™ Lady Extraordinaire, an Honorary Male Biblicist
|
|
Posts: 8,762
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Surrounded by heathens
|
|
Re: From Canon Law -
06-02-2019, 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor
Can. 901 A priest is free to apply the Mass for anyone, living or dead.
|
Anyone? I find that worrying. Are they suggesting that they are free to apply the Mass for decent people like you, me, our children and deceased ancestors ... and also for the president of France and Pol Pot? This is very reminiscent of the Mor(m)ons, with their random baptism of anyone whose name they get hold of when they go through your trash.
Stuff like this seems to be a feature of false religions which base their mumbo-jumbo on statues, golden plates and made-up scriptures. These so-called churches should be banned.
Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!
|
|
Completely CRAZY for the Lord
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 14,663
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leviticus Landing
|
|
Re: From Canon Law -
06-03-2019, 08:05 AM
I had assumed that dead people, I suppose they'd be thought of as present for the occasion, constituted the priest not celebrating eucharist by himself. And after Attila-the-Hun they could do Charles Dickens (per Can. 906) and so on.
|
|
True Christian™ Lady Extraordinaire, an Honorary Male Biblicist
|
|
Posts: 8,762
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Surrounded by heathens
|
|
Re: From Canon Law -
06-03-2019, 08:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor
I had assumed that dead people, I suppose they'd be thought of as present for the occasion, constituted the priest not celebrating eucharist by himself. And after Attila-the-Hun they could do Charles Dickens (per Can. 906) and so on.
|
I suppose it depends on what "apply a mass" means. Not being a Catlick, I neither know nor care, though it sounds like applying a poultice of figs in the style of 2 Kings 20:1-7. (Incidentally, Hezekiah was a bit of a drama queen about a mere boil, wasn't he?)
But I digress. I have heard Irish people wittering on about "saying a mass for" someone - usually but not always dead. Sometimes comatose from the drink perhaps, or maybe away with the fairies as they say in their quaint idiom. So, they would be technically living, but not as we know it.
Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!
|
|
Completely CRAZY for the Lord
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 14,663
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leviticus Landing
|
|
Re: Christian dad new here -
06-03-2019, 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole
906 rules for behaviour?
|
More.
Here for example are Cann. One Thousand seven hundred and forty seven (to) One Thousand seven hundred and fifty two. Interminably self-referential, I've included can. 1747 and preserved links in the text where—by following them—you'll enter a labyrinth hosting neither Pasiphaë nor her Minotaur but a fish aficionado in full regalia tormenting the God we love. Can. 1747§1. The removed pastor must refrain from exercising the function of pastor, vacate the rectory as soon as possible, and hand over everything belonging to the parish to the person to whom the bishop has entrusted the parish.
§2. If, however, the man is sick and cannot be transferred elsewhere from the rectory without inconvenience, the bishop is to leave him the use, even exclusive use, of the rectory while this necessity lasts.
§3. While recourse against a decree of removal is pending, the bishop cannot appoint a new pastor, but is to provide a parochial administrator in the meantime. Can. 1748If the good of souls or the necessity or advantage of the Church demands that a pastor be transferred from a parish which he is governing usefully to another parish or another office, the bishop is to propose the transfer to him in writing and persuade him to consent to it out of love of God and souls. Can. 1749If the pastor does not intend to submit to the counsel and persuasions of the bishop, he is to explain the reasons in writing. Can. 1750Notwithstanding the reasons alleged, if the bishop decides not to withdraw from his proposal, he is to consider the reasons which favor or oppose the transfer with two pastors selected according to the norm of can. 1742, §1. If he then decides to implement the transfer, however, he is to repeat the paternal exhortations to the pastor. Can. 1751§1. When this has been done, if the pastor still refuses and the bishop thinks that the transfer must be made, he is to issue a decree of transfer, establishing that the parish will be vacant after the lapse of a set time.
§2. If this period of time has passed without action, he is to declare the parish vacant. Can. 1752In cases of transfer the prescripts of can. 1747 are to be applied, canonical equity is to be observed, and the salvation of souls, which must always be the supreme law in the Church, is to be kept before one’s eyes.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|