[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Many atheists laugh at the idea of a talking snake in Eden. They, being mean spirited, also point out that the snake had legs because God took them away:

Ge:3:14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

But now Scientists have proven God’s Word to be correct, there was a talking snake and it did have legs!!! And there are no atheists that dare argue with their scientist gods; atheists should now repent and accept Jesus:

A 95-million 6000-year-old fossil is helping scientists understand how snakes lost their legs through evolutionary time.[Edit: “evolutionary time” is like God’s time; a day can seem like 1000 years]

Found in Lebanon, the specimen is one of only three examples of an ancient snake with preserved leg bones.

One rear leg is clearly visible but researchers had to use a novel X-ray technique to examine another leg hidden inside the fossil rock.

The scientists' high-resolution 3D images suggest the legs in this particular species, Eupodophis descouensi, grew more slowly, or for a shorter period of time.

It is a conclusion made possible only after seeing all the bones obscured inside the limestone, and determining that although the creature possessed ankle bones, it actually had neither foot nor toe bones.

This remarkable discovery is obviously the actual snake to which/whom God spoke and it died of shame before its legs actually vanished.

If we have a snake with legs, why would it need them? Well, this is where a little bit of thought comes in:

Eupodophis descouensi was just under a metre long. It would have slithered along the ground during the Late Cretaceous, [Edit: Before The Flood] when dinosaurs still roamed the Earth. [Edit: proof that man and dinosaurs were together on Earth.]

It is unlikely the animal would have used the legs for moving, although it is possible they could have served some other function.

The Eupodophis descouensi [Edit: = Serpent of Eden] fossil was unearthed near the Lebanese village of al-Nammoura and was first described in 2000.

The snake spoke to Eve, right? So would it have been able to speak to her if it were on all fours? Well, possibly but not clearly.

Now let's consider what the scientist said, "It is unlikely the animal would have used the legs for moving" so I reckon that it propped itself up on those rear legs and addressed her almost face to face, probably hypnotizing her.

[Bobby-Joe]

Excellent news Brother Bathfire!

I would love to see the Darwnist Apologetics crown explain this one. I suppose they will try and claim those snake legs aren't really legs or there is no voice box and that snake did not have a tallywacker he used to debauch women with! Well bring it on Monkey Worshipers.

Secularists are so abursd with thier beliefs. Just projections of their own inner demons.

[godisfantastic]

I agree Brother Ezekiel!!! My only concern with this evidence is how can it be proven that this is THE speaking serpent, and not just another serpent?

[Brother Enoch]

Originally Posted by godisfantastic

I agree Brother Ezekiel!!! My only concern with this evidence is how can it be proven that this is THE speaking serpent, and not just another serpent?

I suppose it could have been the speaking serpent's mate, why does it matter? If you found Adam's preserved body, would you say it doesn't prove anything because you didn't find Eve? Sheesh.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Brother Enoch

I suppose it could have been the speaking serpent's mate, why does it matter? If you found Adam's preserved body, would you say it doesn't prove anything because you didn't find Eve? Sheesh.

Yes, it speaks, it has an enormous tallywacker. What other proof is need that it is the snake from the garden? Frankly I think the vile fossil should be destroyed before it is used in some gay orgy.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by godisfantastic

I agree Brother Ezekiel!!! My only concern with this evidence is how can it be proven that this is THE speaking serpent, and not just another serpent?

I think you are missing the glaringly obvious!

God created a serpent -
There was no need for more than one in Eden,
The serpent He created had legs
The fossil is of a legged serpent
The fossil was found near Eden
QED.

Any other serpents with legs will be found to be forgeries created by charlatans.

[godisfantastic]

Originally Posted by Brother Enoch

I suppose it could have been the speaking serpent's mate, why does it matter? If you found Adam's preserved body, would you say it doesn't prove anything because you didn't find Eve? Sheesh.

Well you wouldnt know it was Adam's body unless it was next to Eve's, otherwise how could you tell? This is why I ask how you know this is THE serpent found in the bible and not another common serpent?

[Brother Enoch]

Originally Posted by godisfantastic

Well you wouldnt know it was Adam's body unless it was next to Eve's, otherwise how could you tell? This is why I ask how you know this is THE serpent found in the bible and not another common serpent?

You apparently suffer from profound retardedism. If Adam's preserved body was found it woud be obvious. He would not have a navel. No other male human who ever existed can say the same. Seriously, how many times were you dropped on your head as a child?

[godisfantastic]

Originally Posted by Brother Enoch

You apparently suffer from profound retardedism. If Adam's preserved body was found it woud be obvious. He would not have a navel. No other male human who ever existed can say the same. Seriously, how many times were you dropped on your head as a child?

I guess not as many times as you were, flesh (including the navel) decomposes and only bones remain when someone dies.

[Cursed]

Originally Posted by godisfantastic

I guess not as many times as you were, flesh (including the navel) decomposes and only bones remain when someone dies.

Ha ha you're so dumb you don't even know you're dumb!

Bones decompose too, dummy. Have an able-minded person show you how to look this up and help you understand big words like "fossilization."

[Brother Enoch]

Originally Posted by godisfantastic

I guess not as many times as you were, flesh (including the navel) decomposes and only bones remain when someone dies.

How can something that isn't there, decompose?

You rode the short bus to school, didn't you?