[Gabriel Reproba]

In a long awaited return to Biblical law, a judge has ruled that a woman who accused a man of raping her is actually the one to blame because she was dressed like a complete whore and was asking for it. Now, while those of us who understand the Bible and its teachings on the matter of rape and modesty, this is not a shock. What IS a shock is that it was a Canadian judge who ruled this way. While I would normally discount anything a hockey-playing, round-bacon-eating, flappy-headed Canadian says, there ARE a few True Christians™ everywhere in the world, cut off from the good people in the USA, spreading God’s word. It looks like we have found one to lead the way from the Canadian bench. We can only hope that all US judges will follow this noble lead.

I will admit that the issue of rape and guilt is a BIT complex for non-Biblical scholars, so I think it best to do a primer on rape before I delve into the judge’s ruling. We know from the Bible that:

1) Rape is often a crime committed by females against men for which the women should be punished
2) Sometimes rape of innocent women can be used by God to punish men
3) Rape is often a tool of God's mercy and love
4) Because of all of this, God has strict rules about how men, and especially women, should behave.

I shall prove these points first, and then discuss the Godly judge who is striving to bring the Lord's Will to the justice systems of the world.

RAPE IS OFTEN A CRIME COMMITTED BY FEMALES AGAINST MEN

As we all know, the Bible shows us that rape is often a crime committed by harlots who go about town dressed like whores. If you doubt this, note that the Law clearly states that in such situations, such women are to be put to death:

Deuteronomy 22:23-24 (King James Version)
23If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; 24Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.

Clearly, this is a crime committed by this woman against her husband. As such, she is to be put to death in God’s sight. Notice, however, that in this case, it is not just the slut who dressed provocatively who is stoned to death. The man is also executed. Why? The feminazi atheists would have us believe it is simply because he raped her. Not so! It is for the same reason that the woman was killed: they BOTH caused the husband’s property to become completely ruined. It is because the rapist has ruined another man’s property that he is to be stoned to death. If you doubt this, consider the alternative:

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (King James Version)
28If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

You see the difference? The man who raped a harlot who was already married to another man gets executed. The man who rapes a unwed virgin only has to pay a fine and then marry his newly found blushing bride! God is surely a just and wise Lord!

SOMETIMES RAPE OF INNOCENT WOMEN CAN BE USED BY GOD TO PUNISH MEN

Sticking with the theme discussed above, God also shows us that the act of rape is a punishment for MEN and not always a punishment for women. For example, God punishes a husband of several women by having them raped in front of everyone:

2 Samuel 12:11-14 (King James Version)
11Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun. 12For thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun. 13And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD. And Nathan said unto David, The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die. 14Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.

The lessons of 2 Samuel are obvious:
1) God’s taking of these women, who have done nothing wrong, and having another man rape them is surely a punishment for husband and has nothing to do with the multiple innocent women God causes to be raped in broad daylight. The totally innocent women who were brought to the rapist by God against their will are tools of God's will and should be grateful that they were chosen by God as vessels of his actions and love for mankind.
2) Rape is not that big a deal. Note how the rape of the women is not punishment enough for this man? God kills the newborn, too. If rape were a big deal, God would not have been forced to kill the baby to punish the father.

GOD OFTEN USES RAPE AS AN ACT OF MERCY AND AS A TOOL OF HIS WILL

God often commands that his people rape the women of conquered lands. (Judges 21:10-24, Numbers 31:7-18, Deuteronomy 20:10-14, Deuteronomy 21:10-14, Judges 5:30, Zechariah 14:1-2, to name a few.)
Obviously, when God leads his people to destroy their enemies, killing EVERYONE would leave no-one behind. With no-one behind, there would be no evil-doers left to tell the cautionary tale of how the ways of their sinful cities brought God's wrath upon them. So, God, in his wisdom and love, leaves some women, usually only the virgins, alive to be repeatedly raped, usually just after they have seen all of their friends and family slaughtered in front of their own eyes. Isn't that beautiful? Rape serves as a punishment but also as an act of mercy! God always has a plan!

BECAUSE OF THIS, GOD HAS RULES ABOUT HOW MEN, AND ESPECIALLY WOMEN, SHOULD BEHAVE


With all of these different uses of rape, how can we tell when the rape is a crime to be punished (by killing the trollop or by forcing the man to marry her) or an act of God’s will to be revered as a great lesson or some other act? Fortunately, God has given us a useful tool in figuring this out: our clothing! He focuses on our apparel as the main way to ensure that any raping that goes on is not a crime of men but God’s will.

The Bible shows that women are aroused by physical stimulation and that, therefore, touching of women by men should be avoided:

1 Corinthians 7
1Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.

The Bible also makes it clear that men are aroused by visual stimulation.

Matthew 5:28 (King James Version)
28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

Therefore, God has given certain commands to men and women regarding this so they will not stimulate each other.
1) Men are not to touch women so as to not provide physical stimulation. (1 Cor 7:1, above)
2) Women are to dress modestly to as not to provide visual stimulation:

1 Timothy 2:9 (King James Version)
9In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

So while a woman is commanded to dress a certain way so the man is not stimulated, the man is commanded to act a certain way, to behave a certain way, so the woman is not stimulated. God then makes it clear that we shall not mix these up:

Deuteronomy 22:5 (King James Version)
5The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

All of the Scripture, when viewed together and in context shows that God is protecting us from our own sinful instincts and giving us tools to figure out that type of rape we are dealing with. Since God has made it clear how we are to dress, if we violate the Divine Dress Code, we are to blame for what happens. That is to say that while God DOES use rape as a tool for his will, and it is SOMETIMES a crime perpetrated by a man, it can often be a crime of wrongful dressing perpetrated by the woman.

Therefore, when a rape occurs, the ONLY question for our judges is “What was the woman wearing?”

If she was not following God’s law, it is clear that she is to blame because she violated 1 Timothy 2:9.

This leads us, at long last, to this wonderful news piece. A judge has ruled that a woman who claimed she was raped is to blame because of the way she was dressed:

Interesting observations here:

Why is it always the case that the women in the press complaining about this type of ruling are always complete uggos who don’t have to worry about being raped at all? I suspect it is because they like to THINK they are hotties and that this is something that they have to worry about. As if!

As I mentioned, the judge who ruled that the harlot had it coming because she dressed like a tramp is Canadian. I am thinking we need to fund this man in an effort to get him to give continuing education lessons to all U.S. judges so that they may better understand the Biblical law which we all realize our laws are based upon. When the jews and atheists wonder why we always try to put the Ten Commandments into the courtrooms, it shows that they haven’t read laws like the ones reviewed above. If they HAD, then they would fully understand what people like Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin mean when they keep repeating that the USA is a Christian Nation and we need to get back to a time when Biblical law held sway. Perhaps the example set by this Canadian judge will open some eyes round this country as to what it really means to be a True Christian™!